CPA Exam Cheat Sheet.
The night-before summary, built like the exam.
Download the PDFStructure & scoring
- 4 sections, 16 hours: three 4-hour Cores (AUD · FAR · REG) + ONE 4-hour Discipline of your choice (BAR · ISC · TCP)
- Pass = 75 on a 0-99 scale — NOT a percentage correct, NOT curved
- Weighting: 50% MCQ / 50% TBS everywhere except ISC (60/40) — simulations are half your score
- AICPA writes and scores · NASBA (CPAES) processes applications and reports scores · your state board owns eligibility and the license
- Eligibility must be declared BEFORE applying; education/experience rules vary by jurisdiction · pass rates published quarterly
AUD anchors
- Audit risk = inherent × control × detection — detection is the auditor's lever (inverse to assessed risk)
- Opinion grid: material misstatement → qualified; material + pervasive → adverse · scope limit → qualified; pervasive limit → disclaimer
- Going concern + adequate disclosure = unmodified + emphasis paragraph
- Evidence: direct external confirmation > external-held-by-client > internal · originals > copies
- Engagement letter opens · management rep letter closes (refusal = scope limitation) · working papers belong to the auditor
- COSO: control environment is the foundation · analytics required at planning + final review
- Independence: ANY direct financial interest impairs — no materiality floor · PCAOB = issuers, ASB = nonissuers
- Service ladder: compilation (no assurance) → review (limited: inquiry + analytics) → audit (reasonable)
FAR anchors
- Revenue: contract → obligations → price → allocate → recognize as satisfied
- Rising costs: LIFO = lowest inventory & income · FIFO = reverse
- Market rate > coupon = discount (amortization raises interest expense)
- Ownership ladder: <20% fair value · 20-50% equity method (dividends REDUCE the investment) · >50% consolidate
- Finance lease = amortization + interest (front-loaded) · operating = one straight-line cost
- Contingency: probable + estimable = accrue · possible = disclose · gains never accrued early
- Fair value: L1 identical-active quote · L2 observable-similar · L3 unobservable
- Treasury stock cuts equity, never income · change in estimate = prospective, error = restate
- Governmental funds = modified accrual/current resources · NFP = two net-asset classes (with/without donor restrictions)
- Basic EPS = (income − preferred dividends) ÷ weighted-average shares
REG anchors
- Contract = assent + consideration · UCC goods ≥ $500 need a writing (4 exceptions)
- Apparent authority survives private revocation until third parties get notice
- 1933 Act = new issues · 1934 Act = secondary trading + SEC
- LLC members risk only investment (absent guarantee/veil-piercing) · LP needs ≥1 general partner + state filing
- Exclusions: muni interest, physical-injury damages (punitives taxable) · tax benefit rule governs recoveries
- NOLs: indefinite carryforward, 80% of taxable income cap · inherited property = automatic long-term
- Penalties: accuracy 20% · civil fraud 75% · trust-fund liability hits responsible + willful persons personally
- Preparers may not use/disclose return info without specific consent
Discipline choice
- BAR ← extends FAR (reporting/advisory) · ISC ← near AUD (systems/SOC) · TCP ← extends REG (tax careers)
- Pair the Discipline right after its related Core · license is identical whichever you choose
Night before
- Re-run the AUD opinion grid and FAR ownership ladder — highest-frequency, most-confusable tables
- Remember: TBS = half the score (ISC: 40%) — pace the exam accordingly
- Logistics and credit-window rules are your board's — confirm from its site, not third-hand numbers
Frequently asked questions
What deserves the final pre-exam review?
The two most confusable tables: AUD's opinion grid (qualified versus adverse versus disclaimer, by misstatement-or-scope and material-or-pervasive) and FAR's ownership ladder (fair value below 20%, equity method 20-50%, consolidation above 50%). Add REG's penalty tiers (20% accuracy, 75% fraud) and the 1933-versus-1934 Act split, and you have covered the highest-frequency confusion points.
Is 75 the same as answering 75 percent correctly?
No — and the AICPA says so explicitly. Scores are reported on a 0-99 scale as a weighted combination of scaled scores that accounts for question difficulty; the reported number is neither a percentage correct nor a curve against other candidates. Chasing a raw-percentage target in practice is fine as a habit, but the real exam's scaling makes difficult-question performance count for more.
What logistics should I confirm before scheduling?
Three things from your own jurisdiction: that you have been declared eligible (required before applying for any section), your board's education and experience requirements, and its current conditional-credit window for passed sections — boards have adjusted these windows recently, so confirm the current policy from your board directly rather than trusting any fixed number in prep materials.
Sources
- 1.CPA Exam scoring and pass rates — AICPA & CIMA — AICPA (accessed Aug 7, 2026)
- 2.CPA Exam — AICPA & CIMA — AICPA (accessed Aug 7, 2026)
- 3.CPA Exam — NASBA — National Association of State Boards of Accountancy (NASBA) (accessed Aug 7, 2026)
Official sources
Every exam fact on this page traces to a primary document published by the body that administers the exam.
- CPA Exam — AICPA & CIMAAICPAaicpa-cima.com
- CPA Exam scoring and pass rates — AICPA & CIMAAICPAaicpa-cima.com
- CPA Exam — NASBANational Association of State Boards of Accountancy (NASBA)nasba.org
Last verified against the official exam content outline: