Georgia Real Estate Salesperson Practice Exam
161 free Georgia Real Estate Salesperson practice questions with answers and explanations.
No signup required.
The Georgia Real Estate Salesperson exam is administered by the Georgia Real Estate Commission (GREC), with 152 scored questions.
About these practice questions
These are original study questions written from published exam objectives—not recalled, copied, or confidential live-exam items. Always confirm current coverage with the official sources linked on this page.
Browse all questions & answers
Loading the remaining 61 questions…
Property Ownership and Land Use
32 questions1. Three siblings take title to a lake cabin as joint tenants with right of survivorship. Years later, one sibling dies, leaving a will that devises 'my one-third interest in the cabin' to her son. Who owns the cabin after her death?
- A. The two surviving siblings and the son, each holding a one-third interest as tenants in common
- B. The son alone, because a will always overrides the form of co-ownership
- C. The deceased sibling's estate, until the probate court assigns the interest
- D. The two surviving siblings alone, because the deceased sibling's interest passed to them by survivorship
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
In a joint tenancy, the right of survivorship operates automatically at the moment of death: the deceased co-owner's interest vests in the surviving joint tenants and never becomes part of the probate estate. Because the interest never reaches the estate, the will has nothing to act upon, so the devise to the son fails. The idea that a will can defeat survivorship is the classic trap; survivorship is a feature of the title itself, not a matter the decedent can redirect by testament.2. Two investors buy a rental duplex together, one contributing sixty percent of the price and the other forty percent, and their deed reflects those unequal shares with no survivorship language. When the minority owner dies, his will leaves his interest to his daughter. What is the result?
- A. The unequal shares invalidate the co-tenancy, so the property must be sold and the proceeds split
- B. The surviving investor may buy out the daughter at a court-set price before she takes title
- C. The daughter inherits the forty percent interest and becomes a tenant in common with the surviving investor
- D. The daughter receives nothing because co-owners' interests always pass to the surviving owner
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Unequal ownership shares and the absence of survivorship language are hallmarks of a tenancy in common. Each tenant in common holds a distinct, undivided interest that is freely transferable during life and devisable at death, so the daughter steps into her father's forty percent share. Survivorship applies only to joint tenancies, and unequal shares are perfectly valid in a tenancy in common, so neither the forfeiture nor the forced-sale answers describes the law.3. A donor conveys land to a school district 'so long as the land is used for a public school.' Decades later the district closes the school and leases the site to a private warehouse operator. What interest did the donor retain, and what happens now?
- A. A possibility of reverter; title automatically returns to the donor or the donor's heirs when the school use ends
- B. A right of re-entry; the donor must sue within a reasonable time or the district keeps the land
- C. A remainder interest; the land passes to whomever the donor designated as remainderman
- D. No interest; a completed gift of real property cannot be undone by a change in use
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Words of duration such as 'so long as' create a fee simple determinable, and the grantor keeps a possibility of reverter that operates automatically: the instant the stated use ceases, title reverts without any lawsuit or election. A right of re-entry accompanies a fee simple on condition subsequent, which uses conditional language like 'but if' and requires the grantor to act to retake the land. A remainder is a future interest in a third party, not the grantor, so it does not fit these facts.4. A widow deeds her home 'to my sister for life, then to my nephew.' The sister moves in, pays the taxes, and lives there for eleven years before she dies. Immediately upon the sister's death, what is the state of the title?
- A. The property returns to the widow's estate for redistribution to her heirs
- B. The sister's own heirs take the home because she possessed it when she died
- C. The nephew holds fee simple title as the remainderman, with no further action needed
- D. Title is suspended until a probate court decides between the nephew and the sister's heirs
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
The conveyance created a life estate in the sister measured by her own life, with a vested remainder in the nephew. A remainder becomes possessory automatically when the measuring life ends, so at the sister's death the nephew takes fee simple title by operation of law, outside of anyone's probate estate. The sister's heirs inherit nothing because a life tenant's interest is extinguished at death, and nothing reverts to the grantor because the grantor gave away the entire fee by naming a remainderman.5. A landlocked parcel enjoys a recorded easement over a neighbor's driveway to reach the public road. The owner of the landlocked parcel sells to a new buyer, and the neighbor then blocks the driveway, claiming the easement 'belonged to the old owner personally.' Who is right?
- A. The neighbor, because easements terminate automatically when the benefited property is sold
- B. The neighbor, unless the new buyer separately negotiates and records a fresh easement
- C. The buyer, because an easement appurtenant runs with the land and transfers automatically with the benefited parcel
- D. The buyer, but only if the seller expressly mentioned the easement in the deed of conveyance
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
An easement that benefits a particular parcel of land is an easement appurtenant: the benefited parcel is the dominant tenement and the burdened driveway parcel is the servient tenement. Appurtenant easements run with the land, passing automatically to successive owners of the dominant estate even if the deed never mentions them. Only an easement in gross, which benefits a person or company rather than a parcel, is tied to the holder personally, and that is not what a recorded access easement over a driveway is.6. For well over the statutory period, a rancher has driven cattle across a corner of a neighbor's land, openly, without permission, and on a regular seasonal schedule. The neighbor finally erects a gate, and the rancher sues, claiming a permanent right to cross. What doctrine supports the rancher's claim?
- A. Easement by prescription, based on open, hostile, and continuous use for the statutory period
- B. Easement by necessity, based on the rancher's business need for the shortest route
- C. License by estoppel, because the neighbor tolerated the crossings for years
- D. Adverse possession, which transfers full ownership of the strip to the rancher
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
A prescriptive easement arises when someone uses another's land openly, without the owner's permission, and continuously for the statutory period; the use here checks every element, so the rancher earns a permanent right to continue that specific use. Necessity requires a landlocked parcel severed from common ownership, which these facts do not show. Adverse possession is the tempting near-miss, but it conveys title to the land itself and typically demands exclusive possession, whereas the rancher only used a crossing and seeks only the right to keep using it.7. Before closing on a suburban lot, a buyer orders a boundary survey. The survey reveals that the neighbor's garage extends two feet across the property line onto the lot being purchased. What does the survey document, and why does it matter?
- A. An easement in gross, which the buyer must honor indefinitely
- B. A party wall, which makes both owners jointly responsible for the garage
- C. A deed restriction, which limits how the buyer may use that strip of land
- D. An encroachment, an unauthorized intrusion that can cloud title and may ripen into a prescriptive right if ignored
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
A structure that physically extends over a boundary onto land its owner does not hold is an encroachment. Encroachments matter because they can affect marketability, provoke boundary disputes, and, if left unchallenged for the statutory period, may mature into a prescriptive easement or support an adverse claim to the strip. An easement is an authorized right of use, a party wall is a shared structure built by agreement on a boundary, and a deed restriction is a private limitation written into the chain of title; none of those describes an unpermitted physical intrusion discovered by survey.8. A homeowner tells a friend, 'You can park your boat in my side yard until I say otherwise.' Two years later the homeowner sells the house, and the new owner orders the boat removed. The friend objects that he has 'a property right' in the parking spot. What right did the friend actually have?
- A. An easement appurtenant that transferred to the new owner subject to the boat
- B. A license — a revocable personal privilege that ended and does not bind the new owner
- C. A prescriptive easement, because the use lasted more than one year
- D. A leasehold estate that the new owner must honor until properly terminated
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Oral permission to use another's land is a license: a personal privilege, revocable at the will of the landowner, that creates no interest in the land and dies with a sale of the property or revocation by the owner. Because the use was permissive, it can never be hostile, so no prescriptive right could accrue no matter how long the boat sat there. There was no writing, no defined term, and no rent, so no leasehold arose, and nothing attached to a benefited parcel, so no easement appurtenant exists.9. A farm borders a small non-navigable river that the owner uses to irrigate crops. A dispute arises with an upstream landowner over water use. Which category of water rights governs this owner's claim in a state that follows the common-law doctrine?
- A. Littoral rights, which apply to land touching flowing streams
- B. Riparian rights, which entitle owners along a watercourse to reasonable use of the flowing water
- C. Appropriative rights, which belong to whoever recorded a water claim first at the courthouse
- D. Surface rights, which give the owner absolute control of all water crossing the land
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Land bordering a river or stream carries riparian rights under the common-law doctrine, allowing each owner along the watercourse to make reasonable use of the water in a way that respects the equal rights of the other riparian owners. Littoral rights are the parallel concept for land abutting large, relatively still bodies such as lakes, seas, and oceans, which makes that answer the tempting reversal. Prior appropriation is a separate permit-based system used mainly in arid western states, and no doctrine gives a private owner absolute control of a flowing stream.10. A restaurant tenant installed pizza ovens, a walk-in cooler, and booth seating in leased space, all bolted to the floor. The lease is ending and the landlord claims everything bolted down 'stays with the building.' What is the general rule for these items?
- A. They are trade fixtures the tenant may remove before the lease expires, repairing any damage caused by removal
- B. They became real property upon attachment and belong to the landlord permanently
- C. They belong to whichever party the next tenant agrees to pay for them
- D. They must be abandoned unless the landlord consented in writing at installation
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Articles a commercial tenant attaches to further the tenant's trade or business are trade fixtures, and the law treats them as the tenant's personal property despite physical annexation. The tenant may remove them before the lease term ends, provided the premises are restored from any damage the removal causes. The trap is the ordinary fixture rule, under which attached items become part of the realty; that rule yields to the trade-fixture exception precisely because requiring tenants to forfeit business equipment would discourage commercial improvements. Items left behind after expiration, however, typically become the landlord's property.11. A seller removed an antique dining-room chandelier before closing, leaving bare wires. The furious buyer insists the chandelier was part of the house. When a court sorts out whether an attached item is a fixture, which consideration generally carries the most weight?
- A. The item's dollar value relative to the price of the home
- B. Whether the item was mentioned in the listing photographs
- C. The intention of the party who attached the item, as judged objectively from the circumstances
- D. How long the item has been physically present in the home
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Courts weigh several fixture tests — method of annexation, adaptation to the realty, and intention — but the controlling consideration is the objective intention of the annexor, inferred from how the item was attached and how it functions with the property. A hard-wired chandelier objectively appears intended as a permanent improvement, which is why sellers who want to keep one should exclude it in the contract. Value, age, and marketing photos may color the dispute but are not the legal test, and relying on them is how parties end up litigating over light fittings.12. A title search turns up an old, doubtful interest clouding a property's title. The person holding that possible interest is willing to sign it away but refuses to make any promises about the condition of the title. Which deed fits this situation?
- A. General warranty deed
- B. Special warranty deed
- C. Quitclaim deed
- D. Deed of trust
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
A quitclaim deed conveys only whatever interest the grantor may have, carries no warranties, and is commonly used to clear clouds on title — exactly what a party releasing a doubtful interest without making promises would sign. The special warranty deed is the tempting wrong answer, but it still warrants against defects that arose during the grantor's period of ownership. A general warranty deed goes further, warranting against all defects arising at any time, and a deed of trust is a financing instrument that pledges property as security for a note, not a tool for releasing a doubtful interest.13. A purchase contract obligates the seller to convey marketable title. The buyer's title search reveals a serious, unresolved defect. The seller insists the buyer must close anyway, arguing that the general warranty deed offered at closing 'guarantees everything, so the title is as good as clean.' Is the seller's argument sound?
- A. Yes — a general warranty deed warrants against all defects arising at any time, so the title automatically qualifies as marketable
- B. No — marketable title must be free from reasonable doubt or serious defects that a prudent buyer would accept, and deed covenants do not remove a known serious defect from the title itself
- C. Yes — as long as the buyer also purchases title insurance, any defect becomes acceptable
- D. No — only a quitclaim deed is capable of conveying marketable title
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Marketable title is title free from reasonable doubt or serious defects that a prudent buyer would accept. A general warranty deed does offer the greatest protection — the grantor warrants against all defects arising at any time — but those covenants are promises of recourse against the grantor; they do not erase a serious known defect from the title, so the title remains unmarketable. Choice C fails because title insurance protects against losses from covered defects that existed but were unknown when the policy issued — a defect already revealed by the search is not an unknown one. Choice D is backwards: a quitclaim deed conveys whatever interest the grantor has with no warranties at all.14. A rural deed describes the parcel by starting at an iron pin at the intersection of two roads, then reciting a series of compass bearings and distances around the property's perimeter. For this metes-and-bounds description to be legally sufficient, what must the description do?
- A. Reference at least one government survey township and range line
- B. State the total acreage to at least two decimal places
- C. Be signed by a licensed surveyor before the deed is recorded
- D. Close the parcel by returning to the point of beginning
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
A metes-and-bounds description traces the boundary from a defined point of beginning through successive courses and distances, and it is legally adequate only if the traverse closes — that is, ends back at the point of beginning, fully enclosing the parcel. A description that fails to close leaves the boundary open and the parcel undefined. Township and range references belong to the rectangular government survey system, a different method entirely; acreage recitals are helpful but not essential; and a surveyor's signature is not what validates the legal description in a deed.15. Under the rectangular government survey system, an investor purchases the northeast quarter of a standard section of land. Approximately how many acres is the investor buying?
- A. 40 acres
- B. 160 acres
- C. 320 acres
- D. 640 acres
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
A standard section in the rectangular survey system is one square mile containing 640 acres. A quarter of a section is therefore 640 divided by 4, which is 160 acres. The other figures correspond to different subdivisions: a quarter of a quarter section is 40 acres, half a section is 320 acres, and the full section itself is 640 acres. Exam questions frequently chain these divisions together, so remembering that each successive quartering divides the acreage by four keeps the arithmetic straightforward.16. A homeowner wants to build a detached garage, but the lot's unusual pie shape means any garage would sit closer to the side lot line than the zoning ordinance's setback allows. The homeowner is not asking to change the property's use, only to deviate from the dimensional standard. What should the homeowner request?
- A. A variance from the zoning board based on the hardship created by the lot's shape
- B. A rezoning of the parcel to a less restrictive classification
- C. A conditional use permit for accessory structures
- D. A certificate of nonconforming use from the building department
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
A variance is precisely the remedy for a property owner who, because of a hardship unique to the parcel such as an odd shape or topography, cannot comply with a dimensional requirement like a setback. It permits a deviation from the ordinance without changing the underlying zoning. Rezoning changes the classification of the land itself, which is far more than this owner needs. A conditional or special use permit authorizes a listed use that requires case-by-case approval, and nonconforming-use status protects uses that lawfully existed before the ordinance — neither applies to a new garage that simply cannot meet a setback.17. A small corner grocery has operated at the same location for forty years. The city then rezones the entire neighborhood exclusively residential. May the grocery keep operating?
- A. No; it must close or relocate within a reasonable grace period set by the city
- B. Yes, but only if the owner obtains a variance renewing annually
- C. Yes; it may continue as a legal nonconforming use, though expansion or rebuilding after abandonment is typically restricted
- D. Only if a majority of the surrounding homeowners consent in writing
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
A use that was lawful when established and predates a zoning change is a legal nonconforming use, often called a grandfathered use, and it may generally continue despite the new ordinance. The protection is not unlimited: most ordinances bar enlarging the use, and the right is commonly lost if the use is abandoned or the building is destroyed. A variance is unnecessary because the use is already lawful, and neither forced closure nor neighbor consent reflects how zoning transitions are handled; ordinances aim to phase out nonconformities gradually, not confiscate existing businesses.18. A reclusive property owner dies without a will, and an exhaustive search locates no heirs of any degree. What ultimately happens to the ownership of her real estate?
- A. It passes to the county where the property is located through eminent domain
- B. It is sold at auction and the proceeds are held in trust indefinitely
- C. Title remains vacant until someone occupies the land and perfects adverse possession
- D. It passes to the state by escheat, so that land is never left without an owner
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Escheat is the doctrine under which real property reverts to the state when an owner dies intestate with no discoverable heirs; its purpose is to ensure land always has an owner and never sits in legal limbo. Eminent domain is the government's power to take property for public use with just compensation, which involves a taking from a living owner, not succession at death. Property does not simply sit unowned awaiting an adverse possessor, and courts do not warehouse sale proceeds forever; the state takes title directly.19. A subdivision's recorded covenants require all homes to be at least 2,000 square feet, while the city's zoning for the area allows homes as small as 1,200 square feet. A lot owner wants to build a 1,400 square foot cottage. May the owner build it?
- A. No; when a private restriction is stricter than zoning, the more restrictive standard controls
- B. Yes; government zoning always overrides private covenants
- C. Yes, provided the city issues a building permit for the cottage
- D. Yes, because covenants only bind the original purchasers from the developer
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Zoning and restrictive covenants operate independently, and a landowner must satisfy both; whichever is more restrictive effectively controls what can be built. Here the private covenant sets a higher minimum size than zoning, so the covenant defeats the cottage even though the city would permit it. A building permit only certifies compliance with public regulations and gives no immunity from private restrictions, and properly recorded covenants run with the land, binding successive owners, not just the developer's original buyers. Neighbors could enforce the covenant by injunction.20. For twenty years, a man has gardened a strip of his neighbor's lot, but only because the neighbor long ago told him, 'Feel free to use that strip as long as you like.' The man now claims he has acquired ownership of the strip by adverse possession. What is the fatal flaw in his claim?
- A. His use was permissive, so it was never hostile — a required element of adverse possession
- B. Gardening is not a sufficiently valuable use to support adverse possession
- C. Adverse possession cannot apply to only part of a parcel
- D. He never fenced the strip, and enclosure is always mandatory
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Adverse possession requires possession that is open and notorious, exclusive, continuous for the statutory period, and hostile — meaning without the owner's permission. Permission is the claim's kryptonite: once the neighbor invited the use, the occupation could never be hostile, and no amount of time converts a permitted use into ownership unless the permission is clearly repudiated. The nature of the use, partial-parcel claims, and fencing are red herrings; claimants can adversely possess a strip of land, and enclosure is merely one way of showing open and exclusive possession, not a universal requirement.21. A buyer's title search on a house reveals a recorded notice stating that a lawsuit is pending that could affect ownership of the property. The seller downplays it as 'just paperwork from an old dispute.' What is this notice, and what is its practical effect on the buyer?
- A. A judgment lien; the buyer must pay the plaintiff's claim before closing
- B. A writ of attachment; the sheriff has already seized the property
- C. A lis pendens; anyone acquiring the property takes it subject to the outcome of the pending litigation
- D. A default notice; the lender has begun foreclosure and the sale cannot proceed
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
A lis pendens is a recorded notice that litigation affecting title to or possession of the property is underway. It is not itself a lien and decides nothing, but it gives the world constructive notice, so a purchaser who buys anyway is bound by whatever judgment the court eventually renders. That risk devastates marketability, which is why buyers and title insurers treat it seriously rather than as mere paperwork. A judgment lien arises only after a judgment is entered, attachment involves an actual seizure, and a foreclosure default notice is a different instrument tied to a specific loan.22. A roofing contractor completes a 30,000 dollar roof replacement, but the homeowner refuses to pay. To secure the debt, the contractor files the lien the law provides for unpaid providers of labor and materials. How is this lien best classified?
- A. A general lien that attaches to everything the homeowner owns, including bank accounts
- B. A voluntary lien, because the homeowner ordered the work
- C. An equitable lien that exists only if the homeowner admits the debt in writing
- D. A specific, involuntary lien that attaches only to the property that was improved
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
A mechanic's or materialman's lien secures payment for labor or materials that improved a particular property, so it is specific — it burdens only the improved parcel, not the owner's other assets. It is also involuntary and statutory: it arises by operation of law from the unpaid improvement, not from the owner's agreement to grant a lien. A general lien, such as a judgment lien, can reach all of a debtor's property, and a voluntary lien, such as a mortgage, is one the owner consciously grants. Ordering the work is consent to a contract, not consent to a lien.23. A home is encumbered by a first mortgage recorded eight years ago, a home-equity line recorded three years ago, and this year's unpaid ad valorem property taxes. If the property is sold to satisfy the debts, which claim is generally paid first from the proceeds?
- A. The property tax lien, which takes priority over previously recorded private liens
- B. The first mortgage, because priority always follows the order of recording
- C. The home-equity line, because the most recent creditor relied on the newest information
- D. All three claims share the proceeds in proportion to the amounts owed
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Real property tax liens and special assessment liens enjoy superpriority: they are paid ahead of private liens regardless of when those liens were recorded, because tax collection is essential to government revenue. This is the recognized exception to the usual rule that priority follows the recording date, which makes the first-in-time mortgage the tempting answer. Among the private liens the recording order does govern, so the first mortgage would outrank the equity line, but both stand behind the taxing authority. Liens are satisfied in priority order, not pro rata.24. A purchaser buys a unit in a condominium community. Which statement accurately describes what the purchaser owns after closing?
- A. A proprietary lease in the unit plus shares in the corporation that owns the building
- B. Fee simple title to the individual unit plus an undivided interest in the common elements
- C. A fractional interest in the entire project, with the right to occupy any available unit
- D. Title to the airspace only, with the association owning all walls and land
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Condominium ownership combines two interests: fee simple title to the individual unit, which can be separately mortgaged, taxed, and conveyed, and an undivided co-ownership interest in the common elements such as the land, hallways, roof, and amenities. The proprietary-lease-plus-shares structure describes a cooperative, where a corporation owns the building and residents are shareholders with occupancy rights — the classic distractor because the two forms are constantly confused. Timeshare and pure-airspace descriptions likewise fail to capture the dual fee-plus-common-interest structure that defines a condominium.25. An owner lives in one unit of her four-unit building and rents out the other three herself, using no real estate licensee and running no advertising. When an applicant of a different race applies for a vacant unit, she refuses to rent to him because of his race, insisting she is shielded by the exemption for owner-occupied buildings of four or fewer units. Is her refusal lawful?
- A. No — the exemption applies only to single-family homes, never to multi-unit buildings.
- B. No — the exemption never applies to race, and the Civil Rights Act of 1866 separately prohibits all racial discrimination in property transactions with no exemptions.
- C. Yes — but only because she avoided using a licensee and ran no discriminatory advertising.
- D. Yes — the owner-occupied exemption for buildings of four or fewer units covers this refusal.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
The so-called Mrs. Murphy exemption for owner-occupied buildings of four or fewer units does not apply to race, and the Civil Rights Act of 1866 independently prohibits all racial discrimination in property transactions with no exemptions at all — so the refusal is unlawful on two separate grounds. Choice C is the tempting trap: avoiding discriminatory advertising and licensees is indeed a condition of using the exemption, but satisfying those conditions never extends the exemption to racial discrimination. Choice A misstates the exemption's scope — it does reach owner-occupied buildings of up to four units, just never for race.26. A property owner holds fee simple title to a residential lot. Aside from the surface itself, what does this ownership generally include, subject to reasonable government regulation?
- A. Only the surface of the land, with all air space and subsurface rights automatically belonging to the government.
- B. Air rights only, with no rights extending below the surface.
- C. Reasonable rights to the air space above and the earth below the surface, such as for aviation easements or subsurface utilities.
- D. Unlimited rights to the air space with no allowance for aircraft overflight regulation.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Fee simple ownership traditionally includes reasonable rights to the air above the land and the earth beneath it, not merely the surface itself, though those rights are subject to reasonable regulation such as public aviation easements permitting aircraft to fly at navigable altitudes; assuming the government automatically owns all air and subsurface rights misstates how the fee simple bundle of rights actually works.27. Marta sells her house to Ben and delivers a special warranty deed at closing. Months later, Ben discovers a valid claim against the title that arose years before Marta ever owned the property. Can Ben recover from Marta under the deed's warranties?
- A. Yes — her deed warrants against all title defects arising at any time, even before she owned the property
- B. Yes — every deed automatically includes a warranty that title is marketable
- C. No — a special warranty deed covers only defects that arose during Marta's period of ownership
- D. No — a special warranty deed, like a quitclaim deed, carries no warranties at all
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
A special warranty deed warrants only against title defects that arose during the grantor's period of ownership. Because this claim predates Marta's ownership, her warranties do not reach it. Choice A is the classic trap: it describes a general warranty deed, which does warrant against defects arising at any time — even before the grantor owned the property. Choice D confuses the special warranty deed with a quitclaim deed, which conveys whatever interest the grantor has with no warranties.28. A dishonest seller deeds the same lot twice: first to Ana, who puts her deed in a safe-deposit box, then to Blake, who knows nothing of Ana's purchase and promptly records his deed in the county land records. When the double sale surfaces, who generally holds priority, and why?
- A. Ana, because the deed that is delivered first always controls priority
- B. Blake, because recording gave constructive notice to the world and priority generally protects the first party to record
- C. Ana, because recording is optional and never affects the order of ownership interests
- D. Blake, but only because he can file a claim on a title insurance policy
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Recording a deed in the county land records provides constructive notice to the world of the grantee's interest and establishes priority, generally protecting the first party to record — here, Blake. The tempting answer is Ana, since her deed was delivered first, but by leaving it unrecorded she gave the world no notice of her interest and risks losing priority. Title insurance is a separate protection against losses from covered defects that were unknown when the policy issued; it does not determine priority between competing deeds.29. A seller signs an exclusive-right-to-sell listing with a broker. During the listing period, the seller's coworker — who never had any contact with the broker or its marketing — offers to buy the house directly from the seller, and the seller accepts. The seller now claims no commission is owed because the broker did not procure the buyer. Is a commission owed?
- A. No — under any exclusive listing, a seller who personally finds the buyer owes no commission.
- B. No — only a broker who actually procures the buyer is ever entitled to a commission.
- C. Yes — under an exclusive-right-to-sell listing, the broker earns the commission if the property sells during the listing period, regardless of who procures the buyer.
- D. Yes — but only if the broker can prove its marketing reached the coworker.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Under an exclusive-right-to-sell listing, the broker earns a commission if the property sells during the listing period no matter who procures the buyer — including the seller personally. Choice A describes an exclusive-agency listing, where the seller escapes the commission by personally finding the buyer; that is precisely the misconception this seller is relying on, but it is the wrong listing type. Choice B describes an open listing, the non-exclusive arrangement in which only the procuring broker is paid.30. A buyer's purchase contract includes a financing contingency. Despite a diligent, good-faith loan application, the buyer's financing is denied before the contingency deadline, and the buyer promptly notifies the seller. What is the buyer's position with respect to the contract and the earnest money?
- A. The buyer may cancel the contract and recover the earnest money deposit.
- B. The buyer forfeits the earnest money to the seller for failing to perform.
- C. The buyer must proceed to closing and locate alternative financing.
- D. The buyer may cancel only if the seller voluntarily agrees to a mutual release.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Contingencies such as financing, inspection, and appraisal give the buyer the right to cancel and recover the deposit if the condition is not met. Because the loan was denied, the financing contingency lets this buyer cancel and take back the earnest money — the good-faith deposit that has been sitting in the broker's trust account. Choice B reflects the common misconception that any failure to close costs the buyer the deposit; an unmet contingency is exactly the situation in which the deposit comes back. Choice D is wrong because the contingency itself confers the cancellation right — the seller's consent is not required.31. Which written instrument actually conveys title to real property from one party to another?
- A. A deed
- B. A title insurance policy
- C. A listing agreement
- D. A promissory note secured by a mortgage
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
A deed is the written instrument that conveys title to real property from a grantor to a grantee. The title insurance policy is the tempting distractor because it concerns title, but it only protects the insured against losses from covered defects that existed but were unknown when the policy issued — it transfers nothing. A listing agreement is an employment contract authorizing a broker to market the property, and a promissory note with a mortgage evidences and secures a debt; none of these conveys title.32. Hoping to generate new listings, a licensee canvasses a neighborhood telling homeowners that families belonging to a particular protected class have begun moving into the area, and urges the owners to sell quickly 'before it's too late.' Which prohibited practice does this conduct describe?
- A. Blockbusting
- B. Lawful prospecting, because no one was refused housing
- C. Steering
- D. Redlining
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Blockbusting is inducing owners to sell by suggesting that people of a protected class are moving into the area — exactly what this canvassing does. Steering is the tempting wrong answer, but steering targets buyers: it means channeling buyers toward or away from neighborhoods based on a protected class, whereas here the licensee is pressuring owners to sell. Redlining is a lending practice — denying loans or insurance in certain areas based on protected characteristics. The conduct is prohibited even though no one was denied housing, because the inducement itself is the violation.
Valuation and Market Analysis
13 questions33. A home sells for 300,000 dollars under a listing that provides for a six percent commission on the sale price. What is the total commission generated by this sale?
- A. 1,800 dollars
- B. 9,000 dollars
- C. 18,000 dollars
- D. 30,000 dollars
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Commission equals the sale price multiplied by the commission rate: 300,000 dollars times six percent is 18,000 dollars. Choice B is the tempting error — it assumes the question asks for one broker's share after an even split, but the question asks for the total commission; the split between listing and selling brokers happens afterward, per their agreement. Choice A results from a misplaced decimal, and choice D would require a ten percent rate.34. An investor is evaluating a small commercial building that produces a net operating income of 45,000 dollars per year. The investor will only pay a price consistent with a nine percent capitalization rate, but the seller is asking 540,000 dollars. Using the income capitalization approach, what value does the investor's analysis support?
- A. 405,000 dollars
- B. 450,000 dollars
- C. 500,000 dollars
- D. 540,000 dollars
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Under the income capitalization approach, value equals net operating income divided by the capitalization rate: 45,000 dollars divided by 0.09 is 500,000 dollars — below the seller's asking price, so the income does not support the asking figure. Choice B is the tempting shortcut of dividing by a rounded ten percent rate, choice A comes from multiplying by nine instead of dividing by nine percent, and choice D simply accepts the asking price, which is not derived from the property's income.35. An appraiser using the sales comparison approach analyzes a comparable that sold for 350,000 dollars. The comparable has a finished basement the subject property lacks, and the market pays about 15,000 dollars for that feature. How should the appraiser handle the adjustment?
- A. Average the subject and comparable values to split the difference
- B. Subtract 15,000 dollars from the comparable's sale price, adjusting it to 335,000 dollars
- C. Ignore the difference because basements are personal preference items
- D. Add 15,000 dollars to the subject's estimated value to reflect what it could be worth
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
In the sales comparison approach, adjustments are always made to the comparable, never to the subject, so the comparable is reshaped into a mirror image of the subject. When the comparable is superior — here, it has a finished basement the subject lacks — the appraiser subtracts the feature's market value from the comparable's price. The memory aid is that a superior comparable is adjusted downward and an inferior one upward. Adding value to the subject inverts the method, and averaging or ignoring genuine market-recognized differences produces an unsupported value conclusion.36. An appraiser must value a newly built public library, a property type that essentially never sells and produces no rental income. Which appraisal approach will the appraiser rely on most heavily?
- A. The cost approach, summing land value and depreciated replacement cost of the improvements
- B. The gross rent multiplier technique, using civic buildings as comparables
- C. The sales comparison approach, using libraries from other regions
- D. The income capitalization approach, using imputed rents
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
The cost approach values property by adding the land value to the current cost of reproducing or replacing the improvements, less accrued depreciation. It is the approach of choice for special-purpose properties like libraries, schools, and churches, and for new construction, because comparable sales are scarce or nonexistent and the property generates no income stream to capitalize. The sales comparison approach fails without a functioning market of similar sales, and both income-based techniques collapse when there is no rent — imputing rent to a free public library would be pure invention.37. A large older home offers five bedrooms but only one bathroom, and buyers consistently discount it for the awkward layout. In appraisal terms, what kind of value loss does this floor plan represent?
- A. Functional obsolescence, a loss in value from an outdated or poor design within the property
- B. External obsolescence, a loss in value caused by factors outside the property
- C. Physical deterioration, the ordinary wear and tear of the structure
- D. Economic depreciation, the accounting write-down of the building over time
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Depreciation in appraisal comes in three forms, and a five-bedroom, one-bath layout is textbook functional obsolescence: the deficiency arises from the property's own design failing to meet current market expectations. It may be curable if adding a bathroom costs less than the value it returns. External obsolescence is the tempting neighbor answer, but it requires a cause outside the property lines, such as a noisy highway. Physical deterioration is wear of the components themselves, not layout, and accounting depreciation is a tax and bookkeeping concept unrelated to appraisal loss in value.38. A well-maintained house sits directly under a newly expanded flight path, and roaring jet noise has measurably cut its market value. Why do appraisers classify this loss as incurable depreciation?
- A. Because noise damage compounds over time like physical wear
- B. Because the cause lies outside the property, and no expenditure on the property itself can eliminate it
- C. Because the owner failed to object when the flight path was approved
- D. Because soundproofing is prohibited by most building codes
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
This is external obsolescence: a loss in value inflicted by conditions beyond the property's boundaries, such as flight paths, highway noise, or a declining surrounding area. It is considered incurable by definition because the owner cannot fix the airport by spending money on the house; no on-site improvement removes the offending cause. Physical deterioration and functional obsolescence, by contrast, can each be curable when the cost to correct is justified by the value returned. The owner's silence during public hearings and building-code speculation have no bearing on how appraisers classify the loss.39. An appraiser is determining the highest and best use of a vacant downtown lot. A proposed luxury tower would earn the most money but violates the height limit, and a permitted parking lot would earn the least. Which statement reflects the correct analysis?
- A. The tower is the highest and best use because it is the most profitable option
- B. The parking lot is the highest and best use because it can begin operating immediately
- C. The lot has no highest and best use until the zoning changes
- D. The highest and best use is the most profitable use among those that are legally permissible, physically possible, and financially feasible
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Highest and best use is the reasonably probable use that passes four sequential tests: it must be legally permissible, physically possible, and financially feasible, and among the surviving candidates it must be maximally productive. The luxury tower fails at the first gate because it violates zoning, so its superior profits are irrelevant — profitability only breaks ties among lawful, feasible uses. The parking lot might or might not win; speed of implementation is not the test. Every parcel has some highest and best use at any given time, so the analysis never simply waits for rezoning.40. A buyer is weighing two nearly identical townhomes on the same street: one is priced at 289,000 dollars and the other at 315,000 dollars. The buyer refuses to consider the higher-priced unit at all. Which principle of value explains the buyer's behavior?
- A. Substitution — a buyer will not pay more for a property than the cost of acquiring an equally desirable alternative
- B. Anticipation — value reflects the expected future benefits of ownership
- C. Contribution — a feature is worth only what it adds to overall value
- D. Plottage — combining parcels can produce a value greater than the sum of the parts
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
The principle of substitution holds that a rational buyer will pay no more for a property than the cost of an equally desirable substitute available in the market. Two interchangeable townhomes on the same street are near-perfect substitutes, so the cheaper one caps what the other can command. Substitution is the economic bedrock beneath the sales comparison approach. Anticipation concerns expected future benefits, contribution measures the incremental value of a single feature, and plottage describes assemblage gains — each is a genuine valuation principle, but none explains preferring the identical cheaper unit.41. A couple builds a 6,000 square foot custom mansion in a neighborhood of modest 1,500 square foot starter homes. When they later sell, the price falls far short of what the same mansion would bring in an upscale area. Which valuation principle does their experience illustrate?
- A. Progression, because the small homes gain value from the mansion nearby
- B. Competition, because excess profits attract rival builders
- C. Regression, because the value of a superior property is pulled down by lesser surrounding properties
- D. Change, because neighborhoods constantly move through life cycles
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Regression describes how an over-improved property is dragged toward the level of its more modest neighbors: buyers shopping in a starter-home area will not pay mansion prices, so the superior home's value suffers. Its mirror image, progression, is the tempting reversal — that principle explains why the modest homes benefit from the mansion's presence, which is true for them but does not answer what happened to the mansion's own price. Competition and change are legitimate value principles about market rivalry and neighborhood life cycles, but neither addresses the mismatch between a property and its surroundings.42. An appraiser's three approaches to value produce indications of 402,000, 415,000, and 396,000 dollars for the same house. In arriving at a single final opinion of value, what does the appraiser do during reconciliation?
- A. Compute the arithmetic mean of the three indications
- B. Weigh each approach according to its reliability for this property type and the quality of its data, then select a supported value
- C. Discard the two outliers and adopt the middle figure automatically
- D. Report the highest figure, since it best protects the seller's equity
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Reconciliation is a judgment process, not a math exercise. The appraiser evaluates which approach is most relevant to the property type and which produced the most reliable data — for a house, typically the sales comparison approach — and then weights the indications accordingly to reach a defensible final opinion. Simple averaging is the classic wrong answer because it gives equal credibility to approaches of unequal reliability. Mechanically taking the middle figure repeats the same error, and choosing the highest number to please a party is a violation of appraisal ethics and independence.43. A homeowner preparing to list asks a salesperson for help setting an asking price. The salesperson analyzes recent nearby sales, current competing listings, and expired listings, then presents a suggested price range. What has the salesperson prepared, and what is its key limitation?
- A. An appraisal, which the salesperson may perform for any property the brokerage lists
- B. A broker's certification of value, which lenders may use to approve the buyer's loan
- C. A comparative market analysis, which guides pricing but is not an appraisal and cannot be represented as one
- D. An automated valuation, which is legally equivalent to a certified appraisal
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
A comparative market analysis is a pricing tool licensees routinely prepare from sold, active, and expired listings to help a seller choose a realistic asking price. Its limitation is definitional: it is not an appraisal, and a licensee who is not a licensed or certified appraiser must not hold it out as one. Formal appraisals for federally related lending must come from appropriately credentialed appraisers, so lenders do not underwrite loans on a CMA. Calling it a certification of value or equating an automated estimate with a certified appraisal misstates both the tool and the law.44. An investor wants a quick way to compare several small rental houses that recently sold in the same neighborhood. Which calculation produces the gross rent multiplier used for this kind of comparison?
- A. Sale price divided by the monthly gross rent
- B. Sale price multiplied by the annual gross rent
- C. Net operating income divided by the capitalization rate
- D. Monthly gross rent divided by the sale price
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
The gross rent multiplier is found by dividing the sale price by the monthly gross rent, giving investors a quick tool for comparing rental properties. Choice C is tempting because it is also a valuation formula, but it is the income capitalization approach (which estimates value from net operating income), not the gross rent multiplier. Choice D inverts the formula, and choice B multiplies instead of divides.45. A sale closes on April 15. The annual property tax bill of 3,600 dollars is paid in arrears at the end of the year, and the contract makes the seller responsible for taxes through the closing date. Using a 360-day banker's year with 30-day months, what entry appears on the closing statement?
- A. Credit the buyer 1,050 dollars
- B. Credit the seller 1,050 dollars
- C. Credit the buyer 2,550 dollars
- D. Credit the seller 2,550 dollars
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Because the tax is paid in arrears, the buyer will later pay the full bill, so the seller must credit the buyer for the seller's share at closing. Under the banker's year, the daily rate is 3,600 dollars divided by 360, or 10 dollars per day. The seller's period runs January 1 through April 15 — three 30-day months plus 15 days, or 105 days — so the seller's share is 105 times 10, a 1,050 dollar credit to the buyer. Choice B tempts by flipping the direction; crediting the seller is the treatment for expenses the seller prepaid, not those paid in arrears. The 2,550 dollar figures represent the buyer's 255-day share, which is not what changes hands.
Contracts and Agency
49 questions46. Which statement best describes the legal nature of a listing agreement?
- A. A written instrument that conveys title to the property from the seller to the broker
- B. A purchase contract that obligates a buyer to acquire the property
- C. A guarantee by the broker that the property will sell during the listing term
- D. An employment contract in which the seller authorizes a broker to market the property and find a ready, willing, and able buyer
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
A listing agreement is an employment contract between the seller and the broker: it hires the broker to market the property and produce a ready, willing, and able buyer. Choice A is the classic trap — the instrument that conveys title is a deed, not a listing; the listing transfers no ownership interest and (as choice C wrongly implies) guarantees no sale.47. A salesperson has been working with a buyer client when the buyer falls in love with a house the salesperson has listed for a seller client. For the salesperson to continue representing both sides of this transaction as a dual agent, what is required?
- A. The informed written consent of both the buyer and the seller
- B. An oral disclosure to both parties no later than closing
- C. The seller's consent only, since the seller is the party paying the commission
- D. Nothing — representing both parties is automatically permitted when both are clients of the same licensee
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Dual agency is legal only with the informed written consent of both parties, and even then the dual agent cannot advocate for one party against the other. Choice C reflects the common misconception that duties follow the commission — consent must come from both principals regardless of who pays, and oral or after-the-fact disclosure (choice B) is not enough.48. A property owner tells a friend, 'I hereby promise to give you my vacant lot next year,' with the friend giving nothing of value in return. The owner later changes her mind and refuses to convey the lot. Can the friend enforce this promise as a real estate contract?
- A. No, because a valid contract requires consideration, and a one-sided gratuitous promise lacks it.
- B. Yes, because any signed written promise concerning real estate is automatically binding.
- C. Yes, because real estate promises are enforceable regardless of consideration once made in good faith.
- D. No, because real property can never be transferred as a gift under any circumstances.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
A legally enforceable contract requires consideration, meaning something of value must be exchanged by both parties, and a one-sided promise to give property away without anything given in return is a gratuitous promise that generally cannot be enforced as a contract; assuming any signed statement about real estate automatically creates a binding contract ignores this essential element.49. A 16-year-old signs a contract to purchase a small parcel of land using money inherited from a relative. Under general contract law principles, what is the status of this contract?
- A. It is fully valid and enforceable exactly like a contract signed by an adult.
- B. It is voidable, meaning the minor may choose to disaffirm it due to lack of legal capacity.
- C. It is automatically void from the start and has no legal effect whatsoever.
- D. It becomes valid only once the minor turns 21.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
A contract signed by a minor is generally voidable rather than automatically void, meaning the minor lacks full legal capacity and has the option to disaffirm, or cancel, the contract, while the adult party generally remains bound unless the minor elects to void it; treating the contract as automatically void with no legal effect at all overstates the actual rule, which gives the choice to the minor rather than eliminating the contract outright.50. Two parties sign a written agreement in which a landowner agrees to lease a portion of land specifically for an operation that is illegal under both state and federal law. Is this agreement an enforceable real estate contract?
- A. Yes, as long as both parties freely and knowingly agreed to the terms.
- B. Yes, but only the landowner can choose to void it.
- C. No, because a contract formed for an illegal purpose is void and unenforceable regardless of mutual consent.
- D. No, but only until the illegal activity is later legalized, at which point it becomes enforceable retroactively.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
A valid contract requires a lawful objective, and an agreement made for an illegal purpose is void from the outset, meaning it has no legal effect and cannot be enforced by either party no matter how willingly both sides agreed to it; mutual consent cannot cure the fundamental defect created by an illegal purpose.51. A signed, written real estate purchase contract specifies a purchase price. During negotiations, the buyer and seller later reach an oral agreement over the phone to lower the price, but nothing is put in writing or signed. If a dispute later arises, which price will generally control?
- A. The oral lower price, since verbal agreements between the same parties automatically supersede earlier written terms.
- B. Whichever price benefits the buyer, since courts favor buyers in ambiguous situations.
- C. An average of the two prices, split evenly between the original and the oral change.
- D. The original written price, because the statute of frauds generally requires modifications to real estate contracts to be in writing to be enforceable.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
The statute of frauds requires real estate contracts, including material modifications like price changes, to be in writing and signed to be enforceable, so an unrecorded oral change to a material term like price generally cannot override the original signed written agreement; assuming a later phone conversation automatically supersedes the signed contract ignores this basic requirement protecting real estate transactions from unreliable verbal claims.52. A buyer submits a written purchase offer at 250,000 dollars. The seller responds with a written counteroffer at 260,000 dollars. The buyer then decides the original 250,000 dollar offer was fair after all and tries to accept it. Can the buyer still accept the original offer?
- A. No, because the seller's counteroffer legally terminated the buyer's original offer.
- B. Yes, because offers remain open and acceptable until a contract closes.
- C. Yes, as long as the buyer accepts within 24 hours of the counteroffer.
- D. No, but only because more than one business day has passed since the original offer.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
A counteroffer operates as a rejection of the original offer and simultaneously proposes new terms, which legally terminates the original offer entirely, so the buyer can no longer simply accept it after the seller has countered; the only options left to the buyer are to accept, reject, or counter the seller's new counteroffer, not revive the earlier terminated offer.53. A buyer offers 300,000 dollars. The seller counters at 320,000. The buyer then counters back at 310,000, and the seller signs that counteroffer without further changes. What price governs the resulting contract?
- A. 300,000 dollars, the buyer's original offer.
- B. 310,000 dollars, the buyer's final counteroffer that the seller accepted.
- C. 320,000 dollars, the seller's first counteroffer.
- D. 315,000 dollars, the midpoint between the last two counteroffers.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Each counteroffer in a negotiation replaces and terminates the prior offer, so only the terms of the most recent counteroffer that is actually signed and accepted without further changes become the binding contract; earlier numbers in the negotiation chain, including the buyer's original offer and the seller's first counteroffer, no longer have any legal effect once superseded by later counteroffers.54. A buyer under contract to purchase a commercial building assigns the contract to another investor, and the seller consents to the assignment. The new investor later fails to close. Absent a novation, is the original buyer still potentially liable to the seller?
- A. No, because assignment automatically and completely releases the assignor from all contractual obligations.
- B. No, because the seller's consent to the assignment always operates as a full release of the original buyer.
- C. Yes, because a simple assignment transfers contract rights and duties to the assignee but does not by itself release the original party from liability unless a novation occurs.
- D. Yes, but only if the assignment was made without the seller's knowledge.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Assignment allows a party to transfer contract rights and delegate performance duties to a third party, but unless the other original party specifically agrees to a novation, a substitution that releases the original party and substitutes the new one entirely, the original assignor generally remains secondarily liable if the assignee fails to perform; simple consent to an assignment is not automatically the same thing as a novation releasing that original liability.55. A seller, buyer, and a new substituting buyer all sign a written agreement in which the original buyer is completely released from the purchase contract and the new buyer takes over all rights and obligations in the original buyer's place. What is this type of agreement called?
- A. An assignment
- B. A contingency waiver
- C. An addendum
- D. A novation
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
A novation is a three-party agreement in which all parties consent to substitute a new party into a contract in place of an original party, and it fully releases the original party from further liability, unlike a simple assignment, which transfers rights and duties but generally leaves the original party still on the hook unless everyone specifically agrees otherwise.56. A real estate purchase contract includes a clause stating that if the buyer defaults, the seller may retain the earnest money as the seller's sole and exclusive remedy. The earnest money amount is a reasonable estimate of the seller's likely damages from a default. How are courts generally likely to treat this clause?
- A. As an enforceable liquidated damages clause, since it reflects a reasonable pre-estimate of damages rather than a punitive amount.
- B. As automatically unenforceable, since courts refuse to enforce any clause limiting a seller's remedies.
- C. As enforceable only if the buyer separately initials the clause in a different color ink.
- D. As unenforceable because liquidated damages clauses are illegal in real estate contracts nationwide.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Courts generally enforce liquidated damages clauses when the specified amount represents a reasonable, good-faith estimate of the actual damages likely to result from a breach, rather than an excessive amount designed purely to punish the defaulting party; treating all such clauses as automatically unenforceable ignores that they are a well-established and common contract remedy specifically because they are reasonable rather than punitive.57. A seller signs open listings with three different brokerages and also continues to advertise the property personally. Broker B ultimately produces the buyer who purchases the home. What commission is owed?
- A. Only Broker B earns a commission, because under an open listing only the procuring broker is paid.
- B. All three brokers split the commission equally, because each held a valid listing.
- C. No commission is owed, because signing listings with multiple brokers voids all of the agreements.
- D. The first broker to sign a listing earns the commission, regardless of who procured the buyer.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
An open listing is non-exclusive: the seller may list with multiple brokers at once, and only the broker who actually procures the buyer earns a commission. Choice B is tempting because all three brokers held listings, but merely holding an open listing earns nothing — procuring the buyer is what triggers payment. Multiple open listings are perfectly valid, so C is wrong.58. A buyer with no active contingencies simply changes his mind and refuses to close on a fully executed purchase contract, without any legal excuse. What remedy or remedies does the seller generally have available?
- A. None, because a buyer can always cancel a signed contract without consequence before closing.
- B. Depending on the contract terms, the seller may retain the earnest money as liquidated damages, sue for actual damages, or in some cases seek specific performance.
- C. The seller must automatically forfeit the property to the buyer at a reduced price.
- D. The seller's only possible remedy is to report the buyer to the state licensing board.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
When a buyer defaults on a real estate contract without a valid contingency or legal excuse, the seller typically has several possible remedies depending on the specific contract language, including retaining the earnest money as agreed liquidated damages, pursuing a lawsuit for actual monetary damages, or in some circumstances seeking specific performance to force the sale; claiming the buyer faces no consequence at all ignores the whole purpose of a binding, contingency-free purchase contract.59. A seller who signed a valid, contingency-free purchase contract simply refuses to close because a better offer came along afterward. The buyer wants to force the sale to go through rather than just receive money damages. What remedy is the buyer most likely to pursue?
- A. Rescission, which would cancel the contract entirely.
- B. Liquidated damages, since that is the buyer's only available option.
- C. Specific performance, since real estate is considered unique and money damages alone may not be an adequate remedy.
- D. Constructive eviction, since the seller is preventing the buyer from occupying the home.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Because each parcel of real property is considered legally unique, courts recognize that money damages may not adequately compensate a buyer for a seller's refusal to convey a specific property, so buyers commonly seek specific performance, a court order compelling the seller to actually complete the sale as agreed; rescission instead cancels the contract entirely, which is the opposite of what a buyer wanting to force the sale through would be pursuing.60. A house sells for 400,000 dollars under a listing that provides for a five percent commission on the sale price. Under the brokers' agreement, the total commission is split equally between the listing broker and the selling broker. How much does the selling broker receive?
- A. 5,000 dollars
- B. 10,000 dollars
- C. 20,000 dollars
- D. 40,000 dollars
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Commission equals sale price multiplied by the commission rate, and the total is then split between the listing and selling brokers per their agreement: 400,000 dollars × 5% = 20,000 dollars total, and an equal split leaves the selling broker 10,000 dollars. Choice C is the common slip — stopping at the total commission and forgetting to apply the split. Choice D reflects a misplaced decimal.61. A seller signs an exclusive-right-to-sell listing agreement with a broker. During the listing period, the seller finds a buyer entirely on her own, without any involvement from the broker or the broker's marketing efforts, and completes the sale. Is a commission owed to the broker?
- A. No, because the seller personally found the buyer without the broker's help.
- B. No, because commissions are only owed under an exclusive-agency listing, not an exclusive right to sell.
- C. Only half the commission is owed, since the seller did half the work.
- D. Yes, because under an exclusive-right-to-sell listing the broker earns the commission no matter who actually produces the buyer.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
An exclusive-right-to-sell listing entitles the broker to a commission if the property sells during the listing period regardless of who actually finds the buyer, including the seller personally, which distinguishes it from an exclusive-agency listing, where the seller retains the right to sell independently without owing a commission; assuming the seller's own effort eliminates the commission obligation misapplies the exclusive-agency rule to this different listing type.62. A seller signs an exclusive-agency listing agreement, which allows the seller to sell the property personally without owing a commission, while still committing to work with only one broker. If the seller personally finds and sells to a buyer with no broker involvement, is a commission owed?
- A. No, because under an exclusive-agency listing the seller retains the right to sell without triggering a commission.
- B. Yes, because all listing agreements entitle the broker to a commission on any sale during the term.
- C. Yes, but only a partial commission based on the broker's marketing costs.
- D. No, but only if the seller sold to a family member rather than a stranger.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
An exclusive-agency listing specifically preserves the seller's right to sell the property personally without paying the listed broker a commission, while still promising not to list with any other broker; this is the key feature distinguishing it from an exclusive-right-to-sell listing, which pays the broker a commission on any sale during the term no matter who finds the buyer, including the seller.63. A seller signs open listings with two different brokerages. Brokerage A shows the property to a buyer first but never follows up. Brokerage B later independently shows the same buyer the property, negotiates the offer, and closes the sale. Under an open listing, who is generally entitled to the commission?
- A. Brokerage A, since it showed the property to the buyer first.
- B. Brokerage B, because it was the procuring cause that actually brought about the completed sale.
- C. Both brokerages equally, split regardless of each one's actual role in the sale.
- D. Neither brokerage, since open listings never entitle any broker to a commission.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Under an open listing, commission is earned by whichever broker is the procuring cause of the sale, meaning the broker whose uninterrupted efforts actually brought about the completed transaction, rather than simply the first broker to ever show the property; here, since Brokerage A never followed up and Brokerage B independently drove the negotiation and closing, Brokerage B is the one whose efforts procured the sale.64. A seller agrees to a net listing, telling the broker: 'I just want 400,000 dollars out of this sale, keep whatever you sell it for above that as your fee.' What is an important consideration a licensee should keep in mind about this type of arrangement?
- A. Net listings are illegal in every U.S. jurisdiction and can never be used.
- B. Net listings guarantee the broker a fixed, predetermined commission percentage.
- C. Net listings can create a conflict of interest and heightened disclosure obligations because the broker's compensation depends on selling above the seller's minimum, so they must be handled with particular care and full transparency about pricing.
- D. Net listings automatically convert into exclusive-right-to-sell agreements once signed.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
In a net listing, the broker's compensation is whatever amount the sale price exceeds the seller's stated net amount, which creates an inherent incentive conflict since the broker benefits from a higher sale price in a way that could tempt withholding a fair market value opinion, so licensees must exercise particular care, full transparency, and strict adherence to their fiduciary duty of full disclosure when using this structure; treating them as universally illegal everywhere overstates the rule, since the real issue is the heightened care and disclosure they demand.65. A brokerage represents both the buyer and the seller in the same transaction, but the firm assigns one licensee to represent the seller exclusively and a different licensee to represent the buyer exclusively, with each advocating solely for their own client. What is this arrangement called?
- A. Subagency
- B. Undisclosed dual agency
- C. Transaction brokerage
- D. Designated agency
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Designated agency allows a brokerage to appoint two different licensees within the same firm to represent the buyer and seller separately in the same transaction, with each designated agent owing full fiduciary duties exclusively to their own assigned client rather than to both parties simultaneously; this differs from dual agency, where a single licensee represents both parties at once with necessarily divided loyalties.66. A buyer working directly with the listing agent at an open house has not signed any buyer representation agreement and has been told the agent represents only the seller. What is this buyer's status in the transaction?
- A. The buyer is an unrepresented customer, entitled to honesty and fair dealing but not the full fiduciary duties owed to the seller-client.
- B. The buyer automatically becomes the agent's client the moment they ask a substantive question about the property.
- C. The buyer is legally considered the seller's dual agent.
- D. The buyer has no rights whatsoever in the transaction until represented by a licensee.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
An unrepresented buyer working with the seller's agent is generally treated as a customer rather than a client, meaning the agent still owes basic duties of honesty, fair dealing, and disclosure of material facts, but not the full fiduciary duties of loyalty, confidentiality, and obedience that are owed exclusively to the seller as the client; assuming a substantive question automatically creates a client relationship misunderstands how agency relationships are actually formed.67. A seller instructs the listing agent to conceal a known, serious structural defect from any prospective buyers who ask about the property's condition. What should the agent do?
- A. Follow the instruction, because the duty of obedience requires agents to follow every client instruction without exception.
- B. Decline to follow that specific instruction, because the duty of obedience only extends to lawful instructions, and concealing a known material defect from an inquiring buyer is not lawful.
- C. Follow the instruction, but only after getting the seller to confirm it in writing.
- D. Terminate the agency relationship immediately without informing the seller why.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
The fiduciary duty of obedience requires an agent to follow the client's lawful instructions, but it never requires, or permits, the agent to follow instructions that would violate the law, such as knowingly concealing a serious defect from a buyer who directly asks about the property's condition; treating obedience as unlimited ignores this crucial lawful-instructions-only boundary built into the duty.68. A listing agent receives signed disclosure forms, inspection reports, and an earnest money check from a buyer during a transaction. Which fiduciary duty most directly requires the agent to properly track, safeguard, and account for these documents and funds?
- A. The duty of loyalty
- B. The duty of disclosure
- C. The duty of accounting
- D. The duty of obedience
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
The fiduciary duty of accounting requires an agent to properly track, safeguard, and provide a record of all documents, funds, and property entrusted to them during a transaction, ensuring nothing is lost, misapplied, or handled carelessly; the duty of loyalty instead concerns putting the client's interests above the agent's own, which is a related but distinct fiduciary obligation.69. A listing agent learns that a seller-client's home is significantly underpriced relative to its true market value. Without disclosing this to the seller, the agent quietly arranges for a close friend to purchase the home at the low asking price, intending to split the resale profit later. Which fiduciary duty does this most directly violate?
- A. The duty of obedience
- B. The duty of confidentiality
- C. The duty of reasonable care and skill
- D. The duty of loyalty, since the agent placed personal financial gain ahead of the seller's best interests.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
The fiduciary duty of loyalty requires an agent to place the client's interests above the agent's own personal or financial interests, and secretly steering an underpriced property to a friend for a personal profit-sharing arrangement is a textbook example of self-dealing that breaches this core duty; while such a scheme might also raise disclosure concerns, the essential violation here is the agent's disloyal pursuit of personal gain at the seller's expense.70. A broker has an active listing agreement on a home. Before the home sells, it is completely destroyed by a fire. What happens to the listing agreement?
- A. The agency relationship terminates by operation of law because the subject matter of the agreement no longer exists.
- B. The listing remains fully in effect, and the broker must now market the vacant lot at the same original price.
- C. The listing automatically transfers to cover the seller's next property purchase instead.
- D. The listing continues in effect until its stated expiration date regardless of the destruction.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
When the subject property of an agency agreement is destroyed, the agreement generally terminates by operation of law because its underlying purpose can no longer be fulfilled, since there is no longer a home to sell under the original terms; assuming the listing simply continues unchanged ignores that a listing agreement's entire object was the now-destroyed structure, not merely the underlying land.71. A listing agreement states a term of 'six months from the date of signing.' Neither party takes any action to renew or extend it, and no sale occurs. What happens to the agency relationship once six months pass?
- A. It automatically renews for another six months unless the seller cancels in writing.
- B. It terminates automatically at the end of the stated term without requiring either party to take further action.
- C. It remains in effect indefinitely until the broker formally releases the seller.
- D. It converts automatically into an open listing rather than terminating.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
A listing agreement with a defined term simply expires and the agency relationship ends automatically once that stated period runs out, with no requirement that either party take additional action to terminate it; assuming automatic renewal or automatic conversion into a different type of listing both invent terms that are not part of a standard, clearly time-limited listing agreement.72. A seller and broker are both dissatisfied with how a listing is progressing. They sit down, discuss it, and sign a written release canceling the listing agreement before its stated term expires. What method of termination does this represent?
- A. Termination by operation of law
- B. Termination by revocation only
- C. Termination by mutual agreement
- D. Termination by destruction of the subject property
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
When both parties to an agency agreement voluntarily agree to end the relationship before its natural expiration and formalize that agreement, typically in writing, this is termination by mutual agreement; termination by operation of law instead refers to situations outside either party's control, such as death, incapacity, or destruction of the property, none of which describe this voluntary, negotiated cancellation.73. A licensee, without any actual authority from the seller, tells a buyer that the seller will definitely accept a certain price and include specific furniture in the sale. The seller never approved these representations. If the buyer reasonably relied on them, what legal concept could expose the seller or broker to liability?
- A. Actual express authority, since the seller technically approved this in the listing agreement.
- B. Universal agency, which grants unlimited authority to make any representation.
- C. Ratification, which automatically applies whenever a licensee speaks on a client's behalf.
- D. Apparent authority, where a third party's reasonable reliance on a licensee's representations can create liability even without actual authorization.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Apparent authority arises when a principal's conduct leads a third party to reasonably believe an agent has authority to act or speak on the principal's behalf, and if that belief is reasonable, the principal may be bound or exposed to liability even though the agent never actually had that specific authority; this is distinct from actual authority, which requires the principal to have genuinely granted the power being exercised.74. A real estate agent, believing certain buyers would be 'more comfortable' there, consistently shows Hispanic buyers only listings in one particular part of town while showing white buyers a much broader range of neighborhoods, regardless of what each buyer actually requests. What discriminatory practice does this describe?
- A. Steering
- B. Redlining
- C. Blockbusting
- D. Restrictive covenanting
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Steering occurs when an agent channels homebuyers toward or away from particular neighborhoods based on a protected characteristic such as race or national origin, rather than the buyer's own stated preferences and needs, and it is prohibited under fair housing law; redlining instead refers to lenders or insurers denying services to entire geographic areas based on the racial composition of the area, which is a related but distinct practice typically committed by financial institutions rather than agents showing property.75. A mortgage lender systematically denies loan applications for properties located in a particular zip code that has a high concentration of minority residents, regardless of individual applicants' creditworthiness. What discriminatory practice does this describe?
- A. Steering
- B. Redlining
- C. Blockbusting
- D. Disparate treatment in advertising only
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Redlining refers to a lender or insurer denying or limiting services, such as mortgage loans, to an entire geographic area based on the racial or ethnic composition of its residents rather than individual applicants' actual qualifications, and it is illegal under fair lending and fair housing laws; steering, by contrast, involves an agent directing individual buyers toward or away from certain neighborhoods, which is a distinct practice typically committed at the point of a specific buyer's home search rather than at the institutional lending level.76. A property listing advertisement states: 'Perfect for a young Christian family, walking distance to church.' Under fair housing law, what is the problem with this advertisement?
- A. There is no problem, since the ad simply describes nearby amenities.
- B. The problem is only that the ad fails to mention the property's square footage.
- C. The ad expresses a discriminatory preference based on religion and familial status, which fair housing law prohibits in advertising.
- D. The ad is problematic only because it fails to include an equal housing opportunity logo.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Fair housing law prohibits advertising that indicates a preference, limitation, or discrimination based on protected characteristics, and describing a property as ideal for a 'young Christian family' explicitly signals a preference tied to both religion and familial status, both of which are protected classes; the missing equal housing logo, while good practice, is not the core legal problem with this particular advertisement's discriminatory language.77. A tenant with a documented disability asks a landlord for permission to keep an assistance animal in a building that otherwise enforces a strict no-pets policy. Under fair housing law, how should this request generally be handled?
- A. The landlord may deny the request outright, since a documented no-pets policy applies uniformly to all tenants.
- B. The landlord may charge an additional pet deposit before approving the assistance animal.
- C. The request may be denied unless the tenant pays for and passes an obedience certification for the animal.
- D. The request should generally be granted as a reasonable accommodation, since assistance animals are not treated as pets under fair housing law.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Under fair housing law, a tenant with a disability is generally entitled to a reasonable accommodation allowing an assistance animal even in a building with a no-pets policy, because assistance animals are treated as a disability accommodation rather than an ordinary pet, and landlords typically cannot charge the usual pet fees or deposits for them; enforcing the uniform no-pets policy against a legitimate accommodation request misapplies fair housing protections for tenants with disabilities.78. A buyer's purchase offer is contingent on the buyer first selling their current home. The seller accepts but adds a kick-out clause allowing the seller to continue marketing the property and accept a better offer if the buyer cannot remove the sale contingency within a set notice period. What is the purpose of this kick-out clause from the seller's perspective?
- A. It protects the seller from being indefinitely tied to a contract that depends on an uncertain future sale of the buyer's own home.
- B. It guarantees the buyer will always close regardless of whether their home sells.
- C. It eliminates the need for the buyer to sell their current home at all.
- D. It automatically extends the closing date until the buyer's home sells, with no seller flexibility.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
A kick-out clause gives the seller a way to keep marketing the property and accept a stronger offer if the original buyer cannot remove a home-sale contingency within an agreed notice period, protecting the seller from being stuck waiting indefinitely on an uncertain outcome outside their control; assuming it guarantees the buyer will always close misunderstands its purpose, which exists precisely because that outcome is not guaranteed.79. A prospective buyer pays a landowner a nonrefundable fee for the exclusive right, but not the obligation, to purchase a parcel at a fixed price any time within the next six months. What kind of arrangement is this?
- A. A bilateral purchase contract
- B. An option contract
- C. An exclusive-right-to-sell listing
- D. A right of first refusal
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
An option contract gives the option holder the exclusive right, but not the obligation, to purchase a property at agreed terms within a specified period in exchange for consideration paid to the property owner, making it a unilateral arrangement where only the property owner is bound to sell if the option is exercised; a right of first refusal is different, since it only gives the holder the right to match a third-party offer rather than an independent right to buy at a preset price at any time.80. A tenant signs a residential lease that also includes a clause granting the tenant the right, but not the obligation, to purchase the home at a predetermined price before the lease ends. What best describes this combined arrangement?
- A. A standard month-to-month tenancy with no purchase rights.
- B. A right of first refusal requiring the tenant to match any competing offer.
- C. A lease-option agreement, combining a rental agreement with an option to purchase the property.
- D. A land contract requiring the tenant to complete the purchase regardless of intent.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
A lease-option agreement combines an ordinary rental arrangement with a separate option giving the tenant the right, but not the obligation, to purchase the property under predetermined terms before the lease term ends, allowing the tenant to decide later whether to exercise that purchase right; a land contract is a different arrangement entirely, one that obligates the buyer to complete the purchase over time rather than merely granting an optional right to do so.81. A purchase contract states that time is of the essence and sets a firm closing date. The buyer's funds are not ready until two days after that date, and the buyer argues that short delays are customary in real estate closings. What is the legal effect of missing the stated date?
- A. The closing date extends automatically for a reasonable period, since brief delays are customary
- B. There is no consequence, because closing dates are targets rather than binding terms
- C. The seller must first grant one written extension before any breach can be declared
- D. The buyer is in breach, because the clause makes the stated deadline strictly enforceable
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
A time-is-of-the-essence clause makes stated deadlines strictly enforceable, so failing to perform by the date is a breach. Choice A is the tempting answer because informal grace periods are common in practice — but that customary flexibility is precisely what the clause eliminates; nothing requires the seller to grant an extension first.82. Over coffee, a homeowner orally agrees to sell a rental house to a friend at an agreed price, and they shake hands on the deal. A week later the owner receives a better offer and refuses to perform. Can the friend enforce the handshake agreement?
- A. Yes, because mutual assent and consideration were both present.
- B. Yes, provided two witnesses can confirm the handshake took place.
- C. No, because the Statute of Frauds requires a real estate contract to be in a signed writing.
- D. No, because real property may only be sold through a licensed broker.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
A valid real estate contract requires competent parties, mutual assent, consideration, a lawful object, AND compliance with the Statute of Frauds, which mandates a written, signed agreement. Choice A is tempting because assent and consideration genuinely existed, but for real estate the writing is an additional required element, and the oral handshake fails it. No rule requires a broker's involvement, so D is wrong.83. A listing agent tells a buyer that a home's roof was replaced 'just two years ago,' relying entirely on what the seller told the agent without independently verifying the claim. The roof turns out to be over fifteen years old and already leaking. What has the agent most likely committed?
- A. Fraud, since any inaccurate statement automatically qualifies as fraud regardless of the agent's knowledge.
- B. No violation at all, since the agent was simply repeating what the seller said.
- C. Breach of the duty of confidentiality toward the seller.
- D. Negligent misrepresentation, since the agent passed along an unverified factual claim to a buyer without a reasonable basis for believing it was accurate.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Negligent misrepresentation occurs when an agent makes a factual statement to a buyer without a reasonable basis for believing it is true, even without intending to deceive, and licensees have a duty to exercise reasonable care rather than blindly repeating unverified seller claims as fact; treating this as no violation at all ignores that agents can be held responsible for passing along inaccurate information they failed to reasonably verify, even absent an intent to defraud.84. A buyer and seller negotiate the sale of a duplex. Which of the following is NOT required for their agreement to be a valid, enforceable real estate contract?
- A. Parties who are legally competent to contract
- B. An earnest money deposit
- C. Mutual assent shown by offer and acceptance
- D. A written and signed agreement satisfying the Statute of Frauds
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
A valid real estate contract requires competent parties, mutual assent, consideration, a lawful object, and — under the Statute of Frauds — a written and signed agreement. Earnest money is tempting because it appears in nearly every deal, but it is only a good-faith deposit held in the broker's trust account; a contract can be fully valid without any deposit at all.85. A salesperson represents the seller of a home. At an open house, an unrepresented visitor becomes seriously interested in buying it. Under agency law, what duties does the salesperson owe this visitor?
- A. The full fiduciary duties summarized by OLD CAR
- B. None, because the visitor is not the salesperson's client
- C. Honesty, fair dealing, and disclosure of known material defects
- D. Confidentiality protecting anything the visitor reveals about their finances
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
The visitor is a customer, not a client, so the salesperson owes honesty, fair dealing, and disclosure of known material defects — but not fiduciary duties, which run only to the principal (the seller). Choice B is the tempting overcorrection: 'not my client' does not mean 'no duties at all'; customers are still owed the baseline duties.86. A new licensee memorizes the acronym OLD CAR to recall the fiduciary duties owed to a principal. Which of the following is NOT one of the duties represented in that acronym?
- A. Obedience
- B. Reasonable care
- C. Honesty
- D. Accounting
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
OLD CAR stands for Obedience, Loyalty, Disclosure, Confidentiality, Accounting, and Reasonable care and diligence — the core fiduciary duties owed to a client. Honesty is tempting because licensees do owe it, but it belongs to the baseline duties owed to customers (honesty, fair dealing, and disclosure of known material defects), not to the fiduciary acronym itself.87. A salesperson receives a buyer's earnest money check late on a Friday and, 'to keep it safe over the weekend,' deposits it into the salesperson's personal checking account, intending to move it to the brokerage's trust account on Monday. Which fiduciary duty has the salesperson violated?
- A. Obedience
- B. Accounting
- C. Disclosure
- D. Loyalty
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Accounting requires the agent to safeguard and account for all money entrusted to the agent and specifically prohibits commingling client funds with the agent's own funds — which is exactly what depositing the check into a personal account does, however briefly. Earnest money belongs in the broker's trust account. Loyalty is the tempting alternative, but loyalty governs conflicts of interest and self-dealing; the duty that governs handling entrusted funds is accounting.88. A seller privately tells the listing agent about a significant foundation crack that was professionally repaired years ago, then instructs the agent never to mention it to buyers because 'it's already fixed and none of their business.' A prospective buyer directly asks the agent whether the home has ever had any foundation issues. What should the agent do?
- A. Disclose the known foundation issue when directly asked, since concealing a known material fact from an inquiring buyer would violate the agent's duty of honesty even while representing the seller.
- B. Follow the seller's instruction and simply tell the buyer there are no known issues.
- C. Refuse to answer the question at all, redirecting the buyer to ask the seller directly with no further comment.
- D. Disclose the issue only if the buyer specifically requests it in writing and pays for the disclosure.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
While an agent owes confidentiality and loyalty to the seller-client, that duty does not extend to actively lying about or denying a known material fact when a buyer directly asks a specific question, since agents also owe a baseline duty of honesty and fair dealing to third parties in the transaction; following the seller's instruction to falsely deny the issue would cross the line from lawful confidentiality into affirmative misrepresentation, which is not something the duty of obedience can excuse.89. A buyer submits a written offer on a house. The seller signs it but first crosses out the closing date and writes in a later one, then returns it. The buyer, uneasy about the change, walks away. The seller then announces she will now accept the buyer's original offer exactly as written. Is there a binding contract?
- A. Yes — the seller's later acceptance of the original, unaltered terms formed a contract
- B. No — the seller's alteration was a counteroffer that rejected and terminated the original offer, leaving nothing for her to accept later
- C. Yes — a minor change such as a closing date does not prevent the seller's signature from operating as an acceptance
- D. No — but only because the buyer never deposited earnest money to make the offer binding
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Any change to the terms of an offer — even one term, like the closing date — is a counteroffer, and a counteroffer rejects and terminates the original offer. Once terminated, the original offer cannot be revived by the seller's later 'acceptance'; at that point she is merely making a new offer the buyer is free to ignore. Choice C is the classic trap: there is no 'minor change' exception. Choice D is wrong because earnest money is a good-faith deposit, not what makes an offer or contract binding.90. A broker's listing on a house expired without a sale, ending the agency relationship. Months later the house is back on the market with a different brokerage, and a buyer now working with the former listing agent asks: 'You used to represent that seller — what's the lowest price they'd actually take?' May the agent share this information?
- A. No — confidentiality survives termination of the agency, and the seller's lowest acceptable price is exactly the kind of information it protects
- B. Yes — the duty of confidentiality ended when the listing expired along with the rest of the agency
- C. Yes — the agent's duties now run to the buyer, so withholding the information would be disloyal to the current customer
- D. No — and the agent is barred from ever working with any buyer interested in that property
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Agency can terminate by expiration, but the duty of confidentiality survives termination and specifically bars revealing information that would harm the former principal's bargaining position, such as the seller's lowest acceptable price. Choice B is the tempting misconception — that all duties die with the agency; confidentiality is the exception. Choice D overreaches: the agent may work with the buyer, they simply cannot disclose the former client's confidences.91. A salesperson represents a seller. At a showing, an unrepresented buyer — a customer — asks the salesperson two questions: whether the property has any problems the salesperson knows about, and the lowest price the seller would actually accept. The salesperson knows the basement floods every spring and also knows the seller is privately willing to take substantially less than the list price. What must the salesperson do?
- A. Disclose the basement flooding but refuse to reveal the seller's bottom-line price.
- B. Answer both questions fully, because honesty requires complete answers to a buyer's direct questions.
- C. Decline to answer either question, because the salesperson owes duties only to the seller.
- D. Reveal the seller's bottom line but stay silent on the flooding, because property condition is the seller's own duty to disclose.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Customers are owed honesty, fair dealing, and disclosure of known material defects — recurring basement flooding is such a defect, so it must be disclosed. But confidentiality to the seller-client prohibits revealing information that would harm the seller's bargaining position, such as the lowest acceptable price. Choice B is the trap: honesty to customers never extends to betraying the client's confidential pricing position, while choice C ignores that even customers are owed defect disclosure.92. Which of the following events, by itself, creates an agency relationship between a property owner and a real estate licensee?
- A. The licensee shows the owner's property to several prospective buyers.
- B. The owner authorizes the licensee to act on the owner's behalf in dealings with third parties.
- C. The licensee pays annual dues to the local multiple listing service.
- D. A buyer submits a written offer to purchase the owner's property.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
An agency relationship is created when a principal authorizes an agent to act on the principal's behalf in dealings with third parties. Choice A is tempting because showing a property looks like agency-type activity, but activity alone does not create agency — the defining event is the principal's authorization, not the licensee's conduct or a buyer's offer.93. A buyer includes an earnest money check with a written purchase offer. Which statement correctly describes this deposit?
- A. It is a good-faith deposit that is held in the broker's trust account.
- B. It is the consideration that makes the purchase contract legally binding.
- C. It may be kept in the brokerage's general operating account until closing.
- D. It is legally required before any purchase offer can be submitted.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Earnest money is a good-faith deposit held in the broker's trust account. Choice B is the classic trap: earnest money is not by itself evidence of consideration, and it is not among the essential elements of a valid contract, so it is not what binds the agreement (which also rules out D). Holding it in a general operating account, as in C, would improperly mix client funds with brokerage funds.94. A seller-client gives the listing salesperson two lawful instructions: hold no open houses, and present every written offer no matter how low. The salesperson believes open houses would sell the home faster and considers quietly skipping the lowest offers to save the seller time. Which fiduciary duty requires the salesperson to follow the seller's instructions anyway?
- A. Obedience
- B. Reasonable care and diligence
- C. Accounting
- D. Confidentiality
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Among the OLD CAR fiduciary duties (Obedience, Loyalty, Disclosure, Confidentiality, Accounting, Reasonable care), obedience is the duty that binds the agent to the principal's lawful instructions even when the agent's professional judgment differs. Choice B is the tempting wrong answer — reasonable care concerns the agent's competence and diligence, but professional opinion does not override a client's lawful directions.
Financing
6 questions95. A buyer is purchasing a home with a conventional loan and plans to make a ten percent down payment. The buyer asks the salesperson whether any mortgage insurance will be involved. What should the salesperson explain?
- A. Private mortgage insurance is generally required because the down payment is less than twenty percent of the purchase price.
- B. No mortgage insurance applies, because only FHA loans ever involve mortgage insurance.
- C. The Federal Housing Administration will automatically insure the loan since the down payment is under twenty percent.
- D. No mortgage insurance is required as long as the buyer chooses a fixed-rate loan.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Private mortgage insurance is generally required on conventional loans when the borrower's down payment is less than twenty percent of the purchase price, and a ten percent down payment falls below that threshold. Choice C is the tempting confusion: FHA insurance applies to FHA loans, not conventional ones — a conventional loan is by definition not insured by the federal government, which is exactly why private mortgage insurance fills the gap. Whether the rate is fixed or adjustable (choice D) has nothing to do with the PMI requirement.96. Two neighboring states treat mortgage financing differently. In State X, a borrower who finances a home keeps title to the property while the lender holds only a lien against it. In State Y, legal title is held by the lender or a trustee until the debt is repaid. How are these two states properly classified?
- A. State X is a lien-theory state, and State Y is a title-theory state.
- B. State X is a title-theory state, and State Y is a lien-theory state.
- C. Both are lien-theory states, because a borrower who occupies the property always retains title.
- D. Both are title-theory states, because every mortgage transfers legal title to the lender.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
In lien-theory states the borrower retains title and the lender holds a lien — which matches State X. In title-theory states legal title is held by the lender or a trustee until the debt is repaid — which matches State Y. Choice B simply reverses the two labels, the most common error; choices C and D wrongly assume a single nationwide rule when the two theories differ on precisely this point: who holds legal title while the loan is outstanding.97. A seller's existing mortgage carries an attractive interest rate, and its documents include a due-on-sale clause. A buyer proposes to purchase the home and simply take over the seller's monthly payments without ever contacting the lender. What is the likely consequence of this plan?
- A. The lender may demand full repayment of the loan balance upon the sale, so the buyer cannot assume the loan without lender approval.
- B. The plan works, because a due-on-sale clause binds only the original seller, not a new buyer.
- C. The parties need only notify the lender after closing; the assumption then becomes automatic.
- D. The lender may raise the interest rate to the current market rate but cannot call the entire balance due.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
A due-on-sale clause allows the lender to demand full repayment if the property is sold, which is exactly what prevents a buyer from assuming the loan without lender approval — the parties' informal takeover exposes the entire balance to being called due. Choice D is the tempting wrong answer: the clause is an acceleration device, not a rate-adjustment device; it permits the lender to demand the full balance, not merely reprice the loan. Notice alone (choice C) does not substitute for the lender's approval.98. A buyer purchases a home for 280,000 dollars using a 250,000 dollar loan. To lower the note rate, the buyer agrees at closing to pay two discount points. How much will the buyer pay for the discount points?
- A. 2,500 dollars
- B. 2,800 dollars
- C. 5,000 dollars
- D. 5,600 dollars
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
One discount point equals one percent of the loan amount, so two points on a 250,000 dollar loan cost two percent of 250,000 dollars, which is 5,000 dollars. The tempting wrong answer is 5,600 dollars (choice D), which computes the points on the 280,000 dollar purchase price — points are a percentage of the loan, not the price. Choice A (2,500 dollars) charges only one point instead of two. Remember that discount points are prepaid interest paid at closing to buy down the note rate.99. In a typical financed home purchase, the buyer signs both a promissory note and a mortgage (or deed of trust). What is the function of the mortgage or deed of trust?
- A. It contains the borrower's personal promise to repay the debt.
- B. It pledges the property as security for repayment of the promissory note.
- C. It conveys title to the property from the seller to the buyer at closing.
- D. It insures the lender against title defects that existed when the loan was made.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
A mortgage or deed of trust pledges the property itself as security for repayment of the promissory note. Choice A is the tempting wrong answer: the promise to repay resides in the promissory note, while the mortgage or deed of trust is the security instrument that backs it. A deed (choice C) is the instrument that conveys title, and title insurance (choice D) is what protects against unknown title defects existing at the time a policy is issued.100. A loan officer describes three financing options to a homebuyer. Which of the officer's statements is accurate?
- A. A conventional loan is insured by the Federal Housing Administration.
- B. An FHA loan is guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs.
- C. A VA loan is guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs for eligible veterans.
- D. A conventional loan is guaranteed by the federal government for first-time buyers.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
A VA loan is guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs for eligible veterans. A conventional loan is, by definition, not insured or guaranteed by the federal government, and an FHA loan is insured by the Federal Housing Administration — so choices A, B, and D each attach the wrong government role (or a nonexistent one) to the loan type. The classic trap is swapping 'insured' (FHA) with 'guaranteed' (VA).
Showing 100 of 161 questions.
2026 statistics
Key facts: Georgia Real Estate Salesperson exam
- Questions
- 152
- Passing score
- Pass required on both portions
- Exam fee
- $175
- Governing body
- Georgia Real Estate Commission (GREC)
This free Georgia Real Estate Salesperson practice test has 161 original questions written to Georgia Real Estate Commission (GREC)'s official content outline, last checked against it on August 6, 2026, 100 of them listed on this page and the rest loaded by the drill. Every question shows a worked explanation, and nothing here requires a signup.
The questions are grouped under six outline areas: Property Ownership and Land Use, Valuation and Market Analysis, Contracts and Agency, Financing, State License Law and Practice and Transfer of Title and Closing.
As of 2026, the Georgia Real Estate Salesperson exam fee is $175.
How the Georgia Real Estate Salesperson practice bank covers the outline
161 questions across 6 outline areas — the same areas the page's sections use.
Counts are the live question bank, grouped by the outline area each question was written to.
Exam format and study resources
More in this family
Real Estate Salesperson licensing
In the same family
- Real Estate Salesperson ExamPractice questions →
- California Real Estate Salesperson ExamPractice questions →
- Utah Real Estate Sales Agent ExamPractice questions →
- Nevada Real Estate Salesperson ExamPractice questions →
- Maryland Real Estate Salesperson ExamPractice questions →
- Michigan Real Estate Salesperson ExamPractice questions →
- New Jersey Real Estate Salesperson ExamPractice questions →
- Massachusetts Real Estate Salesperson ExamPractice questions →
- New York Real Estate Salesperson ExamPractice questions →
- Connecticut Real Estate Salesperson ExamPractice questions →
- Oklahoma Provisional Sales Associate ExamPractice questions →
- Washington, D.C. Real Estate Salesperson ExamPractice questions →
Get a free Georgia Real Estate Salesperson study plan
A week-by-week plan plus new practice questions, straight to your inbox.
Official sources
Primary documents used to verify the exam details shown on this page.
- Georgia Real Estate Candidate Information BulletinPSI / Georgia Real Estate Commissiontest-takers.psiexams.comeffective July 1, 2026
- Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025 — Real Estate Sales Agents (SOC 41-9022)U.S. Bureau of Labor Statisticsbls.goveffective May 31, 2025
- Rule 520-1-.05 — Maintaining a LicenseGeorgia Real Estate Commissiongrec.state.ga.useffective July 1, 2025
- Rule 520-1-.04 — Obtaining a LicenseGeorgia Real Estate Commissiongrec.state.ga.us
Last verified against the official exam content outline:
Frequently asked questions
How many questions on the Georgia salesperson exam are state-specific, and how should I split my study time?
The Georgia portion of the PSI exam is not one undifferentiated block — it is broken into named content areas with fixed item counts. State Laws and Rules carries 16 items, Real Estate Practice in Georgia carries 21 items, and Finance and Closing carries 15 items. That means Real Estate Practice in Georgia alone is worth more than the State Laws and Rules section, which is where most candidates over-invest by memorizing GREC rule numbers. A practical split: give the practice-oriented material the largest share of your review, treat license-law rules as high-yield but finite memorization, and drill finance separately because those 15 items are usually computational rather than recall-based. You also get up to 15 minutes for the pre-exam tutorial, which does not count against your testing time — use it to settle in rather than rushing through it.
What do the Georgia education and fee requirements actually cost me in hours and dollars, start to finish?
Budget for both the pre-exam and post-exam obligations, because candidates routinely forget the second one. Before you test, you complete the required 75-hour Salesperson's Prelicense Course. The examination fee is $175 and the license fee is $170. After your license is issued, you must complete at least 25 instructional hours of post-license education within one year of issuance — miss that window and the license is at risk, so treat it as part of the initial commitment rather than an afterthought. On an ongoing basis, renewal requires 36 instructional hours of continuing education, of which at least 3 hours must cover license law. Veterans should note a separate benefit: service of one year or more, with at least 90 days served during wartime, can earn a credit of five points.
Which agency and fair housing traps show up most often, and how do I avoid losing points on them?
Three patterns account for a large share of missed items.<br><br>First, client versus customer. An agency relationship arises when a principal authorizes an agent to act on their behalf in dealings with third parties, and clients are owed the OLD CAR duties: Obedience, Loyalty, Disclosure, Confidentiality, Accounting, and Reasonable care. Customers are owed only honesty, fair dealing, and disclosure of known material defects — not fiduciary duties. If a question says "customer," stop looking for a fiduciary answer.<br><br>Second, the duties that outlast or constrain the deal. Confidentiality survives termination of the agency and bars revealing the seller's lowest acceptable price — so a licensee who volunteers that number after the listing expires still violates the duty. Loyalty requires placing the principal's interests above the agent's own and avoiding conflicts of interest, and accounting requires safeguarding entrusted funds and prohibits commingling client money with the agent's own funds. Dual agency is legal only with the informed written consent of both parties, and the dual agent cannot advocate for one party against the other. Note also that agency terminates by completion, expiration, mutual agreement, revocation, renunciation, or operation of law such as death or incapacity — "the seller died" is a termination answer, not a breach answer.<br><br>Third, fair housing exemptions. The Mrs. Murphy exemption for owner-occupied buildings of four or fewer units never applies to race and cannot be used with discriminatory advertising or a licensee. Advertising indicating a preference or limitation based on a protected class is illegal even if the transaction would be exempt, and the Civil Rights Act of 1866 prohibits all racial discrimination in property transactions with no exemptions. So any answer choice that says race discrimination was permissible because of an exemption is wrong on two independent grounds.
What math do I need to be able to do cold for the Finance and Closing section?
With 15 items in Finance and Closing, the math is worth committing to muscle memory. Master these:<br><br><b>Commission.</b> Commission equals sale price multiplied by the commission rate. A $300,000 sale at six percent yields an $18,000 commission, which is then split per the brokers' agreement — read carefully whether the question wants the total or one side's share.<br><br><b>LTV and down payment.</b> LTV is the loan amount divided by the lesser of appraised value or purchase price. A $240,000 loan on a $300,000 property is 80 percent LTV, and the down payment is the remaining 20 percent. The "lesser of" wording is the trap: when the appraisal comes in below contract price, the appraised value drives the calculation. This also ties to PMI, which is generally required on conventional loans when the down payment is less than 20 percent — so an 80 percent LTV is the classic no-PMI threshold.<br><br><b>Proration.</b> Proration divides shared expenses such as taxes, rent, or interest between buyer and seller based on each party's ownership portion, using the closing date as the dividing point. Many exams use a 360-day banker's year with 30-day months, so the daily rate is the annual amount divided by 360. Direction matters: for prepaid expenses the buyer reimburses the seller for the unused portion; for expenses paid in arrears the seller credits the buyer for the seller's share.<br><br><b>Valuation shortcuts.</b> The gross rent multiplier is the sale price divided by the monthly gross rent, and net operating income divided by the capitalization rate yields the estimated value of an income property.<br><br><b>Points.</b> Discount points are prepaid interest paid at closing to lower the note rate, with one point equal to one percent of the loan amount — note that it is one percent of the loan, not the sale price.