Series 82 Practice Exam.
Free practice test — 61 verified questions, instant feedback.
Browse all questions & answers
1. A private securities offerings representative is preparing to solicit prospective investors for a Rule 506(c) offering that will use general advertising, including a public website landing page. Before accepting any investor's subscription, the issuer must:
- A. Take reasonable steps to verify that the investor is actually accredited, beyond mere self-certification
- B. Limit the offering to no more than 35 investors regardless of accreditation
- C. File a registration statement with the SEC prior to closing
- D. Confirm the investor has a pre-existing relationship with the firm
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
In an offering that uses general solicitation, the issuer loses the ability to rely on investor self-certification alone and must take affirmative, reasonable verification steps such as reviewing financial documentation or obtaining third-party confirmation; a pre-existing relationship requirement and the 35-investor limit belong to the exemption that prohibits public advertising, and the offering itself remains unregistered.2. A representative wants to solicit a private placement offering to a prospect met for the first time at a public investment conference open to the general public, using no prior relationship. Under an offering exemption that prohibits general solicitation, this outreach is:
- A. Impermissible only if the prospect declines to invest
- B. Impermissible, because the exemption requires a pre-existing, substantive relationship or another recognized basis for the offer
- C. Permissible, as long as the prospect ultimately turns out to be accredited
- D. Permissible, because any securities professional may approach any conference attendee
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Offerings relying on the exemption that bars general solicitation may only be offered to persons with whom the issuer or its representative has a pre-existing, substantive relationship or through other narrow means; approaching a stranger at an open public conference is the kind of broad, untargeted outreach the prohibition on general solicitation is designed to prevent, regardless of the prospect's eventual accreditation status.3. A registered representative is drafting a sales brochure to solicit investors into a real estate private placement. The brochure includes a projected 15% annual cash-on-cash return without any risk disclosure or reference to the offering's actual risk factors. This brochure is problematic chiefly because:
- A. Only the issuer, not the representative, bears responsibility for brochure content
- B. Promotional material that highlights potential returns without balanced risk disclosure can be misleading and must be consistent with, and no more favorable than, the approved offering documents
- C. Sales brochures may never mention projected returns of any kind
- D. The brochure must be filed with the SEC before use
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Communications used to solicit investors must present a fair and balanced picture, and any performance projection needs to be accompanied by appropriate risk disclosure consistent with the offering memorandum; a brochure that emphasizes upside while omitting the risks the PPM describes creates a misleading impression, and the representative sharing it bears responsibility for its content and consistency with the approved offering materials.4. A prospect tells a representative he wants to invest in a Rule 506(b) private placement and states, unprompted, that his net worth exceeds the accredited investor threshold. The representative accepts this statement without requesting documentation. For a 506(b) offering, this practice is:
- A. Acceptable only if the issuer is a reporting company
- B. Never acceptable under any circumstances
- C. Acceptable only for institutional investors
- D. Generally acceptable, because 506(b) offerings permit reliance on an investor's self-certification of accredited status
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Unlike offerings that use general solicitation, a 506(b) offering does not impose a heightened verification standard on the issuer, so reasonable reliance on an investor's own representations of accredited status is generally sufficient; that flexibility is one of the trade-offs for not being permitted to advertise broadly, and it does not extend to offerings that solicit through public advertising.5. An issuer conducting a Rule 506(b) offering wants to include up to 35 non-accredited purchasers alongside an unlimited number of accredited investors. For each non-accredited purchaser, the representative should evaluate whether that investor:
- A. Has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to evaluate the merits and risks of the investment
- B. Is a family member of an existing accredited investor in the deal
- C. Has previously purchased shares in a publicly traded company
- D. Has a net worth exceeding the accredited investor threshold, since accreditation is still required
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Rule 506(b) permits sales to a limited number of non-accredited purchasers, but each of them must meet a sophistication standard, possessing alone or with a purchaser representative sufficient knowledge and experience to evaluate the investment's merits and risks; prior ownership of unrelated public stock or a family relationship to an accredited investor does not satisfy that standard, and net worth is irrelevant since these purchasers are by definition non-accredited.6. A firm's written supervisory procedures require prior principal approval before any new sales literature describing a private placement may be used with prospective investors. A representative who distributes a self-created flyer summarizing the offering without that approval has:
- A. Acted properly, since supervisory approval only applies to advertising, not one-on-one communications
- B. Violated no rule, because the flyer was distributed to only one prospect
- C. Acted properly, since the flyer merely summarizes information already in the PPM
- D. Violated the firm's supervisory procedures governing communications with the public
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Firm supervisory procedures generally require that sales literature and other communications used to solicit investors be reviewed and approved by a principal before use, regardless of how many prospects receive it or whether the representative believes it merely restates the PPM; bypassing that review defeats the purpose of the firm's control over what is being represented to the public and undermines investor protection.7. During a solicitation call, a representative tells a prospect that the private placement 'is virtually guaranteed to return at least 8% annually because the sponsor has never had a losing deal.' This statement is most accurately characterized as:
- A. Acceptable if the representative genuinely believes the statement is true
- B. Acceptable market color, since it reflects the sponsor's historical track record
- C. Acceptable, provided the 8% figure appears somewhere in the PPM
- D. A prohibited, misleading guarantee of performance that overstates certainty and omits the investment's inherent risk
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Representing a speculative, illiquid private placement as virtually guaranteed to achieve a specific return misrepresents the fundamentally uncertain nature of the investment and omits the risk of loss that private placements carry; a sponsor's past results do not guarantee future performance, and neither sincere belief nor a matching figure elsewhere in the PPM cures a statement that creates a false impression of certainty.8. An institutional bank is being solicited to purchase units of a private placement. For purposes of determining accredited investor status, this institution:
- A. Must still satisfy the individual net worth test applicable to natural persons
- B. Cannot qualify as accredited because it is not a natural person
- C. Qualifies only if a majority of its individual officers are independently accredited
- D. Generally qualifies as an accredited investor based on its institutional status, without an individual net worth or income test
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Certain categories of entities, including banks and other regulated financial institutions, qualify as accredited investors by virtue of their institutional status rather than by satisfying the income or net worth tests that apply to natural persons; the individual accreditation status of the institution's officers is not the relevant test for the entity itself.9. A representative wants to solicit investors for a private placement in several states. Because Reg D securities are considered covered securities under federal law, state securities regulators:
- A. Are generally preempted from merit review but may still require a notice filing and fee
- B. Have no role whatsoever in Reg D offerings
- C. May still conduct a full merit review and deny the offering within their state
- D. May require the issuer to register the securities at the state level before any solicitation
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Federal preemption for covered securities limits states to procedural notice filings and fees rather than substantive merit review of the offering's terms; this does not eliminate the state's role entirely, but it does prevent a state regulator from blocking or second-guessing the economic merits of a properly conducted Reg D offering the way it might for a fully state-registered security.10. What is the fundamental difference between Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c) private placement exemptions that a representative must understand before soliciting investors?
- A. 506(c) offerings are limited to $1 million in total proceeds, while 506(b) offerings have no dollar limit
- B. 506(b) requires SEC registration of the securities, while 506(c) does not
- C. 506(b) offerings may only be sold to institutions, while 506(c) offerings may only be sold to individuals
- D. 506(b) prohibits general solicitation and allows self-certified accreditation, while 506(c) permits general solicitation but requires verified accredited-investor status
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
The core distinction representatives must internalize is the trade-off between advertising freedom and verification burden: 506(b) forbids general solicitation but allows issuers to reasonably rely on investor self-certification, while 506(c) allows broad advertising but requires the issuer to take affirmative steps to verify each purchaser is actually accredited; neither exemption requires SEC registration of the securities, and neither is limited by investor type or a stated dollar cap in this way.11. A representative wants to include a link to the firm's private placement offering page directly within a widely distributed print advertisement in a regional newspaper, under an offering that relies on Rule 506(b). This advertisement is:
- A. Permissible if the ad is placed only once
- B. Permissible because print media is not covered by general solicitation rules
- C. Permissible because newspaper readers are presumed to have pre-existing relationships with the firm
- D. Impermissible, because a widely distributed newspaper advertisement is a form of general solicitation prohibited under 506(b)
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
General solicitation restrictions are medium-neutral; they apply to broadly distributed print advertisements just as they apply to email blasts or public webinars. Nothing about newspaper readers implies a pre-existing relationship with the firm, and running the ad only once does not change its fundamentally public, untargeted character, which is incompatible with 506(b)'s prohibition on advertising.12. A private securities offerings representative is asked by a prospect to provide return projections that are more optimistic than those disclosed in the private placement memorandum, in order to help close the deal. The representative should:
- A. Decline only if the firm's compliance department is unavailable to review the request
- B. Comply, but only if the prospect signs a waiver acknowledging the more optimistic figures
- C. Decline, since sales materials and verbal representations must be consistent with the disclosures in the approved offering documents
- D. Comply, since verbal statements are not considered part of the offering's disclosure
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Whether written or verbal, any performance information a representative shares with a prospect must be consistent with what is disclosed in the offering documents; providing more optimistic figures than the PPM creates a material inconsistency that misleads the investor, and neither the informal nature of a verbal statement nor a signed waiver changes the fact that the investor is being given inaccurate information to induce the purchase.13. A representative wants to distribute a one-page teaser describing an unnamed private placement's general strategy and target returns to a broad list of prospects who have no relationship with the firm, before revealing the issuer's identity or offering documents. If the exemption being relied on prohibits general solicitation, this teaser:
- A. Is permitted as long as it does not mention a specific target return
- B. Is always prohibited regardless of content or distribution
- C. Can still constitute impermissible general solicitation, since withholding the issuer's name does not change the fact that securities are effectively being offered to an untargeted audience
- D. Is always permitted because the issuer's name is withheld
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
General solicitation is evaluated by the nature and breadth of the communication and whether it functions as an offer to an untargeted audience, not merely by whether the issuer's name is disclosed; a teaser broadly distributed to unrelated prospects that describes a specific deal's strategy and returns can still function as a prohibited advertisement even with identifying details omitted.14. A registered representative privately arranges for a customer to invest directly with an issuer in a private placement, receiving a commission from the issuer, without notifying or obtaining approval from his broker-dealer. This practice is best described as:
- A. A prohibited private securities transaction, commonly called selling away, because it was conducted outside the scope of the representative's employment without firm approval
- B. Permitted, since the representative is licensed and the investment is legitimate
- C. A violation only if the customer loses money on the investment
- D. Permitted, as long as the commission is later disclosed to the firm after closing
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Engaging in a securities transaction outside the regular course of employment with a member firm, particularly one involving compensation, generally requires prior written notice to and approval from the firm; conducting it secretly deprives the firm of the ability to supervise the transaction and is a violation regardless of whether the underlying investment is legitimate, whether disclosure happens later, or whether the customer ultimately profits or loses money.15. Why is it important for a private securities offerings representative to distinguish between accredited investor status and sophisticated investor status when soliciting a Rule 506(b) offering?
- A. Because accredited investors are always institutions, while sophisticated investors are always individuals
- B. Because unlimited accredited investors may participate, while non-accredited participants must independently meet a sophistication standard and are capped in number
- C. Because only sophisticated investors may ever purchase private placements
- D. Because the two terms are interchangeable and require no distinction
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
These are separate, non-interchangeable concepts under 506(b): there is no limit on the number of accredited investors who may purchase, but non-accredited purchasers are capped at 35 and each must independently satisfy a sophistication test evaluating their financial knowledge and experience; neither category is defined by whether the investor is an institution or an individual.16. An issuer conducting a Rule 506(b) offering asks its selling representatives to solicit an existing email list of 2,000 prior newsletter subscribers who opted in years ago to receive general market commentary from the firm, none of whom have any other relationship with the firm or its registered representatives. Soliciting this list for the private placement is best analyzed as:
- A. Automatically permissible, because the subscribers previously opted in to receive some communications from the firm
- B. Permissible only if the firm removes non-accredited subscribers from the list first, without any relationship analysis
- C. Likely impermissible general solicitation, because a generic newsletter opt-in does not, by itself, establish the substantive relationship 506(b) requires before offering a specific private placement
- D. Automatically impermissible regardless of any prior relationship, because email is a prohibited medium
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
A pre-existing, substantive relationship for 506(b) purposes generally requires enough of a relationship for the firm to have formed a reasonable basis to evaluate the prospect's financial sophistication or status, not merely that the person once agreed to receive newsletters; a broad opt-in list built for general commentary does not, without more, satisfy that standard, so soliciting a specific private placement to the whole list risks being treated as impermissible general solicitation regardless of the medium or later filtering by accreditation.17. A prospect who is not accredited asks a representative to introduce him to a Rule 506(c) offering that is being advertised publicly. The representative should explain that:
- A. He is not eligible to purchase, since Rule 506(c) offerings, despite permitting broad advertising, may only be sold to verified accredited investors
- B. He is eligible only if he obtains a waiver from the SEC
- C. He is eligible as long as he is one of no more than 35 non-accredited purchasers
- D. He is eligible because 506(c) offerings have no purchaser qualification requirements
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
The trade-off for the broad advertising allowed under Rule 506(c) is that every purchaser must be an accredited investor whose status the issuer has taken reasonable steps to verify; the 35 non-accredited purchaser allowance belongs to Rule 506(b), not 506(c), and there is no waiver process that allows a non-accredited investor into a 506(c) offering.18. A firm's written supervisory procedures require that any communication soliciting investors for a private placement include balanced risk disclosure and avoid predictions of specific investment outcomes. A representative submits marketing copy stating the deal should easily outperform the stock market, without qualification. A principal reviewing this copy under the firm's procedures should most likely:
- A. Approve it only if the representative adds his personal signature to the copy
- B. Approve it, since should easily outperform is not a specific numeric prediction
- C. Approve it, since it reflects the representative's genuine opinion
- D. Reject it, since an unqualified comparative outperformance claim functions as a prediction of outcome and lacks the required balanced risk disclosure
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
A statement asserting the investment should easily outperform the stock market functions as a prediction of a specific, favorable outcome relative to a benchmark, even without a numeric figure attached, and it lacks any accompanying risk disclosure; supervisory procedures requiring balanced, non-predictive communications call for a principal to reject or require revision of such copy rather than approve it based on the absence of a specific number or the representative's sincerity.19. A representative wants to begin discussing a specific Rule 506(b) private placement with a prospective investor who is a longtime personal friend but has never discussed investments or done business with the representative professionally. Before making the offer, the representative should evaluate whether:
- A. The friendship alone, regardless of any financial discussions, automatically satisfies the pre-existing relationship requirement
- B. The friend must first sign a non-disclosure agreement before any relationship can be considered substantive
- C. The relationship is substantive enough to give the representative a reasonable basis to assess the friend's financial circumstances and sophistication, not merely social familiarity
- D. No relationship analysis is needed because friends are always exempt from solicitation rules
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
A pre-existing relationship sufficient to support a 506(b) offer must be substantive enough to give the offeror a reasonable basis to evaluate the prospect's financial sophistication or status; mere social acquaintance, without any financial or business dimension, does not automatically meet that bar, so representatives should assess the actual substance of the relationship rather than assuming personal friendship alone qualifies.20. A customer wants to invest an amount equal to nearly all of her liquid net worth into a single private placement, stating she understands the risk and simply wants the highest possible return. The representative should:
- A. Address the concentration risk directly with the customer and document the suitability analysis, since a single illiquid position representing nearly all liquid assets raises concerns regardless of the customer's stated risk appetite
- B. Proceed only after increasing the size of the investment to guarantee diversification
- C. Automatically reject the order, since concentrated positions are always prohibited
- D. Proceed without further discussion, since the customer has verbally accepted the risk
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
A customer's verbal willingness to accept risk does not eliminate the representative's obligation to evaluate whether concentrating nearly all liquid assets into one illiquid position is suitable; the representative should discuss the concentration risk, ensure the customer genuinely understands the illiquidity and loss potential involved, and document that suitability analysis, rather than simply proceeding on the customer's say-so or rejecting the order outright without discussion.21. When opening a new account for a customer who intends to purchase a private placement, which of the following is a core piece of information the representative must obtain and evaluate as part of the customer's investment profile?
- A. The customer's investment objectives and risk tolerance
- B. The number of brokerage firms the customer has previously used
- C. The customer's preferred time of day for phone calls
- D. The customer's favorite investment news source
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
A customer's investment objectives and risk tolerance form the core of the profile a representative must obtain and evaluate to determine whether any recommended investment, including a private placement, is suitable; details like a preferred news source, number of prior brokerage relationships, or call-time preference are administrative or immaterial to the suitability analysis.22. During account opening, a representative learns a prospective investor's income has fluctuated significantly over the past three years, exceeding the accredited investor income threshold in two of the three years but falling short in the most recent year. In evaluating income-based accreditation, the representative should generally focus on:
- A. Whether the prospect's income exceeded the threshold at any single point in time, regardless of pattern
- B. Only the single highest income year on record, regardless of recency
- C. The prospect's average income across his entire working career
- D. Whether the prospect had qualifying income in each of the two most recent years and has a reasonable expectation of reaching the threshold in the current year
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
The income test for accredited investor status generally looks at whether a person had qualifying income in each of the two most recent years, together with a reasonable expectation of reaching the same level in the current year, rather than any single high year, a lifetime average, or a one-time peak; a prospect whose income dipped in the most recent of those two years would not clearly satisfy the standard pattern the test looks for.23. A married couple wants to jointly qualify as accredited investors under the net worth test for a private placement. Which of the following is most relevant to that determination?
- A. The couple's combined net worth, excluding the value of their primary residence, is evaluated against the applicable threshold
- B. Only the higher-earning spouse's net worth is considered
- C. Joint accreditation is never permitted; each spouse must invest separately
- D. Each spouse's net worth must independently exceed the individual net worth threshold
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Spouses may generally combine assets to satisfy the net worth test for accredited investor status, with the combined figure evaluated against the applicable threshold and the value of the primary residence excluded from the calculation; requiring each spouse to independently meet the full threshold, considering only one spouse's assets, or barring joint qualification altogether misstates how the joint net worth approach works.24. A prospect's new account application for a private placement lists his investment objective as capital preservation and his risk tolerance as conservative. The representative is nonetheless considering recommending a speculative, illiquid private placement with a high risk of loss. The representative should:
- A. Recognize a mismatch between the stated profile and the proposed investment, and either update the documented profile after a genuine discussion with the customer or decline to recommend the investment
- B. Proceed with the recommendation and simply note the mismatch in an internal file without discussing it with the customer
- C. Proceed with the recommendation, since private placements are inherently sophisticated products suitable for any accredited investor
- D. Change the customer's stated risk tolerance on the account form without consulting the customer, to align with the recommendation
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
A stated objective of capital preservation and conservative risk tolerance is fundamentally inconsistent with a speculative, illiquid private placement, and a representative facing that mismatch must either have a genuine conversation with the customer that results in an updated, accurate profile or decline to make the recommendation; silently noting the conflict or altering the customer's stated profile without the customer's knowledge to justify the recommendation would be improper.25. A prospect who otherwise appears financially qualified for a private placement discloses that a large portion of the funds she intends to invest come from a home equity line of credit taken out specifically to fund this purchase. The representative should treat this disclosure as:
- A. A material factor in the suitability analysis, since funding an illiquid, speculative investment with borrowed money against the investor's home increases risk and warrants closer scrutiny
- B. Irrelevant, since the source of funds does not affect suitability once accreditation is confirmed
- C. Automatically disqualifying for any private placement investment
- D. Relevant only for tax reporting purposes, not for suitability
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Using borrowed funds secured by a home to purchase a speculative, illiquid private placement materially increases the customer's risk exposure, since a decline in the investment's value does not relieve the obligation to repay the loan; this is squarely a suitability concern the representative should probe further, not something to ignore, treat as automatically disqualifying without discussion, or dismiss as merely a tax matter.26. A representative is evaluating a prospect who qualifies as accredited under the net worth test only because of a recent, one-time inheritance that increased his net worth well past the threshold. The prospect has limited investment experience and expresses uncertainty about how private placements work when questioned. In this scenario, the representative's suitability analysis should weigh most heavily on:
- A. Nothing further, since meeting the net worth threshold by any means satisfies both the eligibility and suitability standards
- B. The prospect's family relationships, since inherited wealth requires the same documentation regardless of the prospect's understanding of the product
- C. The prospect's actual understanding of and experience with the investment, since accreditation from a one-time inheritance does not itself establish that the prospect appreciates the risks of an illiquid private placement
- D. The size of the inheritance alone, since it conclusively establishes both eligibility and suitability
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Meeting the accredited investor net worth threshold is a regulatory eligibility gate, not a substitute for suitability; a prospect who only recently and passively became wealthy through inheritance, and who openly expresses limited understanding of how private placements work, presents a suitability concern that the representative must weigh independently of the accreditation determination, since eligibility and genuine comprehension of the risks are separate questions the representative cannot conflate.27. A customer holding units in a private placement asks whether she can simply sell them on a stock exchange whenever she wants extra cash, the way she would with a mutual fund. The representative should clarify that:
- A. Private placement interests trade on major exchanges just like mutual fund shares
- B. The firm is obligated to repurchase the interest from the customer whenever requested
- C. The customer may sell at any brokerage the same day she requests, with guaranteed execution
- D. Private placement interests generally lack a public trading market, so a sale depends on finding a private buyer and satisfying applicable resale conditions, unlike an exchange-traded fund
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Unlike mutual fund shares or exchange-listed securities, private placement interests typically have no established public trading market; an investor who wants liquidity generally must locate a private buyer and satisfy the resale conditions that apply to restricted securities, and neither the broker-dealer nor the issuer is generally obligated to repurchase the interest on demand or guarantee same-day execution.28. Which of the following best describes the purpose of the legend typically placed on restricted securities certificates issued in a private placement?
- A. To specify the dividend rate applicable to the securities
- B. To indicate the securities have already been fully registered with the SEC
- C. To notify holders and transfer agents that the securities are subject to resale restrictions
- D. To identify the broker-dealer that processed the trade for commission purposes
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
A restrictive legend on a private placement security serves to put holders, prospective transferees, and transfer agents on notice that the securities have not been registered and are subject to resale restrictions until an exemption or registration applies; it is not related to commission tracking, does not indicate the securities are registered, and has nothing to do with a dividend rate.29. A representative is reviewing a customer's completed subscription agreement before submitting it to the issuer and notices the customer checked the box representing accredited investor status under the net worth test but left blank the section listing supporting assets and liabilities that would substantiate the claim. The representative should:
- A. Cross out the accredited investor box and substitute a lower qualification standard without consulting the customer
- B. Submit the agreement, but only after independently investing personal funds to demonstrate good faith
- C. Submit the agreement as-is, since checking the box is sufficient regardless of supporting detail
- D. Follow up with the customer to obtain the missing information or documentation needed to support the representation before submission
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
An incomplete subscription agreement that asserts a qualifying status without the supporting detail undermines the reliability of the representation the issuer and firm need to rely on; the appropriate response is to follow up with the customer to complete or substantiate the representation before submitting it, rather than pushing an incomplete form through, unilaterally altering the customer's stated status, or taking unrelated personal action.30. A broker-dealer's books and records requirements for a private securities offering generally require the firm to retain records of the transaction, including subscription documents and correspondence with the investor. The primary regulatory purpose of this recordkeeping obligation is to:
- A. Satisfy a requirement that applies only if the investor requests copies
- B. Provide the sponsor with marketing material for future offerings
- C. Enable regulators and the firm's own supervisory function to review the basis for recommendations and confirm compliance with applicable rules
- D. Allow the representative to claim a tax deduction for record storage costs
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Books and records requirements exist so that regulators and the firm's own supervisory personnel can later reconstruct and review what happened in a transaction, the disclosures made, the suitability basis, and the representations obtained, to confirm the firm and representative complied with applicable rules; the obligation does not depend on investor requests and has nothing to do with marketing reuse or tax deductions for storage.31. A customer purchased into a private placement eighteen months ago and now wants to know whether she can rely on Rule 144 to resell her restricted securities without registering them. The representative should explain that Rule 144 generally permits resale of restricted securities once:
- A. The original PPM has been destroyed
- B. Applicable holding period and other conditions, such as adequate current public information about the issuer where required, have been satisfied
- C. The investor simply requests a waiver from the SEC
- D. The issuer converts from a private company to a sole proprietorship
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Rule 144 provides a resale exemption for restricted securities once conditions such as the applicable holding period and, in some cases, adequate current public information about the issuer are satisfied, among other conditions depending on the issuer and holder; there is no SEC waiver process for individual investors under Rule 144, destroying the PPM has no legal effect on resale rights, and a change in the issuer's form of organization is not a Rule 144 condition.32. A representative learns that the PPM for a private placement discloses a risk factor stating the sponsor has a conflict of interest because it also manages a competing fund that may pursue similar investment opportunities. A prospect asks whether this conflict disqualifies the offering from being recommended. The representative should explain that:
- A. The conflict is irrelevant unless the competing fund is also managed by the same broker-dealer
- B. Disclosed conflicts have no bearing on suitability once they appear in the PPM
- C. The conflict does not automatically disqualify the offering, but it is a material factor the investor should weigh, and disclosure does not relieve the representative of a fair, balanced explanation of its implications
- D. Any disclosed conflict of interest automatically disqualifies an offering from being recommended to any investor
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Disclosure of a conflict of interest in the PPM does not by itself disqualify an offering from being suitable for a given investor, nor does it absolve the representative of responsibility; the representative still needs to make sure the investor understands what the conflict means practically and weighs it as part of the overall decision, since treating disclosure as either an automatic bar or a complete shield misunderstands the role disclosure plays.33. A private placement's offering documents describe funds raised from investors being held in escrow until a stated minimum offering amount is reached. If that minimum is never reached by the offering's contingency deadline, investors should generally expect that:
- A. Their funds are automatically converted into a different security
- B. The issuer may keep a portion of the funds as a penalty for the shortfall
- C. Their funds remain invested regardless of whether the minimum was met
- D. Their subscription funds are returned, since the minimum-maximum contingency was not satisfied
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
A minimum-maximum contingency offering structure holds investor funds in escrow and only releases them to the issuer once the stated minimum has been raised; if the minimum is not reached by the offering's deadline, the standard result is that subscribers' funds are returned to them, rather than being converted into a different security, retained despite the shortfall, or partially forfeited as a penalty.34. A firm's compliance department requires that copies of all executed subscription agreements, PPM delivery confirmations, and suitability documentation for each private placement sale be retained in the customer's file. The main reason firms maintain this documentation is to:
- A. Satisfy a requirement that applies only to non-accredited investor purchases
- B. Provide the sponsor with a mailing list for future unrelated offerings
- C. Allow the firm to bill the customer for document storage fees
- D. Demonstrate, if later questioned by regulators or in a dispute, that appropriate disclosure was made and the recommendation was suitable at the time it occurred
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Maintaining executed subscription agreements, delivery confirmations, and suitability documentation creates a contemporaneous record the firm can point to later if a regulator or an aggrieved customer questions whether proper disclosure was made and whether the recommendation was suitable at the time; this obligation applies broadly, not only to non-accredited purchases, and has nothing to do with generating sponsor mailing lists or billing customers for storage.35. A representative delivers the private placement memorandum to a prospect and, several days later, the prospect signs the subscription agreement without asking any follow-up questions about the risk factors section. The representative should:
- A. Ask the customer to re-sign the agreement using different language he provides verbally
- B. Withhold the PPM from the customer's file since it is no longer needed once signed
- C. Confirm the customer had a reasonable opportunity to review the PPM and address any areas the customer may not have fully considered before treating the subscription as complete
- D. Assume the absence of questions means full understanding and proceed without further inquiry
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
The absence of questions does not reliably indicate that a customer has fully absorbed the risk disclosures in a PPM, so a careful representative should confirm the customer had a genuine opportunity to review the document and proactively address any points the customer may not have considered, rather than assuming silence equals understanding; the PPM and related documentation should remain in the customer's file, not be discarded, and having the customer restate the agreement in different words raises its own concerns rather than solving anything.36. A representative receives a signed subscription agreement from a customer for a private placement but notices the customer left the accredited investor certification section unsigned. Before submitting the subscription for processing, the representative should:
- A. Obtain the customer's completed certification before submitting the subscription, since an incomplete accreditation representation is not adequate to process the purchase
- B. Submit it and note internally that the certification will be completed later
- C. Sign the certification section on the customer's behalf using information from an earlier conversation
- D. Submit it anyway, since the rest of the agreement is signed
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
A subscription agreement's accredited investor certification is a material part of confirming the customer's eligibility to purchase the offering, so an incomplete certification should be resolved with the customer before the subscription is processed; signing on the customer's behalf, submitting incomplete paperwork, or planning to complete it later all risk processing a purchase without a proper eligibility record in place.37. After an investor's subscription in a private placement has been accepted and processed, what should the representative ensure the investor receives to confirm the transaction?
- A. Nothing, since private placement transactions do not require confirmation to the investor
- B. A new, unrelated offering's PPM to review for a future purchase
- C. Confirmation of the accepted subscription, including the amount invested and the interest purchased
- D. A verbal-only confirmation with no written record
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Once a subscription has been accepted, the investor should receive confirmation documenting the transaction, the amount invested and the interest or units purchased, so there is a clear record of what was completed; a verbal-only confirmation, an unrelated offering document, or no confirmation at all would leave the investor without proper documentation of the completed purchase.38. A representative processes a subscription in which the customer wired funds directly to the issuer's escrow account rather than through the broker-dealer, and the wire amount does not match the amount stated on the signed subscription agreement. The representative should:
- A. Reconcile the discrepancy with the customer and the issuer before treating the subscription as complete, since the funded amount and the subscribed amount must match for accurate processing
- B. Cancel the subscription permanently with no opportunity for the customer to correct the funding
- C. Adjust the subscription agreement's stated amount to match the wire without contacting the customer
- D. Assume the discrepancy is immaterial and proceed with processing as originally submitted
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
A mismatch between the amount wired and the amount stated on the signed subscription agreement must be resolved before the transaction can be treated as accurately processed and confirmed, since both documents need to reflect the same investment amount; unilaterally changing the paperwork, ignoring the discrepancy, or permanently canceling the subscription without giving the customer a chance to reconcile the funding are all inappropriate responses to what may be a simple, correctable error.39. A broker-dealer pays a referral fee tied to the size of each investor's subscription to an unregistered individual who is not associated with any FINRA member, in exchange for introducing accredited investors into a private placement. This compensation arrangement is:
- A. Prohibited, because Reg D offerings cannot pay any form of compensation to third parties
- B. Prohibited, because transaction-based compensation for effecting securities sales generally requires the recipient to be registered
- C. Permitted, because referral fees are exempt from registration requirements
- D. Permitted, provided the fee is disclosed in the PPM
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Paying compensation that is tied to the size or completion of a securities transaction is treated as effecting transactions in securities, which generally requires the recipient to be a registered representative associated with a broker-dealer; disclosure in the offering documents does not cure the underlying registration problem, and Reg D's exemption from registering the security does not exempt unregistered persons from broker-dealer registration requirements.40. Which of the following best describes the primary reason a private securities offering under Regulation D is not required to register the securities with the SEC?
- A. The issuer has obtained a waiver from state securities regulators
- B. The offering qualifies for an exemption from registration based on how and to whom it is offered and sold
- C. The securities are guaranteed by the broker-dealer
- D. The offering size is below the minimum threshold that triggers any securities law at all
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Regulation D provides a set of exemptions from the Securities Act's registration requirements, not an exemption from securities law altogether; issuers rely on the manner of offering, generally private and without broad public advertising, and the nature of the purchasers, largely accredited or sophisticated, to avoid registering the securities, while anti-fraud provisions and other investor-protection rules still apply in full.41. A representative wants to mention an upcoming private placement during an unsolicited mass email sent to a purchased list of 10,000 addresses with no prior relationship to the firm. If the offering is being conducted under an exemption that prohibits general solicitation, this email campaign would most likely:
- A. Be permitted as long as the email includes a risk disclaimer
- B. Be permitted because email is not considered a public advertisement
- C. Be permitted because the list was purchased rather than compiled internally
- D. Constitute impermissible general solicitation, since the recipients have no pre-existing relationship with the firm
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
General solicitation encompasses any broad, untargeted communication offering securities to persons without a pre-existing relationship, regardless of the medium used; blasting an offer to a purchased list of strangers is a textbook example of the kind of advertising the exemption is designed to prohibit, and adding a disclaimer does not change the nature of the communication.42. A private securities offerings representative maintains a personal blog, unaffiliated with any specific deal, where she writes general educational articles about how private placements work and links to her firm's contact page. This activity is best characterized as:
- A. Prohibited general solicitation because it reaches an unlimited audience
- B. Permissible general marketing of the representative's services, distinct from soliciting a specific 506(b) offering
- C. Permissible only if the blog is taken down before any specific offering begins
- D. Prohibited because representatives may not maintain any public-facing content
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
General solicitation restrictions attach to offers of a specific security in a specific exempt offering, not to a representative's general marketing of herself or her firm's services; educational content that does not identify or offer a particular private placement does not implicate the prohibition, though the representative would still need to be careful once she begins discussing an actual 506(b) deal with a specific prospect.43. A representative learns that an issuer, midway through a Rule 506(b) private placement raised solely through targeted relationship-based outreach, now wants to begin using paid online advertising to reach new prospects for the remainder of the raise. The representative should recognize that:
- A. General advertising is permitted under 506(b) as long as it is limited to existing prospects
- B. Paid online advertising has no effect on which exemption applies, since Reg D exemptions are chosen once and never change
- C. The issuer may use general advertising freely without any change to investor qualification requirements
- D. Once general advertising is used, the issuer can no longer rely on 506(b)'s no-solicitation exemption for the remainder of the offering and must instead satisfy 506(c)'s requirement to verify that new purchasers are accredited
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Rule 506(b)'s exemption from registration depends on not using general solicitation or advertising; introducing paid online advertising is inconsistent with that exemption, so the offering effectively shifts to the 506(c) framework, which permits broad advertising but requires the issuer to take reasonable steps to verify that purchasers are accredited rather than merely accepting self-certification.44. A client refers a friend to the representative and receives no compensation, direct or indirect, for the referral. The friend later invests in a private placement the representative is soliciting. This referral arrangement:
- A. Generally does not raise broker-dealer registration concerns, since no transaction-based or other compensation was paid for the referral
- B. Requires the referring client to register as a broker-dealer
- C. Is prohibited because only registered representatives may ever mention an investment to another person
- D. Requires FINRA pre-approval before the friend may be solicited
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Broker-dealer registration requirements are triggered by receiving compensation for effecting securities transactions; an uncompensated, one-time personal referral by a client does not transform that client into someone engaged in the business of effecting transactions, so no registration issue arises from the referral itself, though the representative still must properly solicit and qualify the referred prospect.45. A representative is soliciting a high-net-worth prospect for a private placement and learns during the conversation that the prospect intends to fund the investment entirely by liquidating a retirement account that represents nearly all of his liquid savings. Even though the prospect appears to meet the accredited investor income or net worth test, the representative should:
- A. Refuse to discuss the offering further, since accredited investors may never use retirement funds
- B. Recognize that meeting the accredited investor definition does not, by itself, establish that the investment is suitable given the prospect's concentration and liquidity needs
- C. Proceed without further inquiry, since accredited investor status is the only relevant qualification for a private placement
- D. Treat the prospect as non-accredited because retirement assets do not count toward net worth
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Accredited investor status is a regulatory threshold for eligibility to purchase certain exempt securities, but it is a separate question from suitability, whether the specific investment fits the customer's overall financial situation, objectives, and liquidity needs; a representative who learns a prospect would concentrate nearly all his liquid savings, including retirement funds, into one illiquid private placement has additional suitability concerns to address regardless of the prospect's accreditation.46. A prospect asks a representative why the private placement he is being offered was never registered with the SEC and whether that means the investment is less safe. The most accurate response is that:
- A. Only fraudulent offerings rely on registration exemptions
- B. The exemption means state regulators, rather than the SEC, guarantee the investment
- C. Registration exemption means the SEC has reviewed and approved the investment's merits, just through a faster process
- D. Exempt offerings are not reviewed by the SEC for merit; the exemption relates to how the securities may be offered and sold, not a determination that the investment is safe
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
A registration exemption changes the offering's regulatory pathway; it is not, and does not require, an SEC or state determination that the investment is safe or sound. Representatives have a duty to give prospects an accurate understanding that exempt status reflects the offering's structure and the investors it targets, not a safety endorsement, and no regulator guarantees any private placement.47. A representative is preparing a presentation for a private placement and wants to include hypothetical performance figures based on a similar past deal sponsored by the same management team. To avoid being misleading, this presentation should:
- A. Avoid any risk disclosure so the figures are not undermined
- B. Omit any mention that the figures are hypothetical, since disclaimers deter investors
- C. Present the figures without any reference to the underlying past deal
- D. Clearly label the figures as hypothetical, describe the basis for the comparison, and disclose that past performance does not guarantee future results
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Using performance from a comparable past deal can be informative, but only if the audience understands the figures are hypothetical or historical rather than a projection for this specific offering, understands the basis for the comparison, and is reminded that past results do not guarantee future performance; omitting these clarifications, or stripping away risk disclosure, risks creating a misleading impression that the new deal is expected to replicate the prior one's results.48. A prospect who does not meet the accredited investor definition tells a representative that his brother-in-law, a licensed attorney, will review all offering documents on his behalf before he invests. In the context of the sophistication requirement for a non-accredited purchaser under 506(b), this arrangement:
- A. Automatically disqualifies the prospect, since using outside advisors is prohibited
- B. May help satisfy the sophistication requirement, since a qualified purchaser representative can evaluate the investment's merits and risks alongside or on behalf of the purchaser
- C. Converts the prospect into an accredited investor automatically
- D. Is irrelevant, since only the prospect's own knowledge and experience can be considered
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
The sophistication standard for non-accredited purchasers under 506(b) can be met by the purchaser alone or together with a purchaser representative, someone with the requisite knowledge and experience, such as a qualified attorney, who evaluates the investment's merits and risks on the purchaser's behalf; this does not change the prospect's accreditation status, which depends on separate income or net worth criteria, but it can help satisfy sophistication.49. A representative is contacted by a prospect who saw a factual, non-promotional announcement, naming only the issuer, the type of security, and the amount offered, about a private placement that was published to satisfy a notice requirement. Under securities law, this type of narrowly-tailored factual announcement is generally treated as:
- A. Sufficient by itself to permit the sale of securities to the prospect without further steps
- B. Prohibited general solicitation in all circumstances
- C. Distinct from general solicitation because it is limited to basic factual information rather than promoting investment merits
- D. A full public offer requiring SEC registration
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Narrow, factual notices that identify only basic details like the issuer and type of security, sometimes called tombstone-style announcements, are treated differently from promotional solicitation because they do not tout investment merits or urge a purchase; such a notice is not itself an offer that permits a sale, and the representative would still need to follow the applicable exemption's requirements before soliciting or selling to the prospect.50. Before opening an account to purchase units in a private placement, a representative must obtain sufficient information about a customer's financial profile. Which piece of information is most directly relevant to determining whether the customer is suitable for an illiquid private placement?
- A. The customer's liquidity needs and the proportion of the investment relative to the customer's overall liquid net worth
- B. The customer's preferred communication method
- C. The customer's employer's industry classification
- D. The customer's political affiliation
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Suitability for an illiquid private placement depends heavily on whether the customer can afford to have funds tied up for an extended period without access, which requires evaluating liquidity needs and how large the proposed investment is relative to the customer's overall liquid net worth; preferred contact method, employer industry, and political affiliation have no bearing on that assessment.51. To verify a prospect's status as an accredited investor for a Rule 506(c) offering under the income test, a representative could reasonably request:
- A. Nothing, since income verification is never required for 506(c) offerings
- B. A copy of the prospect's driver's license only
- C. Copies of recent tax filings or W-2s covering the applicable period, along with a written representation of expected current-year income
- D. Only a verbal statement from the prospect confirming income exceeds the threshold
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Reasonable verification of the income test for accredited investor status under an offering that uses general solicitation typically involves reviewing objective documentation such as recent tax filings or W-2s covering prior years, together with a written representation regarding expected current income, rather than accepting a purely verbal statement, a form of identification unrelated to income, or skipping verification altogether.52. A prospect claims accredited investor status under the net worth test but declines to provide any financial documentation, asking the representative to simply take his word for it, for an offering that is using general solicitation. The representative should recognize that:
- A. This is acceptable because verbal assertions are legally binding representations
- B. This is acceptable, since net worth is always self-certified
- C. This is acceptable only if the prospect is a repeat customer
- D. This is problematic, since offerings using general solicitation require reasonable verification steps beyond a bare, undocumented assertion
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
When an offering relies on general solicitation, the heightened verification standard requires more than accepting an investor's bare word; the representative and issuer need some form of objective support, such as financial statements, credit reports, or third-party confirmation, and a prospect's refusal to provide any documentation should be a red flag rather than something resolved by treating the assertion as automatically sufficient because it is legally binding or because the prospect is familiar to the firm.53. Which of the following best describes why representatives must evaluate a customer's investment time horizon before recommending a private placement?
- A. Private placements are typically illiquid and may require the investor's capital to remain committed for an extended period
- B. Time horizon determines the customer's eligibility to use a purchaser representative
- C. Time horizon has no bearing on the suitability of illiquid investments
- D. Time horizon is only relevant for retirement accounts, not private placements
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Because private placements typically lack a public market and often involve lock-up or holding periods before any exit or liquidity event, a customer's investment time horizon, how soon the customer may need access to the funds, is directly relevant to whether the investment fits the customer's circumstances; it is unrelated to purchaser representative eligibility and applies to any account type, not only retirement accounts.54. A private placement memorandum (PPM) typically includes a dedicated risk factors section. The primary purpose of this section is to:
- A. Summarize the sponsor's biography and unrelated business history
- B. List all prior investors who have already committed capital
- C. Provide a marketing summary of why the deal is attractive to investors
- D. Disclose the specific risks associated with the offering so investors can make an informed decision
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
The risk factors section exists specifically to give prospective investors a clear, offering-specific picture of the material risks, such as illiquidity, reliance on key personnel, or industry-specific risks, so they can make an informed investment decision; it is not intended as marketing material, a list of existing investors, or unrelated biographical content, all of which belong in other parts of the PPM if included at all.55. An issuer completing a Regulation D offering is generally required to file a notice with the SEC identifying basic information about the offering, such as the issuer and the amount sold. A representative should understand that this filing:
- A. Is optional and rarely completed by issuers
- B. Is a notice filing rather than a registration, and does not involve SEC review or approval of the offering's merits
- C. Constitutes SEC approval of the offering's investment merits
- D. Substitutes for full SEC registration of the securities
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
The Reg D notice filing provides basic identifying information about the offering to the SEC but is fundamentally different from a registration statement; it does not require, and does not result in, SEC review or approval of the offering's investment merits, and completing it is generally expected of issuers relying on the exemption rather than being optional or a substitute for registration.56. A representative is asked by a customer to explain what a subscription agreement accomplishes in a private placement transaction. The best explanation is that the subscription agreement:
- A. Is only used for offerings sold to institutional investors
- B. Is a marketing document describing the sponsor's track record
- C. Is the binding contract through which the investor agrees to purchase a specified interest, makes required representations such as accredited investor status, and agrees to the offering's terms
- D. Replaces the need for a private placement memorandum
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
The subscription agreement is the legal document that formalizes an investor's commitment to purchase a specified interest in the offering; it typically includes the investor's representations, such as confirming accredited status or investment intent, and acceptance of the offering's terms, and it works alongside, rather than replacing, the PPM's disclosure function, applying to individual as well as institutional purchasers.57. A limited partnership sponsoring a private placement plans to issue Schedule K-1 tax forms annually to investors. A representative explaining this to a prospect should note that:
- A. K-1s guarantee the investor a fixed annual dividend payment
- B. K-1s replace the need for the investor to file a personal tax return
- C. K-1s are only issued if the investment loses money
- D. K-1s report the investor's share of the partnership's income, losses, deductions, and credits for tax purposes, and often arrive later than standard Form 1099s
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
A Schedule K-1 reports a partner's or member's allocated share of the entity's income, losses, deductions, and credits, which the investor must incorporate into his own tax filing; K-1s are commonly noted for arriving later in tax season than standard 1099 forms, they are issued regardless of whether the investment was profitable, and they supplement rather than replace an investor's personal tax return.58. A customer asks whether he may later transfer or assign his interest in a private placement to a family trust. The representative should explain that:
- A. Transfers of private placement interests are always freely permitted with no restrictions
- B. Transfers require SEC approval on a case-by-case basis
- C. Transfers are permitted only to another accredited individual investor, never to a trust
- D. Transfers are typically restricted by the offering documents and may require issuer or general partner consent, in addition to satisfying securities-law resale conditions
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Private placement interests commonly carry transfer restrictions in the governing offering and partnership or operating agreements, such as a requirement for issuer or general partner consent, layered on top of the separate securities-law conditions that apply to reselling restricted securities; transfers are not freely unrestricted, are not limited only to individual accredited investors, and the SEC does not conduct case-by-case approval of private transfers.59. Why do private placement memoranda typically include detailed disclosure about the sponsor's compensation and any conflicts of interest?
- A. Because such disclosure is optional marketing content unrelated to investor decision-making
- B. Because such disclosure eliminates any conflicts of interest that exist
- C. Because conflicts of interest disclosure is required only for publicly registered securities
- D. Because investors need to understand how the sponsor is compensated and where its interests may diverge from investors' interests to evaluate the offering fully
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Disclosing sponsor compensation structures and potential conflicts of interest allows investors to understand how the sponsor is paid and where the sponsor's incentives might diverge from the investors' interests, which is material to evaluating the offering; this disclosure obligation is not limited to registered securities and disclosing a conflict does not eliminate it, it simply informs the investor of its existence.60. A customer holding restricted securities purchased in a Rule 506(b) offering nineteen months ago asks the representative to facilitate a private resale to another accredited investor who approached the customer directly, rather than a public market sale. The representative explains that this type of resale:
- A. May be structured to rely on a private resale exemption, but the representative should still consider factors such as the holding period, the purchaser's qualification, and whether the transaction avoids characteristics of a distribution
- B. Requires the issuer to file a new registration statement covering the resale
- C. Is treated identically to a public market sale and requires no analysis of the buyer's status
- D. Is impossible, since restricted securities can never be resold under any circumstances
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
A privately negotiated resale of restricted securities to another qualified investor can potentially rely on an exemption separate from a public Rule 144 sale, but the representative facilitating it should still think through whether the applicable holding period has been satisfied, whether the purchaser is appropriately qualified, and whether the transaction has the characteristics of an exempt private resale rather than a de facto public distribution; none of this is automatic, and it does not require a new registration statement or get treated as identical to an ordinary public sale.61. An issuer's private placement is structured with a stated minimum offering amount that must be reached before any investor funds are released from escrow to the issuer. A representative processing a new subscription during this period should confirm that the investor understands:
- A. The minimum offering amount does not apply to escrowed funds
- B. The subscription funds will remain in escrow, unavailable to the issuer, until the stated minimum is reached or the offering is otherwise terminated
- C. The investor may withdraw funds from escrow for personal use at any time before the minimum is met
- D. Funds will be released to the issuer immediately upon signing, regardless of the minimum
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
In a contingency offering structure, investor funds are placed in escrow and are not released to the issuer until the stated minimum offering amount is achieved or the offering otherwise closes or terminates; investors should understand that their money is held, not immediately available to the issuer and not accessible to the investor for other uses, until that contingency is resolved.
More in this family
Explore more FINRA Series exams
In the same family
- Securities Industry Essentials (SIE)Practice questions →
- General Securities Representative Exam (Series 7)Practice questions →
- Uniform Securities Agent State Law Exam (Series 63)Practice questions →
- Investment Company and Variable Contracts Products Principal Exam (Series 26)Practice questions →
- Research Analyst Exam (Series 86/87)Practice questions →
- Financial and Operations Principal Exam (Series 27)Practice questions →
- Investment Company and Variable Contracts Products Representative Exam (Series 6)Practice questions →
- Registered Options Principal Exam (Series 4)Practice questions →
- General Securities Principal Sales Supervisor Module Exam (Series 23)Practice questions →
- General Securities Principal Exam (Series 24)Practice questions →
- Supervisory Analyst Exam (Series 16)Practice questions →
- Direct Participation Programs Representative Exam (Series 22)Practice questions →
2026 statistics
Key facts: Series 82 exam
The Series 82 is administered by FINRA, with 50 scored questions, a 1 hour 30 minutes time limit and a passing score of 70%.
This free Series 82 practice test has 61 original questions written to FINRA's official content outline, last checked against it on August 9, 2026. Every question shows a worked explanation, and nothing here requires a signup.
As of 2026, the Series 82 exam fee is $100.
Every free resource for this exam
Get a free Series 82 study plan
A week-by-week plan plus new practice questions, straight to your inbox.
Official sources
Every exam fact on this page traces to a primary document published by the body that administers the exam.
- Series 82 - Private Securities Offerings Representative Exam | FINRA.orgFINRAfinra.org
- Securities Industry Essentials (SIE) Exam | FINRA.orgFINRAfinra.org
- Qualification Exams | FINRA.orgFINRAfinra.org
Last verified against the official exam content outline:
Frequently asked questions
How many questions are on a Series 82 practice test?
A realistic Series 82 practice test mirrors the real exam's 50 scored questions so you get used to the pacing and question style before test day.
What score do I need to pass on a Series 82 practice exam?
Aim to consistently score at or above 70%, the same passing standard FINRA uses on the actual Series 82 exam, before you consider yourself exam-ready.
What topics should a Series 82 practice test cover?
A good practice bank weights questions the way FINRA does, with the heaviest concentration on soliciting and evaluating private securities offerings business, since that function accounts for more scored questions than any other content area on the exam.
Is this Series 82 practice test free?
Yes, you can start practicing immediately with no signup or payment required.
How should I use a Series 82 practice test to study?
Take a full-length timed run under the same 90-minute limit as the real exam, review every missed question against the underlying rule, and repeat until your weakest content areas stop showing up in your misses.
Do I need to study the SIE exam too when practicing for the Series 82?
Yes, because the SIE is a corequisite, so most candidates prepare for both exams together rather than treating the Series 82 as a standalone credential.