Every Exam PrepFREE EXAM PREP
Ask AI

PMP Practice Test

192 free PMP practice questions with answers and explanations.

No signup required.

The PMP exam is administered by the Project Management Institute (PMI), with 180 scored questions and a time limit of 4 hours.

About these practice questions
Verified against the official content outline

These are original study questions written from published exam objectives—not recalled, copied, or confidential live-exam items. Always confirm current coverage with the official sources linked on this page.

Difficulty
QUESTION 1 / 100PeopleEasy0/0
A project manager notices two team members have had escalating disagreements over task ownership for three sprints. The PM meets with both privately, then facilitates a joint session to redefine responsibilities. Which conflict resolution technique is this primarily?
0/0session
Browse all questions & answers

Loading the remaining 92 questions…

People

52 questions
  1. 1. A project manager notices two team members have had escalating disagreements over task ownership for three sprints. The PM meets with both privately, then facilitates a joint session to redefine responsibilities. Which conflict resolution technique is this primarily?

    • A. Withdraw/avoid, by delaying the discussion until tempers cool
    • B. Collaborate/problem-solve, by incorporating multiple viewpoints into a mutually agreed solution
    • C. Force/direct, by imposing one person's viewpoint at the expense of the other
    • D. Smooth/accommodate, by emphasizing areas of agreement over disagreement
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    Collaborate/problem-solve involves incorporating multiple viewpoints and insights from differing perspectives to reach consensus, which matches the joint session redefining responsibilities. Withdraw/avoid means retreating from the conflict without resolving it. Force/direct pushes one viewpoint at the expense of others, which did not happen here. Smooth/accommodate just emphasizes agreement and downplays differences rather than jointly solving the root cause.

  2. 2. A project team is co-located but morale has dropped after a difficult client escalation. The project manager wants to rebuild trust and cohesion before the next milestone review. Which servant leadership behavior best supports this goal?

    • A. Assigning additional tasks to keep the team too busy to dwell on the incident
    • B. Removing organizational impediments and actively listening to team concerns
    • C. Escalating the morale issue directly to the sponsor for a decision
    • D. Waiting until the retrospective at project close to address it
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    Servant leadership prioritizes removing impediments and listening empathetically to build trust, which directly addresses morale after a setback. Overloading the team avoids the real issue. Escalating to the sponsor bypasses the PM's own responsibility to support the team. Waiting until project close ignores the immediate need and risks continued disengagement before the milestone.

  3. 3. A functional manager repeatedly reassigns a key resource off the project without notice, jeopardizing the schedule. What is the most effective first action for the project manager to take?

    • A. Immediately replace the resource with an external contractor without discussion
    • B. Escalate to the project sponsor and request formal disciplinary action against the manager
    • C. Have a direct conversation with the functional manager to understand priorities and negotiate resource commitments
    • D. Update the risk register and take no further action until the next status meeting
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: C
    In a matrix environment, the PM should first engage directly with the functional manager to understand competing priorities and negotiate a resolution, since this preserves the relationship and often resolves the issue quickly. Jumping to a contractor or disciplinary escalation is premature and damages working relationships. Merely logging a risk without engaging the stakeholder fails to address the immediate threat to the schedule.

  4. 4. A distributed team spans four time zones and communicates primarily via chat and email. The project manager notices important decisions are being made informally and not reaching all team members. What should the project manager do first?

    • A. Mandate that all team members work overlapping hours regardless of time zone
    • B. Establish a documented communication plan that defines how and where decisions are recorded and shared
    • C. Rely on the most active chat channel as the single source of truth without formal documentation
    • D. Reduce the team size to eliminate coordination overhead
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    A documented communication plan ensures decisions are captured and distributed consistently regardless of time zone, directly solving the information gap. Forcing overlapping hours across four time zones is impractical and harms work-life balance. Relying on an informal chat channel without structure perpetuates the same problem. Reducing team size does not address the root communication breakdown.

  5. 5. During a sprint, a developer identifies that a teammate is quietly struggling to keep pace due to a personal issue affecting focus. The project manager wants to address this with emotional intelligence. What is the best approach?

    • A. Document the performance issue immediately in a formal write-up for HR
    • B. Ignore the issue since personal matters are outside the project manager's scope
    • C. Privately check in with empathy, acknowledge the situation, and collaboratively adjust workload if needed
    • D. Publicly discuss the performance gap during the daily stand-up to ensure transparency
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: C
    Emotional intelligence calls for private, empathetic engagement that acknowledges the team member's situation while still protecting project outcomes through collaborative workload adjustment. Public discussion embarrasses the individual and damages trust. Jumping to formal HR documentation is disproportionate and skips supportive engagement. Ignoring the issue neglects the PM's responsibility to support team well-being and project performance.

  6. 6. A new team member joins an established agile team mid-project and is unfamiliar with the team's working agreements. What should the project manager prioritize to support this individual's integration?

    • A. Assign the most complex backlog item first to quickly assess their skill level
    • B. Onboard them with team norms, working agreements, and pairing with an experienced member
    • C. Have them shadow silently for the remainder of the project without active participation
    • D. Skip onboarding since agile teams are expected to self-organize immediately
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    Effective team building requires deliberately onboarding new members to existing norms and pairing them with experienced peers to accelerate integration and psychological safety. Assigning the hardest item first risks early failure and disengagement. Passive shadowing indefinitely delays real contribution. Assuming self-organization happens without support ignores the PM's role in facilitating team formation.

  7. 7. A project sponsor asks the project manager to bypass the change control process for a stakeholder-requested scope addition because the stakeholder is influential. What should the project manager do?

    • A. Comply immediately since sponsors outrank change control boards
    • B. Explain the risks of bypassing governance and recommend routing the request through the established change control process
    • C. Quietly implement the change and update documentation retroactively
    • D. Refuse to discuss the request and refer the sponsor to legal counsel
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    The project manager should uphold professional responsibility and organizational governance by explaining the risks of skipping change control and directing the request through the proper process, which still respects the sponsor's authority while protecting project integrity. Complying without process erodes governance and traceability. Implementing quietly and backfilling documentation is dishonest. Refusing to engage or deflecting to legal is an overreaction to a normal governance conversation.

  8. 8. A project manager is coaching a newly promoted team lead who tends to micromanage. Which coaching approach best supports the team lead's growth toward effective delegation?

    • A. Take over the team lead's responsibilities to demonstrate the correct approach
    • B. Ask guiding questions that help the team lead reflect on the impact of micromanagement and identify their own solutions
    • C. Tell the team lead exactly what to do in every situation going forward
    • D. Avoid the topic to prevent damaging the team lead's confidence
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    Effective coaching uses guided questions and reflection to build self-awareness and ownership of behavior change, which is more sustainable than directive instruction. Taking over responsibilities removes the growth opportunity entirely. Prescribing exact actions in every case fosters dependency rather than the intended delegation skill. Avoiding the topic allows a harmful pattern to continue unaddressed.

  9. 9. Two departments on a cross-functional project disagree on which vendor's data format to adopt, each citing valid technical constraints. The project manager convenes both leads to jointly evaluate options against shared project objectives. This reflects which principle of stakeholder engagement?

    • A. Deferring the decision indefinitely until one department changes its position
    • B. Delegating the decision entirely to the more senior department to avoid conflict
    • C. Building consensus through collaborative decision-making aligned to shared objectives
    • D. Selecting the option preferred by the department with the larger budget contribution
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: C
    Convening both leads to evaluate options against shared objectives is a collaborative, consensus-building approach that respects both parties' constraints while keeping focus on project goals. Deferring to seniority or budget size ignores the actual technical merits and can breed resentment. Indefinite deferral stalls progress and does not resolve the underlying disagreement.

  10. 10. A project manager observes that a team member consistently delivers excellent technical work but avoids speaking up in retrospectives, potentially withholding valuable process improvement ideas. What is the most appropriate action?

    • A. Require the team member to present at every future retrospective regardless of comfort level
    • B. Create a safer, lower-pressure channel (such as anonymous input or one-on-one conversations) to surface their insights
    • C. Exclude the team member from retrospectives since they do not contribute verbally
    • D. Note the behavior as a performance deficiency in the next formal review
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    Creating alternative, lower-pressure channels respects individual communication styles while still capturing valuable input, which is a core aspect of inclusive team facilitation. Forcing public presentation may increase discomfort without improving input quality. Excluding the person loses their perspective entirely. Framing quiet behavior as a performance deficiency mischaracterizes a communication preference as underperformance.

  11. 11. A project manager is building a team charter at project kickoff. Which element is most essential to include to prevent later disputes about how the team will operate?

    • A. A detailed list of every stakeholder's salary and title
    • B. Ground rules for communication, decision-making, and conflict resolution agreed upon by the team
    • C. A fixed schedule of mandatory overtime for the duration of the project
    • D. A complete technical architecture diagram for the deliverable
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    A team charter's core value is establishing agreed-upon ground rules for communication, decision-making, and conflict resolution, which prevents future disputes about team operations. Salary and title details are HR matters unrelated to team operating norms. Mandatory overtime is not a standard or advisable charter element. A technical architecture diagram belongs in project scope or design documentation, not the team charter.

  12. 12. A project manager wants to assign clear accountability for each major deliverable so exactly one person is answerable for its completion, while others may still contribute or be consulted. Which tool is best suited for this?

    • A. A RACI matrix, distinguishing Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed roles
    • B. A burndown chart tracking remaining work over time
    • C. A stakeholder power/interest grid
    • D. A control chart with upper and lower control limits
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    A RACI matrix explicitly assigns one Accountable person per deliverable alongside Responsible, Consulted, and Informed roles, which precisely matches the described need. A burndown chart tracks progress against remaining work, not role accountability. A power/interest grid classifies stakeholders by influence and interest, not task accountability. A control chart monitors process variation in quality management and has no role-assignment function.

  13. 13. A project manager joins a team where members hesitate to raise problems. What action most directly addresses this?

    • A. Building psychological safety by responding to raised problems without blame and acting on what is surfaced, so raising issues is demonstrably worthwhile
    • B. Requiring team members to report problems in writing to the sponsor
    • C. Introducing penalties for problems discovered late
    • D. Reducing team meeting frequency to save time
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    People stop raising problems when doing so has been costly or futile, so the fix is in how raised issues are received rather than in a reporting mechanism. Penalizing late discovery reliably produces later discovery, because the incentive to conceal rises with the consequence of disclosure.

  14. 14. Two senior team members disagree publicly about a technical approach and the disagreement is stalling work. What is the project manager's most appropriate first response?

    • A. Facilitate a structured discussion surfacing each position's reasoning and the criteria for deciding, so the team converges on a decision they can commit to
    • B. Escalate immediately to the sponsor for a ruling
    • C. Separate the two members so they no longer interact
    • D. Decide the technical approach personally to end the delay
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Collaborating to resolve the underlying disagreement produces a durable decision, whereas forcing or avoiding leaves the disagreement to resurface. Deciding a technical question the project manager is not best placed to judge also undermines the expertise the team was assembled for, though escalation remains appropriate if facilitation genuinely fails.

  15. 15. A team is newly formed and members are polite but not yet productive together. Which stage of team development is this and what does the leader provide?

    • A. Forming, requiring clear direction, defined roles and explicit expectations while the team has not yet established its own norms
    • B. Performing, requiring delegation and minimal intervention
    • C. Norming, requiring the leader to step back entirely
    • D. Adjourning, requiring closure activities
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Direction is highest at forming and reduces as the team establishes norms and capability, reaching delegation at performing. Applying a delegating style to a forming team produces confusion, which is why leadership style is matched to the team's current stage rather than held constant.

  16. 16. A servant leadership approach is adopted. What does it emphasize?

    • A. Removing impediments, providing what the team needs and developing its members, so the team can deliver rather than the leader directing every action
    • B. The leader making all decisions to relieve the team of responsibility
    • C. Minimizing communication with the team to avoid interruption
    • D. Delegating accountability for outcomes entirely to team members
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    The emphasis is enabling rather than abdicating, since the leader retains accountability while shifting the locus of decision-making toward those closest to the work. Impediment removal is the most tangible component, and a leader who does not act on raised impediments quickly finds they stop being raised.

  17. 17. A stakeholder with high power and low interest is identified. What engagement approach fits?

    • A. Keep satisfied, providing enough information to maintain support without demanding attention they have not offered
    • B. Manage closely with frequent detailed updates
    • C. Monitor with minimal effort
    • D. Keep informed with regular detailed reporting
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    The power and interest grid pairs high power and high interest with close management, high power and low interest with keeping satisfied, low power and high interest with keeping informed, and low on both with monitoring. Positions change as a project progresses, so the analysis is repeated rather than performed once at initiation.

  18. 18. A team formed six weeks ago has moved past initial politeness, and members are now openly clashing over technical approaches and unclear role boundaries, with two arguments erupting in the last planning meeting. How should the project manager interpret and respond to this situation?

    • A. Treat the conflict as a performance problem and issue formal warnings to the members involved
    • B. Recognize the team is in the storming stage and facilitate open discussion to clarify roles and working norms
    • C. Disband the current sub-teams and reassign members so that conflicting personalities are separated
    • D. Escalate the disagreements to the sponsor so leadership can impose a technical direction
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    Open clashes over approach and roles shortly after formation are the classic storming stage of team development, a normal and necessary phase. The leader's job is to surface the conflict constructively, clarify roles, and reinforce ground rules so the team can move toward norming. Separating members or issuing warnings suppresses the conflict without resolving its cause, and escalating to the sponsor abdicates the project manager's team-leadership responsibility.

  19. 19. A project team is distributed across three continents and struggles to choose tools for day-to-day collaboration. Some members have limited bandwidth, others work asynchronously, and decisions often need rapid input. What should most influence the project manager's selection of communication technology?

    • A. The technology the project manager personally finds most efficient for status reporting
    • B. Whichever platform the organization already licenses, regardless of fit
    • C. The tool with the richest feature set, since more capability always improves collaboration
    • D. Urgency of information needs, technology availability and ease of use, and the team's working environment
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: D
    Communication technology should be chosen against factors such as urgency of the need for information, availability and reliability of the technology for every member, ease of use, and the sensitivity of the information. A distributed team with bandwidth limits and mixed synchronous needs makes fit-for-purpose selection critical. Choosing based on the manager's preference, existing licensing alone, or feature richness ignores whether every member can actually participate effectively.

  20. 20. During planning in a matrix organization, a project manager knows the project will need two specialists from the analytics department during a period when that department is historically overloaded. What is the most proactive way to secure these resources?

    • A. Negotiate resource commitments with the analytics functional manager now and document them in the resource management plan and resource calendars
    • B. Wait until the work is scheduled to begin and then submit an urgent staffing request
    • C. Add schedule padding so the project can absorb whatever delay the resource shortage causes
    • D. Plan to outsource the analytics work immediately without consulting the functional manager
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    In a matrix structure, resources are controlled by functional managers, so early negotiation and documented commitments are the project manager's strongest protection against later contention. Recording agreements in the resource management plan and resource calendars makes them visible and enforceable. Waiting until the need is urgent surrenders negotiating leverage, padding hides the problem instead of solving it, and jumping straight to outsourcing bypasses cheaper internal options and the functional manager relationship.

  21. 21. A consistently strong developer has been working long hours for a month; her code review comments have become terse, defect rates in her modules are rising, and she has skipped several team syncs. What should the project manager do first?

    • A. Publicly remind the whole team about quality standards at the next meeting
    • B. Reassign her critical tasks to other developers without discussion to reduce risk
    • C. Meet with her privately to understand her workload and well-being, then rebalance assignments toward a sustainable pace
    • D. Document the quality decline and place her on a formal performance improvement plan
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: C
    The pattern of extended hours followed by declining quality and withdrawal points to overload or burnout rather than a competence problem. A private, empathetic conversation to understand the cause, followed by workload rebalancing, addresses the root cause and models servant leadership. Public reminders shame rather than help, silently stripping tasks damages trust, and formal performance action is premature when the manager has not yet investigated why performance changed.

  22. 22. Minutes before a client demo, two analysts begin disputing which of them caused a data discrepancy. The project manager steps in, emphasizes how much of the dataset both agree is correct, and suggests the ownership question be examined after the demo. Which conflict resolution technique is the project manager using?

    • A. Smoothing, because areas of agreement are emphasized while the underlying issue is deferred
    • B. Forcing, because the manager imposed a decision on both parties
    • C. Compromising, because each analyst gave up part of their position
    • D. Collaborating, because both parties are working toward a joint solution
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Emphasizing points of agreement to reduce tension while postponing the contentious issue is smoothing (accommodating). It is a temporary, relationship-preserving move that suits moments like an imminent demo, though the underlying issue still needs resolution later. Collaborating would involve jointly digging into the root cause now, forcing would impose one party's view, and compromising would require both parties to trade concessions, none of which happened here.

  23. 23. During system commissioning, an engineer reports that a pressure valve configuration could create a safety hazard if energized. Two leads disagree about whether the concern is valid, and the energization is scheduled within the hour. What conflict approach is most appropriate for the project manager right now?

    • A. Withdraw from the disagreement and let the more senior lead decide
    • B. Ask the leads to split the difference by energizing at reduced pressure
    • C. Direct an immediate halt to energization until the safety concern is formally assessed, even though one lead objects
    • D. Schedule a collaborative workshop for next week so both leads can fully explore the disagreement
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: C
    When safety is at stake and time is critical, a directive (forcing) decision is justified: the manager must stop the hazardous activity first and resolve the technical disagreement afterward. Collaboration is normally preferred but takes time this situation does not allow. Splitting the difference on a safety parameter is dangerous guesswork, and withdrawing abdicates responsibility for a decision that could cause harm. The temporary damage to relationships is an acceptable trade-off against a potential safety incident.

  24. 24. Two designers disagree about the shade of an internal admin screen's background color and keep raising it in meetings, though the style guide leaves it discretionary and no stakeholder has expressed a preference. The release is in two days. How should the project manager handle this conflict?

    • A. Convene a formal facilitated session to fully resolve the color question before release
    • B. Force a decision personally and instruct the designers never to raise the topic again
    • C. Escalate the disagreement to the product sponsor for a ruling
    • D. Defer the discussion until after the release, since the issue is trivial and does not affect the deliverable's acceptance
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: D
    Withdrawal or avoidance is a legitimate technique when an issue is trivial, when the cost of engaging exceeds the benefit, or when a cooling-off period helps. A discretionary cosmetic detail on an internal screen two days before release fits that profile, so postponing protects the team's focus. A formal facilitated session and sponsor escalation give a minor issue disproportionate weight, and forbidding future discussion suppresses healthy dialogue rather than managing it.

  25. 25. Two team leads each want the single available senior tester assigned fully to their workstream. After discussion, the project manager arranges for the tester to spend mornings with one workstream and afternoons with the other, and both leads accept the arrangement with some reluctance. Which conflict resolution outcome does this illustrate?

    • A. Collaborating, since both leads participated in the discussion
    • B. Forcing, since the manager dictated the split schedule
    • C. Compromising, since each party gave up part of what they wanted to reach an acceptable middle ground
    • D. Smoothing, since the manager minimized the disagreement
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: C
    Splitting the tester's time gives each lead some of what they asked for while denying both their full request, the defining lose-lose/partial-win pattern of compromise. It is workable but usually leaves both parties somewhat unsatisfied. Collaboration would have searched for a solution fully satisfying both needs, such as adding test capacity or resequencing work. Smoothing would emphasize agreement without solving allocation, and forcing would impose one lead's original demand over the other's.

  26. 26. After a salary adjustment resolved widespread pay complaints, a project manager is surprised that team engagement scores remain flat and discretionary effort has not improved. Which motivation concept best explains this result?

    • A. Compensation is a hygiene factor whose correction removes dissatisfaction but does not itself create motivation, which comes from achievement, recognition, and growth
    • B. Engagement scores are lagging indicators and will rise automatically next quarter
    • C. Pay increases always reduce motivation by shifting focus to extrinsic rewards
    • D. Team members are inherently unmotivated and require closer supervision
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Two-factor motivation theory distinguishes hygiene factors, such as pay and working conditions, from motivators, such as achievement, recognition, meaningful work, and growth. Fixing a hygiene factor eliminates dissatisfaction but does not generate positive engagement, which is exactly the observed pattern. Concluding the team is inherently unmotivated misreads the theory, pay rises do not automatically destroy motivation, and assuming scores will rise on their own has no basis.

  27. 27. A project manager leads a team of experienced research engineers who complain that rigid task assignments and detailed daily oversight are draining their enthusiasm. Which adjustment is most likely to improve their motivation?

    • A. Introduce a bonus tied to hours logged each week
    • B. Add a second daily check-in to catch problems earlier
    • C. Give the engineers greater autonomy over how they accomplish outcomes, with opportunities to deepen expertise and a clear connection to project purpose
    • D. Rotate all engineers to new task areas weekly to keep work novel
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: C
    Knowledge workers are motivated primarily by intrinsic factors: autonomy over their approach, mastery of their craft, and a sense of purpose. Loosening prescriptive control while keeping outcomes clear directly addresses the stated complaint. Paying for hours logged rewards presence rather than contribution, more oversight intensifies the demotivator, and forced weekly rotation disrupts the deep expertise these specialists value rather than supporting it.

  28. 28. A newly appointed delivery manager insists on approving every task before work starts, saying that people will slack off the moment supervision is relaxed. Which management assumption does this behavior reflect, and what is its likely effect on an experienced team?

    • A. Theory Y; the team will feel trusted and take more initiative
    • B. Theory X; the close control will likely erode trust and initiative in a team that is already self-motivated
    • C. Servant leadership; the manager is shielding the team from external pressure
    • D. Situational leadership; the manager is matching style to the team's low maturity
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    Assuming people avoid work and must be controlled is the Theory X view of motivation. Applied to an experienced, self-motivated team, pervasive approval gates communicate distrust and typically depress initiative and ownership. Theory Y is the opposite assumption, that people are self-directed when engaged. Servant leadership centers on removing obstacles, not adding control, and situational leadership would call for delegating to a competent team rather than directing it.

  29. 29. A project manager oversees two team members: a new hire who is enthusiastic but has never performed the upcoming integration task, and a veteran who has done it many times and works independently. How should the project manager adapt leadership style between them?

    • A. Provide the new hire with specific direction and frequent check-ins while delegating the task to the veteran with minimal oversight
    • B. Supervise both closely so neither feels singled out
    • C. Delegate fully to both, since equal treatment builds fairness
    • D. Pair them and manage them as a single unit with identical expectations
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Effective leaders adapt their style to each individual's competence and commitment for the task at hand. A willing novice needs directive guidance and structured feedback, while a proven expert performs best with delegation and autonomy. Supervising both closely demotivates the veteran, delegating to both abandons the novice, and managing them identically as a pair ignores the very differences that determine what support each person needs, even though pairing could complement a properly differentiated approach.

  30. 30. A project manager wants to develop a promising coordinator by delegating responsibility for the vendor-onboarding workstream. Which delegation approach gives the coordinator the best chance to grow while protecting the project?

    • A. Define the outcome, boundaries, and check-in points, then let the coordinator decide how to achieve it while remaining available for support
    • B. Hand over the workstream completely and avoid all involvement so the coordinator learns from unassisted failure
    • C. Provide a detailed step-by-step script the coordinator must follow exactly
    • D. Delegate only trivial administrative pieces and retain all decisions personally
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Good delegation transfers ownership of an outcome, not a script: clear expectations and boundaries, agreed checkpoints, and available support let the delegate exercise judgment while risk stays managed. Total abandonment exposes the project to unmonitored failure and is unfair to the learner. A rigid step-by-step script is task assignment, not delegation, and develops no judgment. Retaining every meaningful decision defeats the developmental purpose entirely.

  31. 31. A project manager wants to recognize outstanding work by a delivery group whose members come from a culture that strongly values group harmony and views individual spotlighting as uncomfortable. What is the most appropriate recognition approach?

    • A. Name a single most valuable performer at the all-hands meeting to set a visible example
    • B. Recognize the group's collective achievement in a way that honors its shared effort, while offering any individual appreciation privately
    • C. Skip recognition entirely to avoid any risk of cultural offense
    • D. Apply the organization's standard individual-award template unchanged for consistency
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    Recognition is only motivating when it is culturally meaningful to the recipients. For a group that prizes collective harmony, public team-level recognition reinforces the behavior while private appreciation still honors standout individuals without discomfort. Publicly singling out one performer risks embarrassing the very person being honored, withholding recognition wastes a motivation opportunity, and applying a standard template ignores the cultural awareness that global team leadership requires.

  32. 32. Midway through planning, a project manager discovers that the upcoming migration requires containerization skills that no current team member possesses, and the work begins in ten weeks. What is the best course of action?

    • A. Say nothing and hope the team can learn on the job once the migration starts
    • B. Immediately replace two team members with external contractors who have the skill
    • C. Arrange targeted training now for selected team members, track the skill gap in the resource management approach, and reassess readiness before the work begins
    • D. Descope the migration so the existing skill set is sufficient
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: C
    A known skill gap with a ten-week runway is a manageable planning problem: proactive training closes the gap, retains team knowledge, and is usually cheaper than replacement, while a readiness checkpoint protects the schedule if training falls short. Hoping the team improvises during execution converts a known risk into a likely defect source. Replacing members discards domain knowledge and damages morale prematurely, and descoping sacrifices project objectives before lighter options are exhausted.

  33. 33. A senior architect meets monthly with a junior engineer to discuss long-term career direction, professional networks, and lessons from the architect's own experience, independent of any specific project task. Which development relationship does this describe?

    • A. Coaching, because the architect is helping the engineer improve a specific skill
    • B. Performance management, because the meetings are recurring and structured
    • C. Training, because knowledge is being transferred from expert to novice
    • D. Mentoring, because an experienced practitioner is providing broad, long-term career and professional guidance
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: D
    Mentoring is a longer-term relationship in which a more experienced person shares wisdom, perspective, and career guidance that extends beyond any single task or skill. Coaching, by contrast, is typically shorter-term and focused on improving specific capabilities or performance goals. Performance management involves formal evaluation against objectives, which is absent here, and training is structured instruction in defined content rather than an ongoing personal guidance relationship.

  34. 34. In a tense steering meeting, a stakeholder accuses the project manager of hiding schedule problems. The project manager feels a surge of anger at the unfair claim. Which response best demonstrates emotional intelligence in the moment?

    • A. End the meeting immediately to avoid saying something regrettable
    • B. Stay silent for the rest of the meeting and address the accusation later by email
    • C. Pause to manage the emotional reaction, acknowledge the stakeholder's concern, and offer to walk through the schedule data together
    • D. Correct the stakeholder sharply so the accusation does not stand unchallenged
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: C
    Self-awareness and self-regulation mean noticing the anger, choosing not to act from it, and steering the exchange back to evidence, while acknowledging the concern maintains the relationship. Responding sharply escalates conflict in front of stakeholders. Abruptly ending the meeting avoids the trigger but abandons the forum where trust can be repaired, and retreating into silence followed by email lets the accusation stand publicly and moves a relational issue into a colder, easily misread channel.

  35. 35. During a requirements session, a clinician gives a long, winding description of a workflow problem. Before proposing anything, the business analyst restates the problem in her own words and asks the clinician whether the summary captures his intent. Which communication skill is the analyst applying, and why does it matter?

    • A. Feedback solicitation, because she is asking for opinions on her performance
    • B. Nonverbal communication, because tone conveys most meaning
    • C. Active listening, because paraphrasing and confirming understanding prevents requirements from being built on a misinterpretation
    • D. Persuasion, because she is guiding the clinician toward a solution
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: C
    Paraphrasing what a speaker said and checking the interpretation is the core of active listening. In requirements work it catches misunderstandings at the cheapest possible point, before they become misbuilt features. Nonverbal communication concerns body language and tone rather than restating content. Persuasion aims to change someone's position, which is not happening here, and feedback solicitation would seek evaluation of the analyst herself rather than confirmation of the speaker's meaning.

  36. 36. A program spans teams in several countries, and the project manager notices that a regional office repeatedly misses planning sessions scheduled during its national holidays and late-evening hours. Team members there have begun disengaging. What should the project manager do?

    • A. Ask the regional members to individually adjust their personal schedules to attend
    • B. Require all regions to adopt headquarters' calendar and business hours for consistency
    • C. Exclude the region from planning sessions and send them decisions afterward
    • D. Incorporate regional calendars into scheduling, rotate meeting times across time zones, and build shared cultural awareness within the team
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: D
    Global teams require deliberate cultural awareness: honoring regional holidays, rotating the burden of inconvenient hours, and building mutual understanding keeps all locations engaged as full participants. Imposing headquarters' calendar signals that one region's norms outrank the others and deepens disengagement. Excluding a region from planning turns contributors into passive recipients and loses their input, and pushing the accommodation onto individuals treats a structural scheduling problem as a personal failing.

  37. 37. At the end of each quarter, a project manager evaluates how much the team's technical competencies, collaboration, and cross-training have improved, separate from whether deliverables are on schedule. Which purpose does this evaluation serve?

    • A. It fulfills the organization's payroll compliance requirements
    • B. It replaces earned value reporting for the quarter
    • C. It determines contract penalties for underperforming vendors
    • D. It assesses team effectiveness and development so the manager can target training, coaching, and team-building actions
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: D
    Team performance assessments look at the team itself: skill growth, collaboration quality, turnover, and cohesion, so that leaders can act on development needs through training, coaching, or team-building. They complement, rather than replace, project performance measures like earned value, which track work results instead of team capability. Payroll compliance is an organizational HR function outside the assessment's purpose, and vendor penalties are governed by contract terms, not internal team development reviews.

  38. 38. A team entering a six-week stabilization push before a major go-live is currently scattered across two floors, and the project manager is offered a dedicated room where the whole team can sit together with visible boards and immediate access to one another. What is the strongest argument for accepting?

    • A. It reduces facility costs by consolidating desk space
    • B. It guarantees the go-live date will be met
    • C. Colocation during an intense phase accelerates informal communication and rapid issue resolution when interaction needs are highest
    • D. It allows the project manager to monitor attendance more closely
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: C
    Colocating a team, sometimes called a war room, maximizes osmotic and face-to-face communication precisely when fast coordination matters most, such as a stabilization push where issues must be raised and resolved within minutes. The value is communication speed and shared situational awareness, not real estate savings, which are incidental at best. No seating arrangement can guarantee a date, and framing the room as an attendance-monitoring tool mistakes surveillance for the collaboration benefit that justifies the move.

  39. 39. A veteran integration specialist retires in four months, and much of what she knows about the legacy interfaces exists only in her head. Documentation exists but is acknowledged to be incomplete. What is the most effective knowledge transfer strategy?

    • A. Pair her with successors on live work, hold facilitated knowledge-sharing sessions, and supplement the documentation as gaps surface
    • B. Ask her to spend her final four months writing documents full-time in isolation
    • C. Record a single exit interview on her last day for the archive
    • D. Rely on the existing documentation since some coverage already exists
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Tacit knowledge, the judgment and context in an expert's head, transfers best through interaction: working side by side on real problems, guided discussion, and iteratively capturing what surfaces. Documentation alone captures only explicit knowledge, so writing in isolation for four months would still miss the undocumented judgment while removing her from the work. A last-day interview is far too late and shallow, and relying on documentation already known to be incomplete simply accepts the loss.

  40. 40. A supplier's delivery lead insists on a schedule extension while the project manager needs the original date held. In their negotiation, the project manager asks questions and learns the supplier's real concern is a quality-inspection bottleneck, not total duration. The parties agree the project will lend an inspector, keeping the date intact. What negotiation principle does this outcome illustrate?

    • A. Anchoring the discussion with an aggressive opening position
    • B. Conceding early to preserve the long-term relationship
    • C. Using formal authority to overrule the supplier's objection
    • D. Exploring underlying interests rather than stated positions to find a mutually beneficial solution
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: D
    The stated positions, extend versus hold the date, were incompatible, but the underlying interests, adequate inspection capacity versus schedule protection, were not. By probing for the interest behind the position, the manager found an integrative solution that satisfied both parties. Anchoring and authority-based overruling are positional tactics that would have escalated the standoff, and early concession would have sacrificed the project's date without discovering that a cheaper, better option existed.

  41. 41. In a balanced matrix organization, a project manager needs a database administrator from another department to prioritize the project's index-tuning request, but has no formal authority over that person. Which influence approach is most likely to succeed?

    • A. Copy the administrator's manager on escalating emails until the work is done
    • B. Offer to conceal a past mistake by the administrator in exchange for the favor
    • C. Issue a written directive citing the project charter's authority
    • D. Build the relationship, explain how the request supports shared organizational goals, and rely on expertise and reciprocity rather than command
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: D
    Where formal authority is limited, influence comes from relationships, credibility, shared goals, and reciprocity. Framing the request around mutual organizational benefit earns willing cooperation that outlasts a single favor. Directives citing the charter overstate a project manager's power in a balanced matrix and invite resistance. Escalating email pressure damages the relationship and often slows cooperation, and trading silence about a mistake is unethical conduct that violates professional integrity outright.

  42. 42. An agile team is described as self-organizing, and a newly assigned project manager wonders what her role should be in daily task assignment. What best describes her responsibility toward this team?

    • A. Step away entirely and provide no direction of any kind
    • B. Provide vision, priorities, and boundaries, and let the team decide who does which tasks and how the work is organized
    • C. Review and approve the team's internal task allocations before work proceeds
    • D. Assign every task each morning so members do not waste time deciding
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    With a self-organizing team, the leader supplies the what and the why, objectives, priorities, constraints, and support, while the team owns the how, including internal task distribution. This preserves the ownership and adaptability that make such teams effective. Assigning tasks daily or approving internal allocations reinstates command-and-control and undermines self-organization, while complete withdrawal is a misreading: the team still needs clear goals, boundaries, and impediment removal from its leader.

  43. 43. During a daily sync, a developer mentions that the team has been waiting three days for access credentials to the performance-testing environment, and the work is now blocking a sprint commitment. What should the project manager do?

    • A. Tell the developer to find a workaround on his own machine
    • B. Extend the sprint to accommodate the delay
    • C. Note the delay and wait for the infrastructure group to process the request in normal order
    • D. Treat the access delay as an impediment and actively pursue its resolution with the responsible group that day
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: D
    Removing impediments is a central servant-leadership duty: a blocked commitment caused by an external dependency calls for the leader to intervene immediately with the group that can clear it. Passively waiting lets a solvable delay consume the sprint. Pushing the problem back onto the developer ignores that the blocker is organizational, not technical, and stretching the sprint corrupts the timebox and hides the systemic access problem instead of fixing it.

  44. 44. A department manager whose staff will use the new system has stopped attending demos and privately tells colleagues the project will fail. Her cooperation is essential for user acceptance testing in two months. What should the project manager do first?

    • A. Remove her from the stakeholder register since she is disengaged
    • B. Meet with her one-on-one to understand her concerns before deciding how to re-engage her
    • C. Report her negativity to the sponsor and request she be ordered to cooperate
    • D. Proceed without her and plan acceptance testing around other departments
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    Resistance usually has a reason, unaddressed concerns, past exclusion, or perceived threat, and the manager cannot craft an effective engagement strategy without first understanding it, which a private conversation reveals. Removing an essential stakeholder from the register denies reality rather than managing it. Coerced cooperation via the sponsor produces compliance without commitment and often deepens resistance, and planning around her merely postpones the collision until acceptance testing, when it is costliest.

  45. 45. A chief operations officer tells a project manager that the weekly twelve-page status packet is useless to her, though she still wants to stay informed about the project's health. How should the project manager respond?

    • A. Adapt the communication to her needs, such as a brief dashboard of key indicators, decisions needed, and top risks
    • B. Continue the full packet, since consistent reporting to all stakeholders is a best practice
    • C. Stop reporting to her entirely and rely on her to ask questions
    • D. Forward the raw project schedule and issue log so she can extract what she needs
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Communications should be tailored to each stakeholder's needs, preferences, and available attention; a senior executive typically wants a concise, decision-oriented view rather than exhaustive detail. Updating the communications approach for her keeps her informed and engaged. Persisting with a rejected format mistakes uniformity for quality. Ceasing communication invites surprise and disengagement from a key stakeholder, and dumping raw artifacts shifts the synthesis burden onto the audience, the opposite of effective reporting.

  46. 46. A project manager observes a team member repeatedly interrupt colleagues and dismiss their ideas during design sessions, and other members have begun to stay silent. How should the project manager deliver feedback to the interrupting team member?

    • A. Privately and promptly, describing the specific observed behavior and its effect on the team, and agreeing on a change
    • B. During the next design session, so the whole team witnesses the correction
    • C. In the annual performance review, where formal feedback belongs
    • D. Anonymously through a note left on the team channel
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Effective feedback is timely, private, specific to observed behavior, and focused on impact rather than personality, ending with an agreed change. This preserves the recipient's dignity while making the problem and its cost to the team concrete. Public correction humiliates and often entrenches the behavior. Deferring months to a review lets the team's silence harden into norm, and anonymous notes deny the person context or dialogue and erode trust in the manager.

  47. 47. An agile team's working agreement says decisions made in refinement are final unless new information emerges, yet one member routinely reopens settled decisions days later, frustrating the group. Where should this behavior be addressed first?

    • A. In a formal HR complaint filed by the project manager
    • B. By the team itself, revisiting the working agreement in a retrospective and holding one another accountable to it
    • C. By quietly ignoring it, since agreements are only guidelines
    • D. By the sponsor, who has authority over team conduct
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    Working agreements belong to the team, so the team is the right forum to enforce or amend them; a retrospective provides a safe, structured place to name the pattern, confirm or revise the rule, and agree on mutual accountability. Jumping to HR escalates a norms issue into a disciplinary one prematurely. The sponsor governs project direction, not intra-team conduct, and ignoring repeated violations teaches the team its agreements are meaningless, corroding all future norms.

  48. 48. A project team includes three near-retirement specialists with deep legacy-platform expertise and four recent graduates fluent in the target cloud stack, and the two groups rarely interact. What should the project manager do to turn this composition into an advantage?

    • A. Keep the groups separated so each works only within its strength
    • B. Assign the graduates to legacy work exclusively so they learn the old system first
    • C. Deliberately pair members across the two groups on migration tasks so legacy knowledge and cloud skills transfer in both directions
    • D. Encourage the groups to compete for the best migration approach
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: C
    A migration inherently needs both legacy understanding and target-stack fluency, so cross-pairing turns the team's diversity into two-way knowledge transfer while the actual work gets done. Keeping the groups siloed preserves the very gap that threatens the project when the specialists retire. Forcing graduates onto legacy work alone delays the cloud build and wastes their strength, and staged competition breeds rivalry where the deliverable demands integration of both skill sets.

  49. 49. An agile team wants stakeholders and members to absorb current sprint status without attending meetings or requesting reports, so it posts a large, continuously updated board showing sprint goals, task states, and blockers in the team area. What is this practice called?

    • A. A communication blackout, since meetings are eliminated
    • B. A push communication, since information is sent to each stakeholder
    • C. A status audit, since progress is formally verified
    • D. An information radiator, a highly visible display that passively broadcasts current status to anyone who looks
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: D
    An information radiator is a large, visible, continuously current display, physical or digital, that lets anyone absorb status at a glance without asking. It reduces reporting overhead and keeps the whole environment informed passively. It is not push communication, because nothing is transmitted to individuals; observers pull meaning just by looking. No formal verification occurs, so it is not an audit, and communication is being amplified rather than blacked out.

  50. 50. A project manager reviewing a quarter's worth of team disputes wants to anticipate where future conflict is most likely to arise. Based on common patterns in project environments, which sources should the manager watch most closely?

    • A. Personality clashes, which cause the overwhelming majority of project conflict
    • B. Competition over schedules, priorities, and scarce resources, which drive most project conflict more often than personal differences
    • C. Salary disparities among team members
    • D. Differences in preferred documentation templates
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    Most conflict on projects stems from structural pressures: schedule disagreements, competing priorities, and contention over scarce resources such as people and equipment. Personality differences cause a smaller share than commonly assumed, which is why process remedies like clear priorities and resource agreements prevent more conflict than personality management does. Salary structures sit outside the project manager's arena, and template preferences are minor irritants rather than recurring drivers of dispute.

  51. 51. During a difficult replatforming effort, one leader keeps the team focused on why the change matters and paints a picture of the improved future state, while another concentrates on updating the schedule, tracking actions, and administering the budget. How are these two sets of behaviors best characterized?

    • A. The first is micromanagement and the second is delegation
    • B. Both are management; leadership only occurs at the executive level
    • C. The first exemplifies leadership, providing direction and inspiration, while the second exemplifies management, coordinating and administering the work; effective project managers blend both
    • D. Both are leadership; administration is not part of project work
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: C
    Leadership is about vision, alignment, and motivating people through change; management is about planning, coordinating, and administering resources and processes to deliver results. Projects need both, often from the same person at different moments. Leadership is not confined to executives, and disciplined administration is genuine, necessary project work rather than a lesser activity. Neither behavior described is micromanagement, which would mean controlling how individuals perform their tasks in excessive detail.

  52. 52. An executive asks a project manager what distinguishes the organization's best-performing project teams from the rest. Which characteristic should the project manager cite as foundational to high team performance?

    • A. Uniformity of background, which minimizes disagreement
    • B. Competition among members for individual recognition
    • C. Strict hierarchy, so every question has a single decision-maker
    • D. Mutual trust and open communication, which allow members to share problems, take risks, and hold each other accountable
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: D
    High-performing teams are built on trust and open communication: members surface problems early, admit mistakes, challenge each other constructively, and commit to shared goals. Without that foundation, other practices underperform. Homogeneity reduces friction but also removes the diverse perspectives that improve decisions. Internal competition for recognition discourages the very information-sharing that trust enables, and rigid hierarchy slows decisions and suppresses the initiative that distinguishes strong teams.

Process

28 questions
  1. 53. A project is using a predictive approach and the project manager is finalizing the WBS with the team. A team member argues that a work package is too large to estimate accurately. What is the best resolution?

    • A. Accept the estimate as-is since the WBS has already been approved by the sponsor
    • B. Decompose the work package further until each component can be estimated with reasonable confidence
    • C. Assign an arbitrary duration to keep the schedule on track
    • D. Remove the work package from the WBS entirely to simplify planning
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    When a work package cannot be estimated confidently, the correct response in decomposition is to break it down further into smaller, more manageable components until estimates become reliable, which is the core purpose of progressive WBS decomposition. Accepting an unreliable estimate risks poor planning. Assigning an arbitrary duration introduces unfounded schedule risk. Removing needed scope from the WBS creates a scope gap rather than solving the estimation problem.

  2. 54. A project manager is defining acceptance criteria for a deliverable in a predictive project. The sponsor insists criteria be finalized only after the deliverable is complete, to 'stay flexible.' Why should the project manager push back on this approach?

    • A. Acceptance criteria have no bearing on scope validation in predictive projects
    • B. Defining acceptance criteria upfront ensures scope clarity and reduces the risk of disputes during scope validation
    • C. Acceptance criteria are only relevant for adaptive projects, not predictive ones
    • D. Finalizing criteria after completion speeds up the schedule with no drawbacks
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    In predictive projects, acceptance criteria should be defined during planning so the team knows the target and disputes are minimized at validation; waiting until after completion creates ambiguity and rework risk. Criteria absolutely matter to scope validation, so option A is wrong. Acceptance criteria apply to both predictive and adaptive approaches, not just adaptive. Deferring criteria does not speed the schedule; it typically causes costly rework and disagreement.

  3. 55. A project's cost performance index (CPI) is 0.85 and schedule performance index (SPI) is 1.05 at the midpoint of execution. What does this combination most likely indicate?

    • A. The project is ahead of schedule but spending more than planned for the work completed
    • B. The project is behind schedule and under budget
    • C. The project is exactly on track for both cost and schedule
    • D. The project has no earned value data available yet
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    An SPI above 1.0 indicates the project is ahead of schedule, while a CPI below 1.0 indicates cost inefficiency — more is being spent than the value of work completed. This combination is neither on track for both metrics nor behind schedule, and clearly earned value data exists since both indices are calculated. This scenario is common when a team accelerates the schedule by adding resources, increasing cost.

  4. 56. A project manager is developing the risk management plan and needs to determine how the team will categorize and prioritize identified risks. Which tool is most appropriate for this purpose?

    • A. A risk breakdown structure (RBS) combined with a probability and impact matrix
    • B. A resource histogram showing team utilization over time
    • C. A responsibility assignment matrix (RACI chart)
    • D. A control chart tracking process variation
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    A risk breakdown structure organizes risks into categories, and a probability and impact matrix helps prioritize them by likelihood and severity, directly supporting risk categorization and prioritization. A resource histogram addresses staffing allocation, not risk categorization. A RACI chart clarifies roles and responsibilities. A control chart is a quality management tool for monitoring process stability, unrelated to risk prioritization.

  5. 57. During execution, a quality inspection reveals that a batch of deliverables fails to meet specifications due to a flawed manufacturing process. The project manager wants to identify the underlying cause rather than just the symptom. Which technique is most appropriate?

    • A. A fishbone (Ishikawa) diagram to explore root causes across categories such as people, process, and equipment
    • B. A Gantt chart to review the sequencing of manufacturing tasks
    • C. A stakeholder engagement assessment matrix
    • D. A resource calendar to check equipment availability only
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    A fishbone diagram is specifically designed for root cause analysis by systematically exploring contributing categories like people, process, methods, and equipment. A Gantt chart shows scheduling and sequencing, not causal analysis. A stakeholder engagement matrix addresses stakeholder attitudes, not quality defects. Checking only equipment availability ignores other potential causal categories and is too narrow for root cause analysis.

  6. 58. A project manager is closing out a project phase and needs to formally document that deliverables meet the acceptance criteria agreed upon with the customer. Which process is being performed?

    • A. Validate Scope
    • B. Control Quality
    • C. Define Scope
    • D. Plan Scope Management
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Validate Scope is the process of formalizing acceptance of completed deliverables with the customer or sponsor. Control Quality focuses on inspecting and verifying deliverables meet quality standards, usually before validation occurs. Define Scope establishes the detailed project and product scope during planning. Plan Scope Management sets out how scope will be defined, validated, and controlled, but does not itself perform acceptance.

  7. 59. A project manager is using rolling wave planning on a multi-year infrastructure project. Which statement best describes why this approach was selected?

    • A. It allows near-term work to be planned in detail while far-term work remains at a higher level until more information is available
    • B. It requires all activities for the entire project to be fully detailed at the outset
    • C. It eliminates the need for a work breakdown structure
    • D. It is only applicable to purely adaptive projects and never to predictive ones
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Rolling wave planning progressively elaborates near-term work in detail while leaving distant work at a summary level, which suits long-duration projects where future details are uncertain. It does not require full upfront detail for the entire project — that would defeat its purpose. It still uses a WBS, just at varying levels of decomposition. It is a form of progressive elaboration usable in predictive projects, not exclusive to adaptive ones.

  8. 60. A team using an adaptive approach completes a two-week iteration and holds a session to reflect on what went well, what did not, and what to change. What is this session called and what is its primary purpose?

    • A. A retrospective, used to continuously improve team process and collaboration
    • B. A sprint review, used to demonstrate the product increment to stakeholders
    • C. A daily standup, used to synchronize daily work
    • D. A backlog refinement session, used to reprioritize upcoming work
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    A retrospective's primary purpose is continuous process improvement by reflecting on what went well, what didn't, and what to change going forward. A sprint review focuses on demonstrating the product increment to stakeholders for feedback, not team process reflection. A daily standup is a brief synchronization meeting on daily progress. Backlog refinement focuses on clarifying and reprioritizing backlog items, not team retrospection.

  9. 61. A project manager discovers during monitoring that a approved change request was implemented but never updated in the schedule baseline. What is the most appropriate corrective action?

    • A. Ignore the discrepancy since the work is already complete
    • B. Update the schedule baseline through the integrated change control process to reflect the approved change
    • C. Create an entirely new project schedule from scratch
    • D. Instruct the team to revert the implemented change to match the outdated baseline
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    The correct action is to formally update the baseline through integrated change control so that future performance measurement reflects the approved change accurately. Ignoring the discrepancy corrupts variance analysis going forward. Rebuilding the entire schedule is excessive when only a baseline update is needed. Reverting completed, approved work to match an outdated baseline wastes effort and contradicts the approved decision.

  10. 62. A project manager wants to determine the most likely project duration by using three-point estimates (optimistic, most likely, pessimistic) for key activities. Which technique should be applied?

    • A. Monte Carlo simulation using PERT-based three-point estimates
    • B. A single-point analogous estimate based on a similar past project
    • C. A fixed-price contract estimate from a vendor proposal
    • D. A resource leveling heuristic
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Monte Carlo simulation uses three-point (PERT) estimates across many iterations to model a probabilistic range of project durations, which is exactly what's needed here. Analogous estimating uses a single historical comparison rather than three-point ranges. A vendor's fixed-price proposal is a procurement input, not an internal estimating technique. Resource leveling addresses resource conflicts and schedule adjustments, not duration estimation from three-point data.

  11. 63. A project team is deciding between a predictive and a hybrid approach for a product with well-understood requirements but an uncertain regulatory environment for one specific module. Which strategy best fits this situation?

    • A. Use a fully predictive approach for the entire project since most requirements are well understood
    • B. Use a hybrid approach: predictive planning for the well-understood scope and an adaptive approach for the uncertain regulatory module
    • C. Use a fully adaptive approach for the entire project regardless of how well requirements are understood
    • D. Avoid iterative techniques entirely since the project has any predictive elements at all
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    A hybrid approach lets teams apply predictive methods where scope is stable and adaptive iteration where uncertainty is high, matching the mixed nature of this project. A fully predictive approach ignores the regulatory uncertainty that benefits from iterative discovery. A fully adaptive approach adds unnecessary overhead to the well-understood portions. Rejecting iterative techniques outright discards a tool well-suited to the uncertain module.

  12. 64. A project manager is calculating the estimate at completion (EAC) for a project that is expected to continue at its current cost performance rate. Which formula is most appropriate?

    • A. EAC = AC + (BAC − EV)
    • B. EAC = BAC / CPI
    • C. EAC = AC + BAC
    • D. EAC = EV − AC
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    When future work is expected to continue at the same cost efficiency observed to date, EAC = BAC / CPI is the correct formula, projecting total cost based on current performance. EAC = AC + (BAC − EV) assumes atypical variances will not recur, which is a different scenario. EAC = AC + BAC is not a valid earned value formula. EV − AC calculates cost variance, not an estimate at completion.

  13. 65. A definition of done is established by an adaptive team. What does it prevent?

    • A. Work being reported as complete while testing, documentation or integration remain outstanding, which would accumulate as hidden unfinished work
    • B. Stakeholders requesting changes to completed work
    • C. The team estimating work inaccurately
    • D. The project exceeding its budget
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    A shared completion standard makes progress reporting honest, since without it a team can appear on track while carrying a growing tail of nearly-finished work. That accumulation typically surfaces late in the project as an unexpected integration and testing effort.

  14. 66. A project is executed in a predictive life cycle. What characterizes it relative to an adaptive one?

    • A. Scope is defined early and changes are managed through a formal process, which suits stable requirements and known solutions
    • B. Scope emerges through iterations with frequent re-prioritization
    • C. No planning is performed before execution begins
    • D. Change is prohibited entirely once the plan is baselined
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Predictive approaches invest heavily in early definition and control change formally, which suits work where requirements are stable and the solution is understood. Change is managed rather than prohibited, and hybrid approaches apply predictive planning to stable components while running uncertain elements adaptively.

  15. 67. A change request is raised that would increase scope. What must occur before work begins on it?

    • A. Assessment of the impact on schedule, cost, quality and risk, then a decision by the authorized body, with approved changes updating the baseline
    • B. Immediate implementation, with documentation completed afterward
    • C. Rejection by default, since scope changes are not permitted
    • D. Approval by the requesting stakeholder alone
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Integrated change control exists so the full impact is understood before commitment and so the baseline remains a meaningful measure of performance. Implementing first and documenting later, sometimes called scope creep when it happens incrementally, destroys the baseline's usefulness and hides the accumulating cost.

  16. 68. Earned value reporting shows a cost performance index of 0.85 and a schedule performance index of 1.05. What does this indicate?

    • A. The project is over budget for the work completed but ahead of schedule
    • B. The project is under budget and behind schedule
    • C. The project is both over budget and behind schedule
    • D. The project is both under budget and ahead of schedule
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    An index below 1.0 indicates unfavourable performance and above 1.0 favourable, so 0.85 means 85 cents of value earned per dollar spent while 1.05 means work is progressing faster than planned. The combination often indicates resources were added or overtime worked to accelerate delivery, which is a deliberate trade rather than a contradiction.

  17. 69. A project has a budget at completion of $500,000, has earned value of $200,000 and actual cost of $250,000. What is the cost variance?

    • A. Negative $50,000, indicating the project has spent $50,000 more than the value delivered
    • B. Positive $50,000, indicating a favourable position
    • C. Negative $300,000, being budget at completion minus earned value
    • D. Zero, since earned value and actual cost are both below budget
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Cost variance is earned value minus actual cost, so 200,000 minus 250,000 gives negative 50,000, and a negative variance is always unfavourable. Comparing spending against the total budget rather than against value earned is the common error, since being under the total budget says nothing about efficiency at this point in the work.

  18. 70. A network diagram shows the critical path. What does it represent?

    • A. The longest sequence of dependent activities determining the shortest possible project duration, where activities have zero float
    • B. The sequence of the most expensive activities
    • C. The sequence of activities assigned to the most senior staff
    • D. The shortest path through the network
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Delay on a critical path activity delays the project directly because there is no float to absorb it, which is why these activities receive the closest attention. Near-critical paths matter too, since a small delay can make them critical, and a network can have more than one critical path simultaneously.

  19. 71. A schedule must be compressed without reducing scope. What distinguishes crashing from fast tracking?

    • A. Crashing adds resources to critical activities increasing cost, while fast tracking overlaps activities previously sequential, increasing risk and potential rework
    • B. Crashing overlaps activities and fast tracking adds resources
    • C. Both reduce the project's scope
    • D. Both reduce cost as well as duration
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    The two techniques trade different currencies, cost for crashing and risk for fast tracking, so the choice depends on which the project can better absorb. Neither is free, and crashing is subject to diminishing returns since adding people to an activity does not reduce its duration proportionally.

  20. 72. A risk is identified with high probability and high impact on a critical objective. Which response strategy eliminates the threat entirely?

    • A. Avoid, by changing the plan so the risk's cause no longer applies to the project
    • B. Mitigate, by reducing probability or impact
    • C. Transfer, by shifting the impact to a third party
    • D. Accept, by acknowledging it without action
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Avoidance removes the exposure by altering the plan, such as changing an approach or excluding a scope element, while mitigation only reduces it. Escalation is the further option where the risk falls outside the project's authority, and it belongs to the programme or organizational level rather than being managed within the project.

  21. 73. A risk register entry describes an opportunity rather than a threat. Which response strategies apply?

    • A. Exploit, enhance, share, accept and escalate, mirroring the threat strategies with the intent of increasing rather than decreasing the effect
    • B. Only accept, since opportunities require no management
    • C. The same strategies as threats with identical names
    • D. Only avoid and mitigate
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Exploit ensures the opportunity is realized, enhance increases its probability or impact, and share allocates it to a party better able to capture it, mirroring avoid, mitigate and transfer. Treating risk management as threat-only means opportunities that could improve outcomes are never deliberately pursued.

  22. 74. A contingency reserve is established. What is it intended to cover?

    • A. Identified risks that have been analysed, and it sits within the cost baseline under the project manager's authority
    • B. Unknown risks outside the baseline, controlled by management
    • C. Approved scope changes only
    • D. Routine operating expenses of the project team
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Contingency reserves address known risks and sit inside the cost baseline, while management reserves address unknown unknowns, sit outside the baseline and require management approval to access. Conflating the two produces either a project manager unable to respond to an anticipated risk or one spending an organizational buffer without authority.

  23. 75. A quality management approach distinguishes prevention from inspection. What is the practical implication?

    • A. Preventing defects is generally less costly than detecting and correcting them, so quality is built in rather than inspected in
    • B. Inspection eliminates the need for prevention activities
    • C. Prevention and inspection cost the same
    • D. Neither is necessary where the team is experienced
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    The cost of quality framework separates prevention and appraisal costs from internal and external failure costs, with external failure by far the most expensive since a defect reaching the customer carries reputational and remediation cost. This asymmetry is why investment shifts toward prevention.

  24. 76. Quality assurance and quality control are distinguished. What does each address?

    • A. Assurance applies only after project closure
    • B. Both inspect the same deliverables at different times
    • C. Assurance inspects deliverables and control audits processes
    • D. Assurance audits whether processes are adequate and being followed, while control inspects deliverables against requirements
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: D
    Assurance is process-focused and preventive while control is product-focused and detective, which is why a project can pass control inspections while its processes remain incapable of consistently producing conforming output. Both are needed since a good process still requires verification of what it produced.

  25. 77. An adaptive team holds a retrospective at the end of each iteration. What is its purpose?

    • A. Inspecting how the team worked and agreeing specific improvements to try next iteration, which is distinct from reviewing the product delivered
    • B. Demonstrating completed work to stakeholders for feedback
    • C. Planning the next iteration's scope
    • D. Evaluating individual team members' performance
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    The retrospective examines process while the review examines product, and conflating them means one of the two questions goes unasked. A retrospective producing no committed action is the common failure, since discussion without a specific change to try leaves the team repeating the same conversation.

  26. 78. A team's velocity is measured over several iterations. What is it appropriate to use it for?

    • A. Forecasting how much that team can complete in future iterations, not comparing teams or assessing individual productivity
    • B. Comparing the productivity of different teams
    • C. Setting individual performance targets
    • D. Determining team members' compensation
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Estimates are relative to a team's own reference points, so velocity is not comparable across teams and using it as a target reliably produces estimate inflation rather than more delivery. Its legitimate value is forecasting range for the team that produced it, which is why trend and variability matter more than any single iteration's figure.

  27. 79. A project's stakeholder identifies a requirement late in an adaptive project. How is it handled?

    • A. Added to the backlog and prioritized against existing items, since accommodating change is expected and the constraint is capacity rather than the plan
    • B. Rejected because the plan was already agreed
    • C. Added to the current iteration immediately regardless of commitment
    • D. Escalated to the sponsor for a formal change request
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Adaptive approaches welcome change and manage it through prioritization, so the new item competes with existing ones rather than being added on top. Injecting work into a committed iteration undermines the team's ability to deliver what it committed to, which is why the change enters at the next prioritization point.

  28. 80. A project is being closed. What must occur regardless of whether it completed successfully or was terminated early?

    • A. Formal closure activities including releasing resources, closing procurements, obtaining acceptance where applicable and recording lessons learned
    • B. Closure activities only where the project delivered its objectives
    • C. Transfer of the project manager to a new project without further action
    • D. Retention of all resources until the next project begins
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Terminated projects require closure precisely because the reasons for termination are the most valuable lessons available, and unclosed procurements and unreleased resources continue to consume organizational capacity. Archiving records also matters where contractual or regulatory obligations survive the project.

Business Environment

20 questions
  1. 81. A project manager reviewing a vendor contract notices ambiguous language about ownership of intellectual property created during the engagement. What is the best course of action before work begins?

    • A. Proceed with the contract as-is and address IP disputes if they arise later
    • B. Work with procurement and legal to clarify IP ownership terms in the contract before execution begins
    • C. Assume the organization automatically owns all IP regardless of contract wording
    • D. Let the vendor unilaterally decide IP ownership once deliverables are complete
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    Ambiguous contractual terms, especially around IP ownership, should be clarified with procurement and legal before work begins to prevent costly disputes later. Proceeding without clarification invites disputes that are harder to resolve after work is underway. Assuming automatic ownership without contractual basis is legally risky. Allowing the vendor to unilaterally decide ownership abdicates the organization's contractual rights.

  2. 82. A company launches a project explicitly to comply with a new environmental regulation that takes effect in six months. Which category of business need does this project primarily address?

    • A. A market demand opportunity
    • B. A legal or regulatory requirement
    • C. A customer request unrelated to compliance
    • D. An internal process improvement with no external driver
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    Projects initiated to meet legal or regulatory mandates are driven by compliance requirements, which is clearly the case here given the explicit regulatory deadline. Market demand refers to responding to competitive or customer trends, not compliance. This project is not driven by a specific customer request. It is externally mandated by regulation, not simply an internally originated process improvement.

  3. 83. A project manager is evaluating whether a proposed project aligns with organizational strategy. Which document should be reviewed first to make this determination?

    • A. The project's detailed risk register
    • B. The organization's strategic plan and business case for the project
    • C. The team's daily stand-up notes
    • D. The vendor's technical proposal
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    The organizational strategic plan and the project's business case directly articulate how the project supports broader organizational goals, making them the correct starting point for this evaluation. A risk register addresses uncertainties, not strategic alignment. Daily stand-up notes cover operational execution details, not strategy. A vendor's technical proposal addresses solution delivery, not organizational strategic fit.

  4. 84. A project manager calculates that a proposed initiative has a benefit-cost ratio (BCR) of 0.8. What does this indicate about the initiative's financial viability?

    • A. The benefits exceed the costs, making it a strong investment
    • B. The costs exceed the benefits, suggesting the initiative may not be financially justified
    • C. The benefits and costs are exactly equal
    • D. BCR cannot be used to evaluate project viability
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    A BCR below 1.0 means costs exceed benefits, indicating the initiative is not financially justified on a pure cost-benefit basis. A BCR above 1.0, not below, would indicate benefits exceed costs favorably. A BCR of exactly 1.0, not 0.8, would indicate benefits and costs are equal. BCR is in fact a standard, commonly used tool for evaluating project financial viability.

  5. 85. An organization is deciding between two mutually exclusive projects using net present value (NPV) analysis. Project A has an NPV of $150,000 and Project B has an NPV of $95,000, with similar risk profiles. Which project should generally be prioritized based on this data alone?

    • A. Project B, because a lower NPV indicates lower risk exposure
    • B. Project A, because a higher NPV indicates greater expected value creation
    • C. Neither project, because NPV cannot be used to compare mutually exclusive projects
    • D. Both projects equally, since NPV should be ignored in project selection
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    When comparing mutually exclusive projects with similar risk profiles, the one with the higher NPV is generally preferred because it is expected to create more value in present-value terms. A lower NPV does not inherently mean lower risk—NPV measures value, not risk, so this reasoning is flawed. NPV is in fact a standard and appropriate tool for comparing mutually exclusive investment options. Dismissing NPV entirely ignores a foundational financial selection method.

  6. 86. A project manager is assessing whether continued investment in a struggling project is still justified after significant funds have already been spent. Which principle should guide this decision?

    • A. Continue funding the project because of the amount already invested (the sunk cost fallacy)
    • B. Evaluate the decision based on future costs and benefits only, since past costs are sunk and irrecoverable
    • C. Always cancel any project that has exceeded its original budget
    • D. Defer the decision indefinitely to avoid political conflict
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    Sound decision-making treats sunk costs as irrelevant to future decisions; the project should be evaluated on the incremental future costs and benefits going forward. Continuing to fund based on prior investment is the sunk cost fallacy and leads to poor decisions. Automatically canceling any over-budget project ignores potential future value and context. Indefinite deferral avoids making a necessary business decision and can compound losses.

  7. 87. A project manager learns midway through execution that a new corporate policy requires all vendor payments to route through a centralized procurement platform. Which type of organizational process asset (OPA) update does this represent?

    • A. A change to project-specific technical specifications
    • B. An update to organizational policies and procedures affecting how the project must operate
    • C. A change to the project's individual risk register only
    • D. A revision to the team's working agreements exclusively
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    A new corporate-wide policy about vendor payment routing is an organizational process asset update reflecting a change in policies and procedures that projects must follow. It is not a technical specification specific to the deliverable. It may generate a risk to track, but the underlying change itself is a policy/procedure update, not merely a risk register entry. It also is not limited to the team's own working agreements, since it is imposed organization-wide.

  8. 88. A project manager is evaluating enterprise environmental factors (EEFs) that could influence project planning. Which of the following is the best example of an EEF?

    • A. The organization's lessons learned repository from prior projects
    • B. Government regulations and marketplace conditions relevant to the project's industry
    • C. A standardized project charter template used across the organization
    • D. The organization's historical risk register templates
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    Enterprise environmental factors include external conditions such as government regulations and marketplace conditions that the organization does not control but must plan around. A lessons learned repository, charter template, and historical risk register templates are all organizational process assets—internal, organization-controlled artifacts—rather than external environmental factors.

  9. 89. A project manager is asked to justify a project using a return on investment (ROI) analysis. The finance team notes the project has a payback period of 4 years against an organizational threshold of 3 years. What is the most appropriate interpretation?

    • A. The project automatically qualifies for approval since ROI was calculated at all
    • B. The project exceeds the organization's payback threshold and may require further justification or rejection based on this criterion
    • C. Payback period is irrelevant once ROI is calculated
    • D. A longer payback period is always preferable to a shorter one
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    A payback period exceeding the organizational threshold signals the project does not meet the standard financial criteria and needs additional justification or may be rejected. Simply calculating ROI does not automatically qualify a project for approval regardless of other financial metrics. Payback period remains a distinct and relevant financial criterion even when ROI is also calculated. A shorter payback period is generally preferred because it returns invested capital faster, not the reverse.

  10. 90. A project manager is preparing a project charter and must identify the business justification for undertaking the work. Which of the following best belongs in this section?

    • A. A detailed task-level schedule with resource assignments
    • B. A summary of the business case, including why the project is being pursued and its expected value
    • C. The full technical requirements specification
    • D. A list of every individual risk with mitigation plans
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    The business justification section of a charter summarizes the business case—why the project is worth doing and what value it delivers—providing high-level rationale for sponsorship and funding. A detailed task-level schedule belongs in the schedule management outputs, not the charter's justification section. Full technical requirements are developed later in scope and requirements documentation. A comprehensive risk list with mitigations belongs in the risk register, not the charter's business justification.

  11. 91. A project manager identifies that a competitor recently released a similar product, changing the market landscape mid-project. What should the project manager do first in response to this external change?

    • A. Assess the impact on the business case and consult the sponsor about whether project objectives still hold
    • B. Immediately halt all project work without informing stakeholders
    • C. Ignore external market changes since they are outside the project's control
    • D. Unilaterally change the project's scope to match the competitor's product
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    The appropriate first step is to assess how the external change affects the business case and consult the sponsor, since strategic direction changes require sponsor and governance involvement. Halting work unilaterally without communication is an overreaction absent sponsor guidance. Ignoring a material market shift risks pursuing an outdated or non-viable business case. Unilaterally changing scope bypasses governance and change control processes.

  12. 92. A stakeholder with high power and high interest is identified during stakeholder analysis. According to standard stakeholder engagement guidance, how should this stakeholder generally be managed?

    • A. Monitor with minimal effort
    • B. Manage closely with frequent, proactive engagement
    • C. Keep informed with minimal engagement effort
    • D. Ignore unless they raise concerns directly
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    High power, high interest stakeholders should be managed closely with frequent, proactive engagement because they have both the influence and the motivation to significantly affect the project. Monitoring with minimal effort is appropriate for low power, low interest stakeholders, not this group. Keeping informed with minimal effort suits low power, high interest stakeholders. Ignoring a high power, high interest stakeholder risks major disruption to the project.

  13. 93. During project initiation, the project manager and sponsor disagree on whether a proposed initiative should proceed given uncertain market conditions. Which artifact should primarily guide this go/no-go decision?

    • A. The team's daily standup log
    • B. The business case, updated with current assumptions and expected benefits
    • C. The most recent sprint retrospective notes
    • D. The project's communication management plan
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: B
    The business case, refreshed with current assumptions and expected benefits, is the primary artifact for evaluating whether a project should proceed under changed conditions. A daily standup log tracks day-to-day execution details, not strategic viability. Sprint retrospective notes address team process improvement, not go/no-go investment decisions. A communication management plan governs information flow, not the financial or strategic justification for proceeding.

  14. 94. A contract is awarded as firm fixed price. Who bears the risk of cost overruns?

    • A. The seller, which is why this type suits well-defined scope and typically carries a higher price reflecting the risk premium
    • B. The buyer, who reimburses actual costs incurred
    • C. The risk is shared equally regardless of scope definition
    • D. Neither party, since overruns are prohibited by the contract
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Fixed price transfers cost risk to the seller, which prices that risk into the bid, whereas cost-reimbursable contracts leave the risk with the buyer and suit uncertain scope. Using fixed price for poorly defined scope produces either an inflated price or a stream of change orders, which reintroduces the risk the structure was meant to transfer.

  15. 95. A project must demonstrate alignment with organizational strategy. What establishes this?

    • A. The business case, which states the need, expected benefits and how they support strategic objectives, and which is revisited as conditions change
    • B. The project schedule showing the delivery date
    • C. The resource assignment matrix
    • D. The risk register
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    The business case is the justification for the investment and the reference against which continued viability is judged, so a project whose case no longer holds should be stopped rather than completed. Revisiting it matters because organizational strategy and market conditions change during long projects.

  16. 96. A benefits realization plan is prepared. What does it address that the project plan does not?

    • A. How and when benefits will be measured and by whom after delivery, since benefits usually accrue after the project closes
    • B. The sequence of project activities
    • C. The assignment of team members to tasks
    • D. The procurement of project materials
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Projects deliver outputs while benefits arise from using them, which usually occurs after the team has disbanded, so ownership and measurement must be assigned explicitly. Without this, organizations complete projects successfully and never establish whether the investment was worthwhile.

  17. 97. A project faces a newly announced regulatory requirement affecting its deliverable. What is the appropriate response?

    • A. Assess the impact on scope, schedule, cost and risk, and process it through change control, since compliance is not optional but its implementation must still be managed
    • B. Implement the required changes immediately outside change control
    • C. Defer consideration until the regulation is enforced
    • D. Cancel the project
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    A mandatory requirement removes the decision about whether to comply but not the need to understand and communicate the impact, which change control exists to capture. Bypassing the process leaves the baseline stale and hides the cost and schedule consequence from those accountable for the investment.

  18. 98. An organization operates a project management office. Which type exerts the most control over projects?

    • A. A directive office, which manages the projects directly, compared with controlling offices that require compliance and supportive offices that provide templates and advice
    • B. A supportive office, which mandates methodology
    • C. A controlling office, which manages projects directly
    • D. All types exert identical control
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    The three forms sit on a spectrum from providing resources and templates, through requiring adherence to a framework, to taking direct management of projects. The appropriate form depends on organizational maturity, since a directive office in an organization with capable project managers can add overhead without adding value.

  19. 99. A project manager works in a weak matrix organization. What authority do they typically hold?

    • A. Limited authority with resources controlled by functional managers, so influence and negotiation matter more than positional power
    • B. Full authority over resources and budget
    • C. The same authority as in a projectized organization
    • D. No involvement in resource decisions of any kind
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Authority rises across the spectrum from functional through weak, balanced and strong matrix to projectized, where the project manager controls resources fully. Recognizing the structure matters because a project manager with limited formal authority must secure commitment through influence and relationships rather than direction.

  20. 100. A project manager becomes aware that a team member has misrepresented test results to meet a deadline. What is required?

    • A. Address it directly and report it through the appropriate channel, since honesty and responsibility obligations do not yield to schedule pressure
    • B. Allow it to stand if the deadline is genuinely critical
    • C. Correct the record quietly without addressing the conduct
    • D. Wait until the project completes before raising it
    Show answer & explanation

    Answer: A
    Professional responsibility obligations require honest reporting and addressing violations, and a misrepresented test result exposes the organization and potentially users to consequences that grow the longer it stands. Correcting the record without addressing the conduct leaves the underlying pressure and behaviour in place to recur.

2026 statistics

Key facts: PMP exam

Questions
180
Time limit
4h
Passing score
Pass/Fail
Exam fee
$675

This free PMP practice test has 192 original questions written to Project Management Institute (PMI)'s official content outline, last checked against it on August 6, 2026, 100 of them listed on this page and the rest loaded by the drill. Every question shows a worked explanation, and nothing here requires a signup.

The questions are grouped under three outline areas: People, Process and Business Environment.

As of 2026, the PMP exam fee is $675.

How the PMP practice bank covers the outline

192 questions across 3 outline areas — the same areas the page's sections use.

Counts are the live question bank, grouped by the outline area each question was written to.

192 questions across three outline areas. The largest, Process, holds 91 questions (47%); the page's sections follow the same split.
Exam format and study resources

Get a free PMP study plan

A week-by-week plan plus new practice questions, straight to your inbox.

Official sources

Primary documents used to verify the exam details shown on this page.

Last verified against the official exam content outline:

Frequently asked questions

How many questions are on the PMP exam and how long do I have?

The PMP exam contains 180 questions, of which 10 are unscored pretest questions, so 170 questions actually count toward your result. You get 240 minutes to complete it, and the exam includes two 10-minute breaks. Because 10 questions don't count, it's worth answering every item — you can't tell which ones are pretest, so treat all 180 as if they're scored.

What score do I need to pass the PMP, and how should I plan my study?

PMI does not publish a numeric percentage passing score. The PMP is proficiency-based: your performance is reported per domain as Above Target, Target, Below Target, or Needs Improvement rather than as a single percentage. Since there's no fixed cutoff to chase, focus your prep on reaching solid proficiency across every domain instead of aiming for a specific number — a weak domain can drag down an otherwise strong result.

How is the PMP exam content weighted across domains and approaches?

The exam is organized across 3 domains. Domain I People is 33% of items, Domain II Process is 41%, and Domain III Business Environment is 26% — so Process is the single largest area. By delivery approach, roughly 40% of items reflect predictive project management, and the remaining 60% is split between adaptive/agile and hybrid approaches. Practically, that means you should study more than half your practice questions in an agile or hybrid context, and give Process the most attention since it carries the greatest weight.

What are the eligibility requirements and cost to take the PMP?

The PMP is offered by the Project Management Institute (PMI). To qualify you need at least 35 hours of project management training/education plus a minimum of 36 months (3 years) or 60 months (5 years) of experience leading projects, depending on your education level — and that experience must have been accrued within the last 10 years. The exam fee for non-members is US$675. Eligibility can take up to 24 hours to process before you can schedule, and once certified you renew by submitting 60 PDUs every 3 years. Because there's a processing delay, apply well before you plan to test so a last-minute review doesn't push back your exam date.